|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826 |
If you replaced the lead core of a 150 grain bullet with tungsten, the bullet would have the same bearing surface but would weigh well over 200 grains. Would it need a faster twist to stabilize it instead of the 150 grain bullet?
Wayne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 286
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 286 |
The RPM required to stabilize is a function of velocity, twist rate and bullet length The velocity is a function of bullet weight and (simplified) case capacity.
So, if you increase the weight, you will be lowering the velocity. IF your origional 150gr was borderline stable, than you won't be stable at the 200gr velocity. On the flip side, if your 200gr velocity and twist rate can provide enough RPM's to stabilize that bullet length, than you will be OK.
Clear as mud?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8 |
If you replaced the lead core of a 150 grain bullet with tungsten, the bullet would have the same bearing surface but would weigh well over 200 grains. Would it need a faster twist to stabilize it instead of the 150 grain bullet?
Wayne No, allows a SLOWER minimum twist. The minimum twist required to stabilize a certain caliber bullet is a function of: bullet length (longer needs faster twist), velocity (slower needs SLIGHTLY faster twist), bullet density (denser ex: tungsten allows slower twist, less dense ex: solid copper requires faster twist) and "medium" = air at sea level vs. air at 10,000 ft vs. water---that the bullet goes through (the denser the medium, the faster the twist required so less twist required at 10,000 ft. than at sea level) joe brennan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826 |
Dunno. Since weight and length have pretty well gone hand in hand for so long, I'm not convinced that it is greater weight ( or length)that requires faster twist. Slower, you bet, because of the pressure thing. ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 286
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 286 |
Look at the twist rate recogmended for a VLD style bullet, vs the rate that you know works for a RN style of the same caliber and weight.
Weight and length only "go hand in hand" when your talking about the same basic style/construction. In the same caliber, a 200gr LWC will be a lot shorter than a aluminum 200gr VLD style, even though both weigh the same and can be launched at the same velocity, do you think they both have the same twist requirment?
Yes, it's the pressure thing that forces the lower velocity with the heavier bullet. This could be avoided, for purposes of discussion, by using different chamberings IE: 150gr in a 308 and 200gr in a 300Wby, to get the same velocity for each bullet at which time you would find that they both respond to the same twist rate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,667 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,667 Likes: 3 |
Tailgunner is correct.........length of the bullet (and related is bearing surface) determines required minimum twist rates.
This is why monolithic bullets (Barnes X) sometime do not shoot well vs the same WEIGHT of a standard lead/copper bullet.
The monolithic bullet, being longer for a given weight can sometimes require a faster twist rate for best accuracy.
MM
|
|
|
|
83 members (257 roberts, 257_X_50, 21, 2ndwind, 41rem, 8 invisible),
2,359
guests, and
977
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,779
Posts18,536,017
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|