24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
E
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
Ive spent 6 or 7 hours with these. For comparison, I went back and forth between older non-swarovision EL 8.5 x42 and Zeiss HD 8x32. I’m frankly very impressed with the Tracts.

Mechanically they were comfortable and easy to focus/adjust. The attention to detail appears outstanding.

Optically, the only real difference with the ELs is the ELs are sharper around the edges. This gives the impression of a larger field of view. Clarity and brightness, even in very low light is indistinguishable to my eyes. In good light, the Zeiss were the equal in clarity (obviously, it’s not fair to compare them to the larger EL/Tracts in very low light).

To my eyes, the Zeiss glass brings out colors best. Interestingly, I felt the ELs and Tracts were identical in the color contrast test. By way of full disclosure, I’m severely red-green color blind so the color contrast may be experienced differently by others.

Everyone’s eyes are different. Having said that, I would rate the Tracts an exceptional value.

GB1

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,549
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,549
But did you throw them off a cliff and drive over them with your truck to test durability?

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
E
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
I knew that was coming.....

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,871
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,871
Do you think performance wise that they sit in that $1k range - Conquest HD, Razor, Trinovid, etc?

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
E
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 864
Absolutely. Hence, I’m quite impressed with the value

IC B2

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Originally Posted by lantx
Do you think performance wise that they sit in that $1k range - Conquest HD, Razor, Trinovid, etc?


Having owned Conquest HD,Razors none of which I own anymore they do not measure up to a Trinovid, in fact not even close. I have owned the last 2 iterations of 8x42 Trinovids and sent the newest version back to Doug ...glass was sterling but the build quality was better on previous generation.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,268
Likes: 7
J
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,268
Likes: 7
Glad you like the Torics, and I'm not surprised. I've had them side by side with several different binos and they are the best available under $1500 IMHO. Enjoy!


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,534
N
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
N
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,534
So you guys compared them to MEOPTA MEOSTARS? I’m sure the Meoptas are a little more durable since they are really solid and heavier than most but would you guys say optically they are at least equal in clarity and low light performance? Do the TORICS have just as good depth of focus and do they fit the hands well?

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,268
Likes: 7
J
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,268
Likes: 7
As to the Toric/Meostar durability thing, who knows? Time will tell. I'd guess the Meopta to be king here. As to ergos, optics, etc, my 56 yr old eyeballs give the edge to the Toric. They're both great.


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177
Likes: 20
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177
Likes: 20
nuguy,

I've been using a 10x42 Toric pretty hard for several months now. I second what JG says about the optics, but have also found the Torics very well-built, while not being as heavy as the Meostars.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
IC B3

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43,939
Likes: 16
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43,939
Likes: 16
The focus wheel is noticeably better on the 10x42 Toric compared to my 8x42 SLC's(2015 version).

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 19
B
New Member
Offline
New Member
B
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 19
I'm no optics expert by any stretch of the imagination. I don't even know what chromatic aberration is. I only know what I see through my own eyes. I wound up buying a slightly used pair of Tract Torics in 8x42 off of archerytalk for a good price. Optically, TO ME, these are the best binos I have ever owned, and I had some Swaro 8x42 SLC's a couple of years ago, which I wound up trading. Again, TO ME, these were better in my eyes than the Swaros, especially in low light situations. The only complaint I have, and it is minor, is that the twist up eyecups, don't really lock in very well in the intermediate positions. I like them in what I consider position 3, and too often when I pick them up to look through them, one of the eyecups is out of position, and has to be readjusted. If there is a fix for that, these would be the perfect hunting binos, for these 63 year old eyes. That's my unprofessional take on the Tract Torics.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 6
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Mjduct
But did you throw them off a cliff and drive over them with your truck to test durability?


If you haven't, can I borrow them for a quick test?


jokes aside, I've been impressed with the glass in a Toric scope. Several evening hunts have shown it to be some really good glass. It seemed really good just shooting, but using it as the light fades has been an eye opener. If the bino's are cut from the same mold, especially considering the price, they would be the first place I'd look for new bino's.

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 162
B
Campfire Member
Online Content
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 162
Bamasnyper, I stacked some o-rings under the eye cups to lock them to the furthest position.

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 19
B
New Member
Offline
New Member
B
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 19
Okay, thanks. May give that a try.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,653
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,653
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by SamOlson
The focus wheel is noticeably better on the 10x42 Toric compared to my 8x42 SLC's(2015 version).



Truth.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

WWP53D
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43,939
Likes: 16
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43,939
Likes: 16
Scott, after comparing the 10x42 Toric and the 8x42 SLC I was so disappointed in the focus wheel on the Swaro that I sent them in for tune-up.

Actually I first tried to smooth them up with a little silicon but that did not, I repeat did not work.....
(bad idea....)

Explained the situation to Swaro and they fixed me up. The wheel is now better but still not as smooth as the Toric.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

534 members (22250rem, 1badf350, 160user, 10Glocks, 219 Wasp, 204guy, 44 invisible), 2,165 guests, and 1,203 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,231
Posts18,504,371
Members73,994
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.159s Queries: 48 (0.019s) Memory: 0.8754 MB (Peak: 0.9580 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-11 14:34:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS