|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 2 |
I bought a pair of Leica 7x42 binos about 10 years ago and promptly quit paying attention to other binoculars. They gave great service but I want to replace them with something smaller and lighter, possibly an 8x32. Budget is about $1k but could double for the right reasons.
What's the latest thinking on glasses in this category?
thanks,
Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,409
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,409 |
May I suggest you take a peek at the Kowa Genesis 8x33's. Check out this Swarovski EL vs Kowa Genesis review by a member of another forum. It would be my pleasure to discuss optics options with you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,313 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,313 Likes: 4 |
I bought a pair of Leica 7x42 binos about 10 years ago and promptly quit paying attention to other binoculars. They gave great service but I want to replace them with something smaller and lighter, possibly an 8x32. Budget is about $1k but could double for the right reasons.
What's the latest thinking on glasses in this category?
thanks,
Okie John The Leica 8x32 Ultravid is about all you need to know about 8x32’s... or, you can wait til next year for the 8x32 Noctivid.
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1 |
The 7x42 and 8x42 Leica Ultravid HD Plus are uniquely compact for 42mm class binoculars. I went with the 8x42, when making similar considerations. Sometimes, I regret not selecting the 7x.
I also have the Meopta Meostar HD 8x32mm wearing Cabela’s name. They’re a fantastic bargain.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
I bought a pair of Leica 7x42 binos about 10 years ago and promptly quit paying attention to other binoculars. They gave great service but I want to replace them with something smaller and lighter, possibly an 8x32. Budget is about $1k but could double for the right reasons.
What's the latest thinking on glasses in this category?
thanks,
Okie John The Leica 8x32 Ultravid is about all you need to know about 8x32’s... or, you can wait til next year for the 8x32 Noctivid. ^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 23,506 |
The 7x42 and 8x42 Leica Ultravid HD Plus are uniquely compact for 42mm class binoculars. I went with the 8x42, when making similar considerations. Sometimes, I regret not selecting the 7x.
I also have the Meopta Meostar HD 8x32mm wearing Cabela’s name. They’re a fantastic bargain.
Why 7x or 8x bins? I’m throwing darts, but is it because hunting in a dense forested or treed environment the magnification isn’t needed? Serious question 😎
Curiosity Killed the Cat & The Prairie Dog “Molon Labe”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,762
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,762 |
The Zeiss 8 x 32 FL's are great, really bright. If you get a used pair, it will be close to 1K.
The Kowa Prominars 8 x 33 binoculars are really nice too.
Last edited by Old Ornery; 08/31/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,133 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,133 Likes: 6 |
1k?? dude meopta meostar's not even a question. tank like build quality. if you wear glasses eye relief is a tad short. I have some 10x42's HD's I haven't ebay'd yet let me know if interested.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1 |
The 7x42 and 8x42 Leica Ultravid HD Plus are uniquely compact for 42mm class binoculars. I went with the 8x42, when making similar considerations. Sometimes, I regret not selecting the 7x.
I also have the Meopta Meostar HD 8x32mm wearing Cabela’s name. They’re a fantastic bargain.
Why 7x or 8x bins? I’m throwing darts, but is it because hunting in a dense forested or treed environment the magnification isn’t needed? Serious question 😎 Yes, my home hunting grounds are hardwood timber and small farms in the foothills of the Appalachians in Pennsylvania. These forests are selectively cut and dense. This environment favors FOV, brightness, and contrast. I’ve got 10x Geovids for out west. grin.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 23,506 |
Your hunting grounds sound like a Doolittle Painting on steroids...😁😎
Curiosity Killed the Cat & The Prairie Dog “Molon Labe”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1 |
Maybe without the indians and horses. Lol.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,936 Likes: 2 |
These forests are selectively cut and dense. This environment favors FOV, brightness, and contrast. This, exactly. Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,762
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,762 |
On a 1K budget I would give the Kowa's a good look, I recently found a bargain on a pair of Meopta Meopro 8x32's and I was not impressed at all so I promptly sent them back ...I have never handled a pair of the newer Meostar bin's so they may be the chit for all I know......Good luck....Hb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,831 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,831 Likes: 2 |
I bought a pair of Leica 7x42 binos about 10 years ago and promptly quit paying attention to other binoculars. They gave great service but I want to replace them with something smaller and lighter, possibly an 8x32. Budget is about $1k but could double for the right reasons.
What's the latest thinking on glasses in this category?
thanks,
Okie John The Leica 8x32 Ultravid is about all you need to know about 8x32’s... or, you can wait til next year for the 8x32 Noctivid. ^^^^^ For size, picture and weight these are excellent. Can't say I have a beater rifle, but these would qualify as my beater binoculars. During hunting season they are either around my neck or lying on the 4Runner passenger seat.
Last edited by battue; 09/02/18.
laissez les bons temps rouler
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 113
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 113 |
I have a Swarovski 8x30 CL and can't think of a better bino (I have handled and used about everything out there!) Right arround 1k
Rockhounding and varmint huntin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,141
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,141 |
Have had most mentioned, I like the Meopta Meostar 8x32 the best
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807 |
For the fun of it I wanted to try a vary power binoc.
The Leupold 7/32/X32mm's are so neat!
They go to 12X and hold steady!
Leupold 7/32X32mm Switch Power binoculars.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6 |
Many good options in that price range, although some options will need to be gently used. You didn't mention if you wear eyeglasses, some of the options are right at the minimum for eye relief with glasses. New, I'd recommend the 8x32 Meostar or Kowa Prominar without hesitation. And there are no flies on the Maven B3 8x30 either (far more budget friendly too). The Swarovski 8x30 CL (my opinion only) is not worth the price they command - unless you want to pay a premium for poor field-of-view. *grins* Concerning second-hand options - the Swarovski EL (pre-SV), Zeiss FL's and Leica Ultravid in 8x32 should all be right around your budget. One note concerning the Leica 32mm - if you have deeper eye sockets, fitment might not be the best for you. I had an 8x32 and while it was, IMO, the purest view between it and the EL/FL (had all three), I could not settle in behind it without some shifting around. Lastly, and kingston eluded to it already, the 7x42 Leica you currently have is not much taller in height than many of the 32/33mm options - lighter, yes, more compact - not by much. Please consider hanging onto your 7x42 until after you've solidified your 8x32/33 pursuit. BTDT.
WWP53D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6 |
For the fun of it I wanted to try a vary power binoc. I have had them all, Incl. Swarovski!
The Leupold 7/32/X32mm's are so neat!
They go to 12X and hold steady!
Leupold 7/32X32mm Switch Power binoculars.
Yeah, you had an ancient copy of Swarovski. And there's a reason the Leupold switch-power is no longer offered.
WWP53D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,762
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,762 |
I had the Meostar 8 x 32's for awhile. While the view is pretty good, the eyecups were too small, and kept "falling" into my eye sockets, making i difficult to get a steady picture. The Zeiss Conquest HD's and Kowa's would be my favorites for around 1K.
|
|
|
|
396 members (22kHornet, 1beaver_shooter, 160user, 06hunter59, 1Longbow, 1badf350, 34 invisible),
2,540
guests, and
1,099
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,783
Posts18,536,241
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|