24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
I recall seeing a barrelled action of the above at one point and wondered if anyone had heard of this outfit? Wondering if its a marginal action to house 577 also.

GB1

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 158XTP
I recall seeing a barrelled action of the above at one point and wondered if anyone had heard of this outfit? Wondering if its a marginal action to house 577 also.


I have not, but do know the 577 Nitro is a low pressure round in my double when regulated to 2076 fps with the 750gr bullets, a falling block may offer more strength for loading up to more or max pressure, but good god man that things going to BOOT! cool


Trump Won!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Turns out its their Model 3 falling block action. Can find almost no specific info on it. They did make other action sizes apparently.

https://www.riflemagazine.com/falling-block-works#:~:text=Falling%20Block%20Works%20falling-%20block%20actions%20are%20investment,Wall%20and%20giving%20the%20two%20rifles%20similar%20appearances.

There is a 577 nitro barrelled action going nearby. Would love to know if it can handle slightly stepped up loads easily(maybe 2150fps fps with 750 grain) or if its more along the lines of a ruger no.1 where its a marginal chambering.


Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
Older guy named Avi? youtube channel 1tuffgun? he may be from your neck of the woods, a Ruger #1 in 577 Nitro will easily handle any pressures a man cares to stand behind.


Trump Won!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
IC B2

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself. When I had my 585 built on a cz550 I recall the gunsmith warning me off the idea of 577 nitro on the ruger . Admittedly I was looking to run higher velocities, closer to Trex power levels.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 158XTP
I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself. When I had my 585 built on a cz550 I recall the gunsmith warning me off the idea of 577 nitro on the ruger . Admittedly I was looking to run higher velocities, closer to Trex power levels.


What do you "I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself"

The Number 1 is perfectly fine for factory spec 577 ammo



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 14
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 14
Ruger No. 1 action is limited to .577 rim diameter to make the extractor/ejector work.
It can surely handle the thrust and pressure.
The biggest barrel shank it can handle is only about 1.140", IIRC, and the barrel threads are a little on the small side in diameters.
Keeping the forearm attached due to recoil and torque requires frequent checking of the hanger screw.
Even the mighty .458 WinMag can twist a forearm loose if neglected.
It will loosen and even bend that screw after 200 rounds of neglect.
No loose screws please, replace at first sign of stripping or bending.
I bought a bunch of replacement screws for future use, socket head machine screws of good quality.
Handy to keep tight with a hex key in pocket.

A Sharps Borchardt 1878 sure would be nice.
The Sharps 1874 can handle bigger rim size and barrel shank diameter, bigger threads, than a Ruger No. 1, but how about the pressure and thrust issue on that ?



Ron aka "Rip" for Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
.458 Winchester Magnum, Magnanimous in Victory
THE WALKING DEAD does so remind me of Democrap voters. Donkeypox.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
Sir Ron, dont know what a modern '74 Shiloh Sharps action could take pressure wise, i would look elsewhere, a modern '85 Highwall Winchester would carry the freight provided it's a wider action than the Ruger #1.


Trump Won!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by 158XTP
I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself. When I had my 585 built on a cz550 I recall the gunsmith warning me off the idea of 577 nitro on the ruger . Admittedly I was looking to run higher velocities, closer to Trex power levels.


What do you "I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself"

The Number 1 is perfectly fine for factory spec 577 ammo


As per my earlier post I referenced 2150fps with 750 which is beyond normal 577nitro specs. Some of us run hotter loads than original in these nitros if the actions are modern and built for it.

IC B3

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Originally Posted by Riflecrank

A Sharps Borchardt 1878 sure would be nice.
The Sharps 1874 can handle bigger rim size and barrel shank diameter, bigger threads, than a Ruger No. 1, but how about the pressure and thrust issue on that ?



Interesting Ron. Do you recall the massive falling block action that came out in the mid 2000's that was called a Borchardt? I dont know much about historical actions but pretty sure they were just using the name since these could handle 50BMG and 700 nitro and we worked out even 4 bore would squeeze in. Anyone recall them or know what happened to their outfit. I believe they ran about $2500 in 2004.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,802
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,802
I saw a new 600NE in a falling block action here in Brisbane a few years back. I don't recall who made it. It was company made.

The guy loaded it as a functional test and the cartridge got stuck - couldn't close it fully to fire it or open it to extract it. I think they were able to cautiously hammer the action open again but it was taking too long and I wandered off before the issue was resolved.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 158XTP
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by 158XTP
I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself. When I had my 585 built on a cz550 I recall the gunsmith warning me off the idea of 577 nitro on the ruger . Admittedly I was looking to run higher velocities, closer to Trex power levels.


What do you "I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself"

The Number 1 is perfectly fine for factory spec 577 ammo


As per my earlier post I referenced 2150fps with 750 which is beyond normal 577nitro specs. Some of us run hotter loads than original in these nitros if the actions are modern and built for it.


Wow a whopping extra 100 FPS that ought to be huge



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 158XTP
Originally Posted by Riflecrank

A Sharps Borchardt 1878 sure would be nice.
The Sharps 1874 can handle bigger rim size and barrel shank diameter, bigger threads, than a Ruger No. 1, but how about the pressure and thrust issue on that ?



Interesting Ron. Do you recall the massive falling block action that came out in the mid 2000's that was called a Borchardt? I dont know much about historical actions but pretty sure they were just using the name since these could handle 50BMG and 700 nitro and we worked out even 4 bore would squeeze in. Anyone recall them or know what happened to their outfit. I believe they ran about $2500 in 2004.


158, you may be thinking about the Farquharson actions, iirc they came in a kit....................BTW, First Stop Guns and Steve Barnett Fine Guns has 577 Nitro Farquharsons in stock on gunsinternational.com! cool


Trump Won!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by 158XTP
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by 158XTP
I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself. When I had my 585 built on a cz550 I recall the gunsmith warning me off the idea of 577 nitro on the ruger . Admittedly I was looking to run higher velocities, closer to Trex power levels.


What do you "I personally wouldnt push a 577 nitro on the no.1 too hard myself"

The Number 1 is perfectly fine for factory spec 577 ammo


As per my earlier post I referenced 2150fps with 750 which is beyond normal 577nitro specs. Some of us run hotter loads than original in these nitros if the actions are modern and built for it.


Wow a whopping extra 100 FPS that ought to be huge





It makes a difference to me, particularly expansion at longer ranges. Fastest I ran my 585 is about 2400fps but its a heavier gun. A single shot 577 about 2150 -2200fps is about as hard as I would go these days.


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Gunner500,
This were them, single shot 50BMG sized falling block actions. The thread below had Rob Garnick(600 overkilll inventor) putting his 12GAFH into one. I was on that thread too, was looking at 700 nitro at the time but the exchange rate was a killer. There is a low quality pic of the action about half way down, Id forgotten what they look like. I guess this action is no longer in production.

http://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4711043/m/924105801?r=924105801#924105801

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
1
158XTP Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 808
Well I found out more info on the FBW actions. Off another site:

Falling Block Works, Inc. began manufacturing their Model "H" pattern single shot action in 1971. Located in Troy, Michigan, the company was owned by Leo and Joe Fix. The action was simple and capable of being chambered for any shoulder held cartridge. Over the years the Fix brothers designed and sold the Model "J", "K", "L", and "S". The mechanical workings of the actions are very simple and and strong. Actions were available polished and blued, stock attachment was with thru-bolt, the only options available was choices of fancy levers. Semi-finished stocks were available from Fajen and Paul Shuttleworth. All actions, except the Model "K", were proof tested to 67,400 CUPS. The FBW was made up till about 1990.



This is the schematic of the J action which can house 577 nitro.

https://www.shootersforum.com/attachments/model-j-interior-view-jpg.7057/

And these folks appear to make stocks for these actions still

https://www.cparifles.com/collections/falling-block-works-stocks

Amazing what is out there.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,940
Likes: 1

Are you going to build one?



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,662
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,662
Is that "peg" at the front of the buttstock the only thing that supports it! How could that handle the recoil forces of a 577????

Last edited by Biebs; 02/07/22.
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 14
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,372
Likes: 14
Karl,
That was a huge Borchardt 1878 scale-up that robgunbuilder had for 50 BMG or 12 GaFH.
Came from Southwest USA small-time maker, now gone with the wind IIRC.

Then there was the guy who built his own, scaled up Sharps 1874 for a 50 BMG he shot with BP.
A one-off woo hoo !


Ron aka "Rip" for Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
.458 Winchester Magnum, Magnanimous in Victory
THE WALKING DEAD does so remind me of Democrap voters. Donkeypox.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

558 members (1234, 17CalFan, 160user, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 1lesfox, 61 invisible), 2,310 guests, and 1,167 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,517
Posts18,490,944
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.145s Queries: 55 (0.018s) Memory: 0.9076 MB (Peak: 1.0262 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 14:04:50 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS