|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 18,215
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 18,215 |
How's that 6 degree weather working out with the protesters?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,350
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,350 |
How's that 6 degree weather working out with the protesters? The 6 deg temp isn't so bad. It's the 30-40 mph wind that will get you.
Music washes away the dust of everyday life Some people wait a lifetime to meet their favorite hunting and shooting buddy. Mine calls me dad
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 8,109
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 8,109 |
......out of 17+ billion barrels since 1977. Just for the purposes of comparison, The Exxon Valdez only spilled about 257,000 gallons (approximately the volume of 7 Olympic sized swimming pools.) Not the largest spill, by a long shot, but the location of the spill is what caused the majority of the resulting problems. Afterwards, no one would let them dock, so it was renamed, and docked with no problem. After changing ownership and names several times, it was finally broken up for scrap in India. (Iirc)
An unemployed Jester, is nobody's Fool.
the only real difference between a good tracker and a bad tracker, is observation. all the same data is present for both. The rest, is understanding what you're seeing.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
Numerous "protestors" were living homeless in the stairwells of hotels up in Bismarck during this blizzard. What a fiasco!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
......out of 17+ billion barrels since 1977. Just for the purposes of comparison, The Exxon Valdez only spilled about 257,000 gallons (approximately the volume of 7 Olympic sized swimming pools.) Not the largest spill, by a long shot, but the location of the spill is what caused the majority of the resulting problems. Afterwards, no one would let them dock, so it was renamed, and docked with no problem. After changing ownership and names several times, it was finally broken up for scrap in India. (Iirc) Exxon Valdez was commonly estimated as having spilled 11 million gallons. 251,712 barrels comes out to be 10,571,904 gallons. Some estimates were much higher.
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 8,109
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 8,109 |
......out of 17+ billion barrels since 1977. Just for the purposes of comparison, The Exxon Valdez only spilled about 257,000 gallons (approximately the volume of 7 Olympic sized swimming pools.) Not the largest spill, by a long shot, but the location of the spill is what caused the majority of the resulting problems. Afterwards, no one would let them dock, so it was renamed, and docked with no problem. After changing ownership and names several times, it was finally broken up for scrap in India. (Iirc) Exxon Valdez was commonly estimated as having spilled 11 million gallons. 251,712 barrels comes out to be 10,571,904 gallons. Some estimates were much higher. you caught one of my typos. ( since it takes so long to post one of these, I sometimes forget to check for errors) that should have read BARRELS not gallons, and 17 swimmingpools, not 7. (Sorry about that)
An unemployed Jester, is nobody's Fool.
the only real difference between a good tracker and a bad tracker, is observation. all the same data is present for both. The rest, is understanding what you're seeing.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
559 members (10gaugemag, 1936M71, 160user, 1234, 06hunter59, 1Longbow, 58 invisible),
2,402
guests, and
1,277
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,532
Posts18,491,244
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|