24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 32 of 36 1 2 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
I
IZH27 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
I
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
Evidence is subjective based in many factors. You undoubtedly understand that but roll on with your arguments.


Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by IZH27
Evidence is subjective based in many factors. You undoubtedly understand that but roll on with your arguments.

Evidence is an objective body of information, something that anyone who cares to can examine. The evidence itself provides information.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
I
IZH27 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
I
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
So science presently has the ability to consider all data points, have a complete view of the situation and there are no other angles to be discovered from which to test science.


You definitely chose to practice a faith.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,927
Likes: 15
W
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
W
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,927
Likes: 15
"John 3:16"


These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by IZH27
So science presently has the ability to consider all data points, have a complete view of the situation and there are no other angles to be discovered from which to test science.


You definitely chose to practice a faith.

Not in the least. Science is based on rigorous testing. Unlike faith, falsification is not discouraged. Evolution has stood testing for over 150 years. If someone is able to falsify evolution, it would be sensational, amazing, worldwide news.

It has not been done. The evidence is unshakeable.

PS, the way mentioned faith suggests that you acknowledge its limitations, yet religious belief is founded on faith.

IC B2

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,280
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,280
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by CAPITALIST
I've got 2 comical paradigm shifts that happened to me that I'd like to use to demonstrate a point:

1. I've always been told (since younger than I can remember) that I looked exactly like my Dad. He was almost 6' tall with a very large bone-structure and the muscle to go along with it. I'm 5'6" and smaller structured (I'm not "small" by any means, just smaller than he was). Yet, because of what everyone said, I guess I just assumed that my head was as big as his (again, this began very young) and I just never questioned it. I bought a sweet sport bike when I was 37 (a blue and white Yamaha R1) and I was absolutely shocked that a large helmet that came with the bike could almost be turned all the way around with my head installed... it was huge on me. My older brother then pointed something out that I'd never heard before: "You've got a tiny head"... HUH? The very next morning in the shower while washing my hair, I noticed how small my head was... for the first time in 37 years I didn't have the over-sized cranial structure of my father, even though it was never there to begin with! hahahaha

and 2. I've never liked gambling. I work - and always have worked - very hard for my earnings and never even bought lottery tickets (except once when the power ball got over $1 billion and my wife wanted one... I still did not want it). Then I went to a seminar for investing in the stock market... long story short, over the next 4 years I'd blown over $40,000 and realized - to my own horror - that I displayed every single symptom of an addicted gambler and most of them of an addicted drug abuser. I had to investigate all of the information from all sides to intelligently evaluate my "truths" in both of these examples, though the latter was a much larger blow to mentally absorb... okay, maybe this one wasn't "comical".

With those examples, I'm postulating that for several generations, schools have not just been teaching, but *indoctrinating* the very similarly susceptible minds of the youth that the only possibility of truth is in their version of "science" and any discussion otherwise would be dealt with by immediately shaming the intellecutal acuity of those youths, thereby "teaching them lessons" against ever practicing true science with the exploration of all possible information... these also are lessons that won't soon be questioned.

I've seen many of Richard Dawkins' debates. One in particular was with Frank Turek who cited dozens of absolutely indisputeable scientific facts who then earnestly requested that Mr. Dawkins present any evidence that could refute these facts. Dawkins wasn't even listening (or he was ignoring)... not one morsal of evidence cited for refutation (even though Turek had soundly addressed each of those posed by Dawkins); only harsh criticisms of how "dumb" Christians were for believing the impossibility of God. The very same science proves them wrong on every front.

Ray Comfort (a simple New Zealand street-preacher who now lives in California) made a few videos in which he interviewed several other giants of evolutionary theory: P.Z. Myers, Craig Stanford, Gail Kennedy, Peter Nonacs and yes, Penn Gillette. He *stumped* them with the most simplistic of questions and truths. He was *not* there to badger them into accepting Christ or even accepting the possibility of Him. He was sincerely (and lovingly) trying to lead them to the Truth by pointing out the most basic of scientific facts espoused by all genres of study. He was using the same science to prove them and their conclusions to be at the minimum suspect and in reality, not even possible. Not one had even a smidgeon of a retort and many had long pauses of incredulity (like my helmet experience!) Penn Gillette even threatened to sue him if his reactions were put on the internet.

