Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Anti Trump Ingraham gets schooled by the Genius Stephen Miller

He promised he would! And that's the whole phhuccking problem. The [bleep] conservative want the gubmint to build Utopian cities! And all you can do is propose to suck his dick! No criticism whatsoever!

Never have I even once intimated that I want religion-based laws in this country (whatever the hell that even means)---stupid. What I have said (without refutation from you---and name-calling isn't refutation) is that this nation was founded free and independent on an appeal to a non-sectarian moral law embodied in "the laws of nature" (unassisted human reason) "and nature's God" (revealed religion). And both are in substantial agreement on what constitutes morality. Moreover, both condemn, among other things, homosexuality as well as virtually the entire moral and social agenda of the Left. Sorry if this bothers you, but the truth of that proposition is not determined by your agreement with it. The Preamble of the Constitution makes explicit reference to our liberties as being "blessings". The liberty that is a "blessing" is one that God thinks is good for you; one he would want you to enjoy. It just so happens that God's conception of that liberty which is a blessing (a biblical one) is also consistent with the Platonic and Aristotelian (the natural law conception) of that liberty which is desirable because moral. Moreover, the history of the Founding is shot-through and through with explicit references that the Founder's believed they were establishing a political and moral order based broadly on non-sectarian Judeo-Christian monotheism, equally supported by Aristotelian rationalism. I'm sorry if this offends you, but if it does, your problem is with the Founders and the God to whom they appealed "for the rectitude of their intentions", not with me.

What an absolute crock of shìt.

What did I say above that is false?

A less spindly and slightly less screechy Ann Coulter

Proposing to build 12 Utopian cities on tax-payer dollars (and with flying cars no less! :D) is precisely the kind of Left-wing, big-government idiocy (which includes his broken-promise on the wall) that caused Coulter to conclude Trump was largely a fraud. As a conservative, how in hell do you defend his proposal? Seriously?

You want a expensive useless wall and you think Horse is a liberal?


Nice work Queenie.

Horse is a liberal? What in hell are you talking about? But there we have it in black and white; [b]you are against the wall and out of your own mouth no less! At least we finally have you out of the closet! You've not denied that you think there is no difference between men and women, or your claim that patriarchy is not a function of biology and we now have you on the record opposing a wall to stop illegal immigration. I don't think you're a Leftist, but it wouldn't be unreasonable to think you are, given the evidence you've supplied us with. But without question, you're dumber than a box of rocks. Do you not understand that the wall is chump-change compared to what illegal immigration is costing us and is going to cost us: it's costing us our country! Moreover, why does the cost of the wall bother you but not 12 utopian cities with flying cars?! Your principles are not in your premises; they are in your conclusions and whatever conclusion helps you save face is the one you defend at the moment. You're political positions are utterly incoherent; they certainly aren't conservative.

Stephen Miller is a star. Much of his work was visible, but lots of his work was "behind the scenes" during Trump's administration. Very glad he stayed with Trump to help us work out of this mess. We are lucky to have him.

Proposing to build 12 Utopian cities on tax-payer dollars (and with flying cars no less! :D) is precisely the kind of Left-wing, big-government idiocy (which includes his broken-promise on the wall) that caused Coulter to conclude Trump was largely a fraud. As a conservative, how in hell do you defend his proposal? Seriously?