Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Chuck Baldwin On Dispensationalism

It takes far more effort and and time to unlearn a falsehood than it does to learn a truth. Baldwin is a proven false prophet, liar, and clown. Keep trying though, you're doing good!

You know more about this guy than I do. What is it in his history that supports the claims you make here?

Baldwin does not kneel before the jews that is the problem JG has with him

Guess again meener. You're a clueless on the subject as TRH is apparently.

Well, I don’t know about a lot else but Chuck Baldwin is one of the only guys to get Romans 13 right and in agreement with our Founders and preachers of that era.

I was asking with genuine interest.

What is it about Chuck Baldwin that makes you accuse him of being a false prophet and liar?

I’m assuming you have something more substantial than the fact he interprets scripture differently than you do?

Suffice it to say he hates all jews, teaches replacement theory with altered and twisted verses and interpretation, and attempts to alter end times prophecy. Right up TRH's alley.

Baldwin is a preterist.........

According to preterism, all prophecy in the Bible is really history. The preterist interpretation of Scripture regards the book of Revelation as a symbolic picture of first-century conflicts, not a description of what will occur in the end times. The term preterism comes from the Latin praeter, meaning “past.” Thus, preterism is the view that the biblical prophecies concerning the “end times” have already been fulfilled—in the past. Preterism is directly opposed to futurism, which sees the end-times prophecies as having a still-future fulfillment.

How many saw Jesus' return in person? Rev 1:7 says that ALL eyes will see him. Did no one think to record the event that preterists say happened? When did the anti-Christ sit in the temple that hasn't existed since 70 AD? Did the world miss the new temple being built?

There is a world of difference between a differing view of interpretation of Scripture and false prophecy.

One can hold a differing view and not be lying.

You accused him of false prophecy (I’m not aware of him claiming to have prophesied anything which is what I thought you were aiming at?) and of lying.

He can misinterpret prophetic texts and not be a false prophet. He can have an understanding of end times that differs from yours and not be a liar.

You do understand this I hope?

Because if you don’t you’re damning most of historic Christians.

Ps- just as there is a wide variety of specific views of end times prophecy and its interpretation amongst Dispensational Premillennialists, there is diversity of opinion on specifics among preterists. These being the least clear of all biblical texts it seems a bit odd to damn others who claim Christ and their sovereign king and lord over differing opinions.

If he's proclaiming these "interpretation" from the pulpit, he is a false prophet.

Jesus was the temple....

Jesus said that no man knows the hour so none of the views are right. We see evidence but it can't be correctly interpreted because that knowledge isn't given to us.

[align:left][/align]Plumbum: That makes about as much sense as some of the other interpretations and explanations I have read on this site. Not much that is.

I tried to watch. I honestly tried. He has damn little knowledge of history. I could not stand to hear him say Palestinian again. It is a made up place and a made up people. I dont think he know hes an idiot. I will try again later.

I knew you hate Baldwin for his stance on the jews cause that is all that matters to you

His body was a temple. So is yours.

Let me add this. If we could get it right messiah would not need to come back. Truth is we are not able to find our way without him. We have had two thousand years, two thousand years. We need him to come back. We need to dump this into his lap again.

You do realize that no one before the 19th century understood eschatology the way you do, and that if you genuinely believe what you say above, you’re condemning the vast majority of Christian preachers all the way back to the beginning of the Church, wherever you may believe that to be?

Hubristic to the -enth, and unbecoming the sinner saved by grace that I’ve always believed you to be.