A third shift occurred to a good friend of mine. He was a black belt in Karate before he was 16 years old. He professed it was like, "fighting inside a box" and didn't like it even though he was state champion at the time (about 17 or so). I was just beginning in a Chinese art that was much more fluid and which he was very intrigued by when I demonstrated it to him... but he was so invested in his rank, that he couldn't allow himself to be freed from his own "box" that he had helped to build.

Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things"

I really want everyone who believes in evolution to ask themselves 3 questions:
1. Am I positive that evolution is true?
2. Do I feel disgust or even pity for others who don't believe in evolution?
3. Do I vehemently defend evolution to those who believe otherwise?


If you answered "Yes" to these questions, understand that just as I had no idea that I was gambling (I wasn't "gambling", it was the *stock market* for Pete's sake!), you haven't yet realized that evolution is absolutely your religion. You answered "Yes" to those questions and if you replaced the word "Evolution" with "Christ" I would've answered "Yes" to every one of them, also. Yes, you are religious, and you should be scientifically evalutaing your "truths" just as I have mine (and continue to). Again, the Smithsonian Institution spent years trying to prove The Bible wrong. There were things they couldn't prove or disprove (a talking donkey?!!!), but for everything that could be verified ...it was ...every time. That's science that I can take comfort in.

If I'm wrong what have I lost? If you're wrong, I'm praying sincerely for you.

If anyone can disprove evolution, they should go for it.

A more lively topic would be the “proof” of evolution….. why don’t you start a new thread with the “proofs” of evolution?

And don’t in with that weak ass fruit fly nonsense…. That is not evolution, that is just evolutionist renaming normal genetic variation….this was done, presumably as there is little…. Perhaps…no…evidence for evolutionary change.

May start with the evolution of the horse?

It's been done to death. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, it is proven, it is readily available in journals, textbooks and online....it has been quoted and cited countless times....but of course rejected out of hand by those who prefer special creation, which has no evidence.

Nope, you are again totally wrong.

So, go ahead …. Give us some “proof.”

Try not to cut and paste…..



Edit to add:

Were I to tell you that the many OT prophecies regarding the Messiah were fulfilled in Jesus and that fulfillment was unequivocal proof that those prophesies were inspired and ordained by God….. would you accept that as proof that Jesus was indeed the Messiah?

If your answer is no….. care to explain why?

Last edited by TF49; 07/16/22.

The tax collector said: “Lord Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner.” Jesus said he went home “justified.”

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by IZH27
Evidence is subjective, based on many factors.
Agreed. Wholeheartedly.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 569
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 569
I'm just going to say it: DBT, you're just a closed-minded, religious zealot. I've cited piles of evidence from your side of the aisle (I'm citing the 2nd law of thermodynamics, et al, not the Book of Revelation, here), and just as I predicted earlier, you only come right back with, "... give me evidence", after the evidence was given... and then completely ignored once cited.

Evolution is your religion and your god (to mock Ozzy Osbourne who praises rock & roll), but don't be upset when I defend Christ as stoutly as you defend Darwin... and don't point a finger of ridicule in my direction when there's 3 pointing back at yourself. Evolution has been "PREACHED" for over 150 years, but don't confuse that with being *PROVEN* for over 150 years because it hasn't.

Absolutely none of the fossil records support speciation, only adaptation. The birds that had their beaks alter over generations were still birds; their beaks didn't become snouts with fangs and their bodies didn't develop into felines. No fossils of a pre-pterodactyl subspecies have ever been located... only perfect, complete pterodactyls... they have located sabre-toothed tigers... eventually adapting into... you guessed it: tigers. When I go out in the hot sun, my skin turns red and eventually darkens; grapes become raisins; plums become prunes... adaptation.

Last edited by CAPITALIST; 07/16/22. Reason: grammar and punctuation

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry." - Thomas Jefferson

"Normal" isn't coming back; Jesus is!
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
Originally Posted by TF49
Try not to cut and paste…..

?

Reliance on the bible is an exercise of cut and paste.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
Originally Posted by CAPITALIST
I'm just going to say it: DBT, you're just a closed-minded, religious zealot. I've cited piles of evidence from your side of the aisle (I'm citing the 2nd law of thermodynamics, et al, not the Book of Revelation, here), and just as I predicted earlier, you only come right back with, "... give me evidence", after the evidence was given... and then completely ignored once cited.

Evolution is your religion and your god (to mock Ozzy Osbourne who praises rock & roll), but don't be upset when I defend Christ as stoutly as you defend Darwin... and don't point a finger of ridicule in my direction when there's 3 pointing back at yourself. Evolution has been "PREACHED" for over 150 years, but don't confuse that with being *PROVEN* for over 150 years because it hasn't.

Absolutely none of the fossil records support speciation, only adaptation. The birds that had their beaks alter over generations were still birds; their beaks didn't become snouts with fangs and their bodies didn't develop into felines. No fossils of a pre-pterodactyl subspecies have ever been located... only perfect, complete pterodactyls... they have located sabre-toothed tigers... eventually adapting into... you guessed it: tigers. When I go out in the hot sun, my skin turns red and eventually darkens; grapes become raisins; plums become prunes... adaptation.

Groan!

The science of evolution and natural selection is pretty much rock solid. Denial allows immediate dismissal of any credibility.

With some effort you'd be able to properly research your concerns - it's really not that hard.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by CAPITALIST
I've got 2 comical paradigm shifts that happened to me that I'd like to use to demonstrate a point:

1. I've always been told (since younger than I can remember) that I looked exactly like my Dad. He was almost 6' tall with a very large bone-structure and the muscle to go along with it. I'm 5'6" and smaller structured (I'm not "small" by any means, just smaller than he was). Yet, because of what everyone said, I guess I just assumed that my head was as big as his (again, this began very young) and I just never questioned it. I bought a sweet sport bike when I was 37 (a blue and white Yamaha R1) and I was absolutely shocked that a large helmet that came with the bike could almost be turned all the way around with my head installed... it was huge on me. My older brother then pointed something out that I'd never heard before: "You've got a tiny head"... HUH? The very next morning in the shower while washing my hair, I noticed how small my head was... for the first time in 37 years I didn't have the over-sized cranial structure of my father, even though it was never there to begin with! hahahaha

and 2. I've never liked gambling. I work - and always have worked - very hard for my earnings and never even bought lottery tickets (except once when the power ball got over $1 billion and my wife wanted one... I still did not want it). Then I went to a seminar for investing in the stock market... long story short, over the next 4 years I'd blown over $40,000 and realized - to my own horror - that I displayed every single symptom of an addicted gambler and most of them of an addicted drug abuser. I had to investigate all of the information from all sides to intelligently evaluate my "truths" in both of these examples, though the latter was a much larger blow to mentally absorb... okay, maybe this one wasn't "comical".

With those examples, I'm postulating that for several generations, schools have not just been teaching, but *indoctrinating* the very similarly susceptible minds of the youth that the only possibility of truth is in their version of "science" and any discussion otherwise would be dealt with by immediately shaming the intellecutal acuity of those youths, thereby "teaching them lessons" against ever practicing true science with the exploration of all possible information... these also are lessons that won't soon be questioned.

I've seen many of Richard Dawkins' debates. One in particular was with Frank Turek who cited dozens of absolutely indisputeable scientific facts who then earnestly requested that Mr. Dawkins present any evidence that could refute these facts. Dawkins wasn't even listening (or he was ignoring)... not one morsal of evidence cited for refutation (even though Turek had soundly addressed each of those posed by Dawkins); only harsh criticisms of how "dumb" Christians were for believing the impossibility of God. The very same science proves them wrong on every front.

Ray Comfort (a simple New Zealand street-preacher who now lives in California) made a few videos in which he interviewed several other giants of evolutionary theory: P.Z. Myers, Craig Stanford, Gail Kennedy, Peter Nonacs and yes, Penn Gillette. He *stumped* them with the most simplistic of questions and truths. He was *not* there to badger them into accepting Christ or even accepting the possibility of Him. He was sincerely (and lovingly) trying to lead them to the Truth by pointing out the most basic of scientific facts espoused by all genres of study. He was using the same science to prove them and their conclusions to be at the minimum suspect and in reality, not even possible. Not one had even a smidgeon of a retort and many had long pauses of incredulity (like my helmet experience!) Penn Gillette even threatened to sue him if his reactions were put on the internet.

