|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 21,827 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 21,827 Likes: 3 |
Long action (Whelen) or short (338) ?
How important is are a few ounces? 338 lighter?
Local on the shelf ammo important, is it existent for either? You need to figure this out.
If you reload, is a wide and varied choice of bullets important? More 338 available if they chamber in your rifle.
If it's available in the rifle you want, you reload, and a long action is ok. 338-06
If you just want a "big gun" 9.3x62.
Last edited by Dillonbuck; 04/22/17.
Parents who say they have good kids..Usually don't!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,927
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,927 |
Consider the 350 rem mag. I owned a 350 Rem Mag in a Remington 673. I did local trade with guy and wish I would have kept it. I really enjoyed that rifle. Loaded the Spear 220gr, shot it into bugholes. Took a couple of deer with it. I moved on to the 338-06 and have not looked back.
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,360 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,360 Likes: 1 |
First off, I'll admit I'm prejudiced. My vote is for the .35 Whelen. I'll also admit that I consider Remington's factory ammo to be rather anemic as just as they did with the .280 Rem. they went with loads suitable for pump and semi-auto rifles. When will they ever learn? Handloaded the Whelen is a horse of another color. My pet load shoots the 225 gr. Barnes TSX at 2710 FPS and drops elk like a rock. I've taken elk as far out as 350 yards with it. JMHO but I think the 225 gr. bullets are the way to go, especially if after game larger than deer. For the great bears, probably would go with the 250 gr. Nobler Partition but would now worry with the 225 gr. TSX. As has been mentioned. one can download it to the levels off the .35 Rem. or .358 Win. for deer with a reduction in recoil if that's an issue and go to full power loads for the larger game. The Whelen is also an excellent cast bullet cartridge should you want to try that route. I have three .35 Whelens. A Ruger M77RS I use for cast bullets, a Remington M700 Classice for 250 gr. bullets and a very nice custom Mauser I found at an estate sale. It's been my go to rifle for elk with the barnes TSX bullet. Groups run in the .50 to .75" range when I do my part. That would be one of the very last rifles I would ever part with. Paul B.
Our forefathers did not politely protest the British.They did not vote them out of office, nor did they impeach the king,march on the capitol or ask permission for their rights. ----------------They just shot them. MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,920
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,920 |
It is easy to improve on the way a 35 Whelen hit the target.
If going after a large maneating or just tough animal just change the type and or weight of bullet. As said it does a fine job with cast as well.
For a varmint bullet i use those heavy pistol bullets at speeds less than full loads. If the stock fits you it does not kick any more than a 30-06 or other types.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,280
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,280 |
i like my 338 Federal in a Sako 85 SS Hunter. Has a 2-7x36 Kahles TDS. Shoots 200 Federal Fusion Ammo very well.
Originally Posted By: slumlord
people that text all day get on my nerves
just knowing that people are out there with that ability,....just makes me wanna punch myself in the balls
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,505
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,505 |
"The game that I'll mostly be hunting is deer."
Then why would you even consider a .35 Whelen or a .338 Federal?
A 30-06 or .308 would be far superior: Less recoil, better trajectory, ammo more available, ammo costs less, bullets for reloading cost less, you can practice more for the same dollars. Plenty of power to kill any deer that walks and, in case you ever hunt elk, that too. If you're absolutely never going to hunt elk, consider a 6.5, .270, or .280/7mm.
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
35 whelen
I used to be intrigued by more obscure chamberings, now I'm more concerned with how easy it is to get component brass, and how appropriate the available component bullets are to the velocity range of the round.
To me the biggest issue with the 338 fed is most component bullets are designed for the 400 fps higher velocity of the 338 win mag. The 210 gr partition would be a good bullet for the 338 fed, but I'm not much interested in a one trick pony.
If you want a 338, go with the win mag and if can't handle the recoil use 225's and throttle them back to 2700 fps.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,721
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,721 |
So, looks like the jury has spoken. Post pix of your new Whelen when you get it. Now he'll go out and buy a .257 Roberts. I chose a 25-06 nearly 50 years ago (1969). Glad I did then and now. Everything from many prairie dogs to several elk have been shot with the same rifle, which is by the way, a M77 Ruger with a custom stock.
The things that come to those that wait may be the things left by those who got there first.
Unk
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 36
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 36 |
Thanks guys. A lot of good info. It seems like the 338 fed doesn't get much love. This must be because it's still a relatively new cartridge. What I have read on the internet about the Fed is that people that have one absolutely love it. People that don't have one basically see no need for the cartridge with so many 30 cals out there that work fine. So it sound like the whelen is comparable to the 30-06 depending on how it's loaded. I think the most punishment that I've gone through recoil wise was sighting in my mossberg500 with 1oz slugs. Shot well over 20 rounds finally got it sighted in after checking the scope rings and found them loosening up. Rookie mistake I know, should've checked that earlier.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,730 Likes: 19
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,730 Likes: 19 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
The main reason there isn't much love for the 338 fed, 358 win, 35 whelen, 350 rem mag, 325 wsm and so forth and so on is that the critters that require more than a .264-.30 bore in NA are few and far between.
If you're going to jump to the next level of power, you jump to the 338 win mag or 375 H&H.
Nothing has changed In the past 60 years to negate that reality.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,360 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,360 Likes: 1 |
Just thought I'd add this from another site. Paul B.
The 35's Reputation
The 35s have been too often given a "bad rep" - an undeserved kick in the sides from quite a few gun pundits. What have some been reporting? That they are all medium range cartridges. Enemic factory ammo has somewhat fueled this. However, if you roll your own, there are a number of the 35s that can be excellent long range recipes for big game hunting success - when properly loaded that is (see my comments and senario "But This Just In" bottom this page).
Spring 2005 Rifleshooter Magazine declares 35 Whelen the most efficient!
An article in March/April 2005 Rifleshooter Magazine entitled Cartridge Efficiency, written by George W. Calef, proposes - "Forget about the highest power and velocity : which rounds produce the most with the powder they burn?"
I think Calef's article is somewhat flawed with errors of fact, some questions about logic, and and some ommisions (like straight walled cases like the 444 Marlin and the 45- 70 and other worthy efficient wildcats). However, his basic conclusions about 35s are no suprise to knowledgable 35 calibre fans. They confirm my own reflections on relative cartridge efficiency. Calef presents his findings;
"I put my money on the 7mm-08, the .284 Winchester, or the .308 Win., with the thought in the back of my mind that, just possibly, the wonderful little .250 Savage would beat them all. Boy was I astonished when the numbers started rolling in - suprised on several counts in fact - and I suspect you will be too.
To keep you from holding your breath any longer, the winner is the .35 Whelen. This venerable cartridge (a long time wildcat designed way back in 1930 in honor of Col. Townsend Whelen and finally legitimized in 1995 [note - error of fact - should read 1988] by Remington) delivers more kinetic energy and a higher L [Wooter's lethality index] factor per grain of powder burned than any other cartridge.
In Ackley's improved version it is even better, becoming the only cartridge on the list capable of generating more than 50 ft-lbs of energy and a L factor exceeding 5.00 at 200 yards for each grain of powder loaded.
What's more as a group, the .35s are all highly efficient, beating virtually every cartridge of smaller caliber. Even the obscure .358 Norma Magnum is the most efficient of the belted-magnum cartridges [note - by the author's own data the 350 Remington Magnum bests the 358 Norma]. This wonderful efficiency of the .35 calibers is especially remarkable when one considers that most all of these rounds are verging on obsolescence today. Take a look at the list of .35-caliber cartridges; do you or any of your friends shoot one? Luckily they are not entirely gone. In fact Remington reintroduced the splendid .350 Remington Magnum a couple of years ago in the model 600 carbine series."
Edited to add from 35cal.com PB
Last edited by PJGunner; 04/23/17.
Our forefathers did not politely protest the British.They did not vote them out of office, nor did they impeach the king,march on the capitol or ask permission for their rights. ----------------They just shot them. MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
X2 No need for either unless bigger game is a possibility and really not even then. No way I would buy a 35 Whelen or a 338 Federal if I didn't reload. The MRC gun is also a bit heavy. If this is a first big game gun,you will be much better served with a lower recoiling caliber and you may want a lighter gun. If it is a first,I would highly suggest one of the discount Tikka T3's under $500. If I had to pick I would pick the Whelen and learn to reload, since it has the most versatility with reloads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091 |
35 whelen bullets range in weight from 150 to 300 grains. More bullet options and greater power if needed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097 |
Whelen, will shoot the 250 gr.s with umph, 338Fed, not so much.... .338F 250gn around 2100-2200mv, will knock the lights out of anything from a 2000lb bull eland and down. even at distances many people won't shoot at...and trajectory out to 250yd or so aint as bad as some might imagine. 2200 MV 250NP (B.C. .473) S.D .313 100yd 2.69" high 200yd 1872vel 1945egy 250yd 1796vel 1791egy...-7.39"
-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3 |
Whelen, will shoot the 250 gr.s with umph, 338Fed, not so much.... .338F 250gn around 2100-2200mv, will knock the lights out of anything from a 2000lb bull eland and down. even at distances many people won't shoot at...and trajectory out to 250yd or so aint as bad as some might imagine. My .35 Whelen gets 2470 fps with a 250 gr bullet,from a 22" barrel.
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,178 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,178 Likes: 1 |
Well we're Green and we're Gold, and we play better when it's cold. All us Cheese heads have our favorite superstar. We love Brett Favre.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 36
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 36 |
Ok starman, crs, and 007fj tell me what it is that you like about the 338 federal. I can get factory ammo (fusion) at cabelas and a couple other factory loads at gander mountain. I hear good things about the fusions out of the Fed. If I go with the Fed I would like to be able to push a 210 partition to about 2650 and other 200 grainers to 2700 or faster. Would that be possible with this cartridge? I haven't started reloading yet but I plan on it soon after getting the rifle. Whichever one I choose.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097 |
First let me say theres nothing I don't like about the 35Wh...nor here to talk you out of 35Wh in anyway. I would not argue anything about long vs short act. either. I don't have a 338F, but I do know the performance of the .338win at longer ranges, the impact velocities which I trans-late into how 338F would perform at closer ranges with similar impact vel.
The 338fed is capable of serving many people very well as can 35Wh. although you didn't present the option of 338/06 or 338RCM, they would be the ones I also considered if I wanted to comfortably push a .338cal 200-210 in the area of 2700.
I would also point a .308win 200gn NP/AF 2400-2500, at the same creatures I would .338F or 35Wh.
-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,806
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,806 |
I've never understood the lack of love for the .35 from us (Americans). At the turn of last century we had the very fine 35 Newton. When that faded Griffin & Howe gave us a great 350 Magnum. There has been a host of great .35s and the only one to really catch on is the 9 x 57... errr Whelen.
Be Polite , Be Professional , but have a plan to kill everybody you meet -General James Mattis United States Marine Corps
Nothing is darker than a mau mau's moo moo.
|
|
|
|
561 members (1minute, 1badf350, 160user, 1Longbow, 10ring1, 1936M71, 57 invisible),
2,529
guests, and
1,254
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,338
Posts18,487,696
Members73,969
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|