Sometimes jury nullification works. The facts will be on video. You would have a hard time convincing them you didn’t do it at criminal trial.
Probably best not to risk prison. All you’re hurting them is the cost of a Chinese pos drone. Call the FAA and lake their life hell.
Pay attention. We were discussing a civil case for damages.
Do you think somebody that pursues civil litigation won’t also seek criminal charges?
I guess that’s too big brained for you or you don’t care about going to prison and losing your gun rights and hunting rights.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
At what point does the defense of our lives over ride flying a drone close to us?
Any stranger on the street could have on a suicide vest. Every car could have a bomb in the trunk.
I can avoid a stranger on the street and stay away from traffic. I don't have that option with a drone.
What a rational fear.
Stay in your house.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
Easy ta pick out the liberals on here, that think the chinese spy balloon was perfectly within its rights ta fly over the US.
Not even close. But if I see your truck has tint that’s too dark, or has too much lift, I guess you’d be cool if somebody shot it.
Can't have it both ways, liberal.
And you wouldn't shoot a scumbag rapin your "wife", cause that'd be dischargin a firearm within city limits.
That doesn’t even make sense. It isn’t even an apples to oranges comparison.
Some boomers here have an irrational fear and hatred of drones. Similar to ones that are paranoid of pitbulls.
A drone is just an inanimate object, just like guns. They can be used for good, bad or in most cases simple recreation. I’d have a bigger issue with my city being full of tent camps, prostitutes, and people shooting heroine and leaving dirty needles on the street than I would with someone flying a drone. Especially one that basically amounts to a kids toy.
Some boomers here have an irrational fear and hatred of drones. Similar to ones that are paranoid of pitbulls.
Please don't post the full list, it will crash the server.
No doubt.
The gov misuses drones and will do so more in the future. Just as they misuse a whole lot of other things against us at times. From firearms to the internet. That doesn’t make the object “bad” and isn’t a rational reason to flip the fug out over it an inanimate object that ranges from full sized unmanned fighter jets armed with bombs down to a kids toys.
If someone marketed an emp shell for a 12 gauge I’d buy a case.
applause
just one with limited range and untraceable
The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men. In it is contentment In it is death and all you seek (Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)
I am curious about the legality of filming a person with a droan while hovering over their property because the law says that a person can film anything that their eyes can see from a PUBLIC space, meaning someone can stand on the public sidewalk and aim a camera at you changing in your bedroom if they can see you through the window and legally, but what about doing the same while hovering in the air within their property bounds?
I am curious about the legality of filming a person with a droan while hovering over their property
It varies by state but several have laws prohibiting hovering over private property or filming while passing over for the purpose of "surveillance". A few are stricter. In California, for example, aircraft can't capture images of people on private property for any reason without their consent. A law paid for by celebrities and Bohemian Grove types.
I am curious about the legality of filming a person with a droan while hovering over their property
It varies by state but several have laws prohibiting hovering over private property or filming while passing over for the purpose of "surveillance". A few are stricter. In California, for example, aircraft can't capture images of people on private property for any reason without their consent. A law paid for by celebrities and Bohemian Grove types.
mentioned in my post on rules
"Where a helicopter hovered low over a homeowner’s property while the crew shot video for a news story, the court rejected a trespass claim "
have you paid your dues, can you moan the blues, can you bend them guitar strings
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
At what point does the defense of our lives over ride flying a drone close to us?
Any stranger on the street could have on a suicide vest. Every car could have a bomb in the trunk.
I can avoid a stranger on the street and stay away from traffic. I don't have that option with a drone.
What a rational fear.
Stay in your house.
It's not fear based. It amounts to we as American citizens being denied the ability of an obscure law to defend ourselves. I see though that there is no obvious reason to try to explain anything like that to you as all you have to put out are insults. Typical of a person that favors government control.
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
At what point does the defense of our lives over ride flying a drone close to us?
Any stranger on the street could have on a suicide vest. Every car could have a bomb in the trunk.
I can avoid a stranger on the street and stay away from traffic. I don't have that option with a drone.
What a rational fear.
Stay in your house.
It's not fear based. It amounts to we as American citizens being denied the ability of an obscure law to defend ourselves. I see though that there is no obvious reason to try to explain anything like that to you as all you have to put out are insults. Typical of a person that favors government control.
Find me one example of people in the United States being murdered utilizing a home-use drone. Being able to shoot things you don't like isn't a "right".
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
‘You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money. By just taking the face I.D. chip that’s used in cell phones, and having a small explosive charge and a standard drone, and just have it do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them and explode. You could do that right now... No new technology is needed.’
At what point does the defense of our lives over ride flying a drone close to us?
Any stranger on the street could have on a suicide vest. Every car could have a bomb in the trunk.
I can avoid a stranger on the street and stay away from traffic. I don't have that option with a drone.
What a rational fear.
Stay in your house.
It's not fear based. It amounts to we as American citizens being denied the ability of an obscure law to defend ourselves. I see though that there is no obvious reason to try to explain anything like that to you as all you have to put out are insults. Typical of a person that favors government control.
Find me one example of people in the United States being murdered utilizing a home-use drone. Being able to shoot things you don't like isn't a "right".
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