A third shift occurred to a good friend of mine. He was a black belt in Karate before he was 16 years old. He professed it was like, "fighting inside a box" and didn't like it even though he was state champion at the time (about 17 or so). I was just beginning in a Chinese art that was much more fluid and which he was very intrigued by when I demonstrated it to him... but he was so invested in his rank, that he couldn't allow himself to be freed from his own "box" that he had helped to build.

Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things"

I really want everyone who believes in evolution to ask themselves 3 questions:
1. Am I positive that evolution is true?
2. Do I feel disgust or even pity for others who don't believe in evolution?
3. Do I vehemently defend evolution to those who believe otherwise?


If you answered "Yes" to these questions, understand that just as I had no idea that I was gambling (I wasn't "gambling", it was the *stock market* for Pete's sake!), you haven't yet realized that evolution is absolutely your religion. You answered "Yes" to those questions and if you replaced the word "Evolution" with "Christ" I would've answered "Yes" to every one of them, also. Yes, you are religious, and you should be scientifically evalutaing your "truths" just as I have mine (and continue to). Again, the Smithsonian Institution spent years trying to prove The Bible wrong. There were things they couldn't prove or disprove (a talking donkey?!!!), but for everything that could be verified ...it was ...every time. That's science that I can take comfort in.

If I'm wrong what have I lost? If you're wrong, I'm praying sincerely for you.

If anyone can disprove evolution, they should go for it.

A more lively topic would be the “proof” of evolution….. why don’t you start a new thread with the “proofs” of evolution?

And don’t in with that weak ass fruit fly nonsense…. That is not evolution, that is just evolutionist renaming normal genetic variation….this was done, presumably as there is little…. Perhaps…no…evidence for evolutionary change.

May start with the evolution of the horse?

It's been done to death. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, it is proven, it is readily available in journals, textbooks and online....it has been quoted and cited countless times....but of course rejected out of hand by those who prefer special creation, which has no evidence.

Nope, you are again totally wrong.

So, go ahead …. Give us some “proof.”

Try not to cut and paste…..



Edit to add:

Were I to tell you that the many OT prophecies regarding the Messiah were fulfilled in Jesus and that fulfillment was unequivocal proof that those prophesies were inspired and ordained by God….. would you accept that as proof that Jesus was indeed the Messiah?

If your answer is no….. care to explain why?


Repeating ''you are totally wrong'' like a mantra doesn't make it so.

I'm doing nothing more than pointing out the basics of logic, reason, philosophy and science. It's not even controversial.

It's a simple thing: observations are made, evidence is acquired and thoroughly analyzed and tested....which builds a picture of how the world works.

It's the most successful method of understanding the world, the universe and our place in it that we have ever had.

The results are spectacular. Astronomy, technology, chemistry, medicine surpassing anything anything found in our collection of holy books or faith in general.

The evidence is undeniable, even while you are using it to argue for faith.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,651
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by CAPITALIST
I'm just going to say it: DBT, you're just a closed-minded, religious zealot. I've cited piles of evidence from your side of the aisle (I'm citing the 2nd law of thermodynamics, et al, not the Book of Revelation, here), and just as I predicted earlier, you only come right back with, "... give me evidence", after the evidence was given... and then completely ignored once cited.

Evolution is your religion and your god (to mock Ozzy Osbourne who praises rock & roll), but don't be upset when I defend Christ as stoutly as you defend Darwin... and don't point a finger of ridicule in my direction when there's 3 pointing back at yourself. Evolution has been "PREACHED" for over 150 years, but don't confuse that with being *PROVEN* for over 150 years because it hasn't.

Absolutely none of the fossil records support speciation, only adaptation. The birds that had their beaks alter over generations were still birds; their beaks didn't become snouts with fangs and their bodies didn't develop into felines. No fossils of a pre-pterodactyl subspecies have ever been located... only perfect, complete pterodactyls... they have located sabre-toothed tigers... eventually adapting into... you guessed it: tigers. When I go out in the hot sun, my skin turns red and eventually darkens; grapes become raisins; plums become prunes... adaptation.

It's a closed mind that takes dogma on faith, without question, discouraging dissent and questioning.

I have studied comparative religion and the contradictions between them and internally, sects, denominations, interpretations, etc.

On the contrary, it is those who adhere to ancient beliefs, faith, things written in old scrolls that have closed their mind to other possibilities....

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
R
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
R
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Almost 95% of the worlds population believe in a god, A Supreme being that created life itself. The other 5% are atheists and scientists. LOL

51% of the worlds population believes in THE God, our God.

The Bible tells us in Psalms 14:1 that the fools of this world believe in their hearts there is no god. And in Romans 1:22-23: 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools, 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images of mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

In Luke 9:5 we are told by Jesus: And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.

Shake that dust off, Brothers. These creatures are inconsequential, irrelevant, and without hope. Darwin's god was Satan and so is theirs, whether they know it or not. Ignore them as they are ignorant and totally undiscerning but tremendously deceiving. If you think you need to acknowledge them at all, let it be a "get behind me Satan" as did Jesus did when Peter was talking foolishly.


We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?

Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
I
IZH27 Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
I
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,623
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by IZH27
So science presently has the ability to consider all data points, have a complete view of the situation and there are no other angles to be discovered from which to test science.


You definitely chose to practice a faith.

Not in the least. Science is based on rigorous testing. Unlike faith, falsification is not discouraged. Evolution has stood testing for over 150 years. If someone is able to falsify evolution, it would be sensational, amazing, worldwide news.

It has not been done. The evidence is unshakeable.

PS, the way mentioned faith suggests that you acknowledge its limitations, yet religious belief is founded on faith.


I most certainly do question my faith. That is the mark of true faith or mature faith. I follow the example of Paul.

Your evidence is unshakable. Which is to mean unchangable, complete, having covered all variables, having account for all possible options?

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,927
Likes: 15
W
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
W
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,927
Likes: 15
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,409
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,409
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by CAPITALIST
I'm just going to say it: DBT, you're just a closed-minded, religious zealot. I've cited piles of evidence from your side of the aisle (I'm citing the 2nd law of thermodynamics, et al, not the Book of Revelation, here), and just as I predicted earlier, you only come right back with, "... give me evidence", after the evidence was given... and then completely ignored once cited.

Evolution is your religion and your god (to mock Ozzy Osbourne who praises rock & roll), but don't be upset when I defend Christ as stoutly as you defend Darwin... and don't point a finger of ridicule in my direction when there's 3 pointing back at yourself. Evolution has been "PREACHED" for over 150 years, but don't confuse that with being *PROVEN* for over 150 years because it hasn't.

Absolutely none of the fossil records support speciation, only adaptation. The birds that had their beaks alter over generations were still birds; their beaks didn't become snouts with fangs and their bodies didn't develop into felines. No fossils of a pre-pterodactyl subspecies have ever been located... only perfect, complete pterodactyls... they have located sabre-toothed tigers... eventually adapting into... you guessed it: tigers. When I go out in the hot sun, my skin turns red and eventually darkens; grapes become raisins; plums become prunes... adaptation.

It's a closed mind that takes dogma on faith, without question, discouraging dissent and questioning.

I have studied comparative religion and the contradictions between them and internally, sects, denominations, interpretations, etc.

On the contrary, it is those who adhere to ancient beliefs, faith, things written in old scrolls that have closed their mind to other possibilities....

There's a quote from “Discipleship of the Mind”, pg 50, by James W. Sire, saying, "Our world view, should be both consistent and coherent. That is, not only should it not contain any contradictions, but it should be composed of presuppositions which fit well together, presuppositions which, because they are as correct as we can get them, give us a coherent picture of the way things really are."

In other words, to be an Atheist and believe in reincarnation defies logic. Our beliefs must line up with each other, or they become insufficient…… if that's all there's to it - is there anything further to discuss? Beliefs don't need logic…. Where does this go now? Does logic need belief?


Illegitimi non carborundum

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,866
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,866
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by IZH27
Evidence is subjective, based on many factors.
Agreed. Wholeheartedly.

Exactly. Creationists and Evolutionists use the same evidence.


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by IZH27
Paul goes into great detail in Roman’s to demonstrate that the Covenant with Abraham, the covenant of salvation, preceded the law. It was faith/belief that was counted. Not adherence to Law.
And that is why many in the Hebrew Roots Movement despise Paul. Calling him “a schizophrenic” and saying “he’s been known to hallucinate” and saying other derogatory things about him. Despite the fact that Jesus clearly said that Paul was handpicked by Him to carry the Gospel to the Gentiles ‘and’ to the Jews.
Originally Posted by IZH27
Salvation has never been attained or maintained by the law.
Apostle Peter would be quick to say “I’m tellin’ ya’ I was in the home of a Roman centurion and I saw God do for those Gentiles exactly what God did for us Jews 20 years ago. And they did not have the Mosaic Law, they don’t know the Mosaic Law, they’ve never done ‘anything’ to become Jewish, and yet I saw God accept them just as He did for us.”

Apostle Peter made it clear that it was time for the Jews to accept the fact that God had done what He was going to do for them, and now He’s doing something for the entire world and they (the Jews) need to be a part of it.

Even though it means letting go of, and setting aside, the traditions and the Mosaic Law (the old covenant) that they’d grown up with.

Apostle Peter knew that Christianity was ‘not’ Judaism 2.0, that it was ‘not’ an add-on, that it was a stand-alone ‘say goodbye to the past’ brand new movement and New Covenant.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by Ringman
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by IZH27
Evidence is subjective, based on many factors.
Agreed. Wholeheartedly.
Exactly. Creationists and Evolutionists use the same evidence.
Yep. Funny how two people can look at the same evidence and come up with polar opposite conclusions.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 569
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 569
M9MM and DBT; I've *CITED* many facts and sources... to which you've offered not a single rebuttal other than how intellecutally impossible God could be... not a single rebuttal.
1. 2nd law of thermodynamics
2. The law of conservation of mass and energy
3. Jericho has been found having had the tops of the walls *pushed down as one unit until they were at the same level as the foundations of the buildings*
4. Sodom and Gomorrah have been found destroyed by sulpur (ever asked what the Hebrew meaning of "fire and brimstone" actually was?)
5. Noah's Ark was found having slid down Mount Ararat with very clear trenching showing its original placement... at the top
6. Gold-covered *chariot wheels* were discovered at the *BOTTOM OF THE RED SEA*! Roughly 220 MILES away from their beginning in Egypt
7. Human femurs were found in the 1950's that were over *5 FEET LONG*! HUMAN FEMURS!
8. Fossils from dinosaurs have been located *many* times with *SOFT TISSUE STILL INTACT*!!! How could *SOFT TISSUE* still exist after 65,000,000 years? It couldn't
9. Marco Polo wrote *SUCCINCT* descriptions of seeing *LIVE ANIMALS* exactly matching Tyrannosaurus Rex around 1,295 A.D. or roughly 65,001,295 years *AFTER MODERN SCIENCE SAYS THEY WERE EXTINCT*
10. The simple *FLAP* inside your body going between the larynx and the trachea - called the epiglottis - without which you *DIE. FIRST MEAL. DEAD!* So where's the time for this to be *EVOLVED*
11. ZERO FOSSIL RECORD EVIDENCE SUPPORTS *SPECIATION* only *ADAPTATION*
12. You both display every single symptom of defending of religious beliefs! hahahahaha I had to throw that in! hahahahaha

Not a single rebuttal, and there's *THOUSANDS* more that could be cited right behind them, but I'm not holding my breath any of these will be rebutted... *AGAIN*, just tell me to supply you with scientific fact... You've already done it.

Last edited by CAPITALIST; 07/17/22. Reason: too many zero's in my 65,000,000 year quote

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry." - Thomas Jefferson

"Normal" isn't coming back; Jesus is!
Page 32 of 36 1 2 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

584 members (1936M71, 22250rem, 007FJ, 10Glocks, 160user, 1beaver_shooter, 64 invisible), 2,480 guests, and 1,302 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,478
Posts18,490,006
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.238s Queries: 55 (0.018s) Memory: 0.9508 MB (Peak: 1.0937 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 00:08:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS