24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,237
B
bt8897 Online Content OP
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,237
I currently have a pair of 8.5x42 el , 8x30 SLC and 7x42 SLC. I am thinking about selling both of the 8 powers and buying a pair of 8x32 or 8x42 NL Pure's. My question is will there be a significant diffrence between them and the Pures ?, and does anyone have any experience with both the 32 and 42 Pure's? I dont know if my aging eyes can take advantage of the greater exit pupil of the 42's

GB1

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 606
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 606
I have the 8x42 Pures and have owned or looked thru all your current Binos. They're all good. I really like how the Pure 8x42's have small feeling in hand, I don't feel much difference in them vs other 32's.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,549
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,549
I’ve got the 10X42 Pures and all I can say is Wow every time I look thru them.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Originally Posted by JBB111
I have the 8x42 Pures and have owned or looked thru all your current Binos. They're all good. I really like how the Pure 8x42's have small feeling in hand, I don't feel much difference in them vs other 32's.

Moved to the 10x42 NL Pures from a set of EL SV 8.42s a few months back. The ergos of the NL pure are fantastic. As JBB111 said, NL 42s (8x or 10x, IMHO) are not much different than other mfrs 32s. FWIW, don't short yourself - go with the 42s - this from a guy who passed the half-century mark several years ago.


I never thought I'd grow up to be a grumpy old man, but I did, and I'm killin' it.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,657
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by bt8897
I dont know if my aging eyes can take advantage of the greater exit pupil of the 42's

Yes they can, that's exactly why you get the 42's

IC B2

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,237
B
bt8897 Online Content OP
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,237
I think im just going to order the pures and do a side by side test myself

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,988
Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,988
Likes: 3
I finally got some EL 10 x 42 last year and I was amazed how good the glass was in them compared to my Leupold Porro Prism 10 x 40s- and the Leupold were very good glass when they came out. Right after I got my ELs I saw an ad for the new NL Pures. I'm afraid to look at them as the ELs were right at the limit of my budget for glass - probably for the rest of my life if my wife finds out.... wink but it's hard to believe glass can get much better than the EL glass, but the reports on the Pures have been pretty positive


Never underestimate your ability to overestimate your ability.
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 376
W
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 376
I had 10x42 EL, 8x32 EL and sold them both for some 12x42 NL Pure. To my eyes, there is a slight difference in glass and clarity, but not significant enough to make the jump for most. I got the 12's because I found the 10's weren't enough for West Texas aoudad hunting. The Pures do feel better in my hands and coupled with a tripod stud and forehead rest are very steady. I still have some 8x30 CL Companions that I use for looking out the pasture.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,577
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,577
Likes: 2
I have had almost every generation of Swarovski and Leica binoculars. I can say that the 8X32 NL Pure is the best yet. That covers optics and ergonomics both.

I have the EL Swarovision rangefinding binoculars in 10X42 and I bought the Leica 8X32 rangefinders to get a smaller package. They are smaller, but I am going to sell them and keep the Swarovskis.

The 8X32 is probably the best all around binocular you can get. Exit pupil on the 8X32 is the same as the 10X42, and the size difference makes the 8X32 the better package.

I have had a lot of binoculars and of what I have left, the 8X32 NL Pure would be the last to go...



[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,474
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,474
Originally Posted by bt8897
I think im just going to order the pures and do a side by side test myself
Good idea. Because your the one who is going to be looking thru them. Im interested in your findings.
I use an older EL 8.5x42 which I love but cant help wonder if a would like an upgrade.


Life can be rough on us dreamers.
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763
If I were to start over, I'd want a nice set of 8x and a set of 12x.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
E
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
E
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
I just really want a pair of 12x42 Pures …

I had a pair of 12x42 Nikons years ago and it was just to hard to hold them still. I hear the Pures are much better and seem like a great western deer hunting setup

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,926
S
SLM Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,926
For me, they are still tripod glass, but do better than EL’s for a “quick look”. IMO, the wider FOV helps hide the shake, but it’s still to much for me, but I’m probably in the minority and don’t even like 10X for handheld.



Originally Posted by elkrazy
I just really want a pair of 12x42 Pures …

I had a pair of 12x42 Nikons years ago and it was just to hard to hold them still. I hear the Pures are much better and seem like a great western deer hunting setup

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,170
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,170
Originally Posted by SLM
For me, they are still tripod glass, but do better than EL’s for a “quick look”. IMO, the wider FOV helps hide the shake, but it’s still to much for me, but I’m probably in the minority and don’t even like 10X for handheld.



Originally Posted by elkrazy
I just really want a pair of 12x42 Pures …

I had a pair of 12x42 Nikons years ago and it was just to hard to hold them still. I hear the Pures are much better and seem like a great western deer hunting setup



I’m interested to hear from the 12x guys how the 12x Pures handle general use and shake compared to Pure 10s. 15x are for tripod but for general use is the 10x preferred over 12x? I hear the Pures are much better to handle less shakes than others due to the FOV but this is only hearsay so I would like to hear from more actual Pure owners. Thanks.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
G
GF1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Has anybody done a serious comparison in the field between the Swarovski NL Pure and the Leica Noctivid, say in 10x42?

I have had and used a 10x42 Noctivid for several years, and it is outstanding, but have no experience with the NL Pure.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,387
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,387
Originally Posted by elkrazy
I just really want a pair of 12x42 Pures …

I had a pair of 12x42 Nikons years ago and it was just to hard to hold them still. I hear the Pures are much better and seem like a great western deer hunting setup

As a long standing supporting vendor here on the forum it is our pleasure to assist in discussing this with you. Please give a call, 516-217-1000, when you have a few moments


Doug @ Camera Land

[email protected]
http://www.cameralandny.com
516-217-1000

Thanks for the support.

[Linked Image from monstermuleys.com]
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 932
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 932
I have 8.5x42 ELs and 10x42 NLs. To be honest I don’t think the price and performance difference between the two warrants getting the NLs. I actually like the eye cups better on the ELs and there’s only the tiniest glass difference between them. Ergonomically the NLs are a little better along with the field of view, but for what you save and what you get with the ELs you won’t go wrong with buying them. My honest opinion.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

639 members (16gage, 007FJ, 16Racing, 12344mag, 160user, 1badf350, 75 invisible), 3,138 guests, and 1,288 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,354
Posts18,487,934
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.120s Queries: 48 (0.008s) Memory: 0.8787 MB (Peak: 0.9633 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 02:05:37 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS