|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13 |
A lot of things will work for elk but I prefer 30 cal and above and 200gr and above. The smallest I've used is a 7-08. It worked but I prefer bigger. I tend to subscribe to the Bob Hagel school of thought. Same here, but maybe more of a blend of Page and Hagel since I have really come to like how well the 7 Mashburn Super has worked for me on the last 5-6 elk taken with it. I definitely don't prescribe to needing a 7 or a 30 or a 338. I'd still contend that any elk I have take from 30 yards to a hair over 600 could've been done with a 270 and a good bullet. Or 99 other great cartridges.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 14
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 14 |
I bet if you interviewed 100 hunters that used 308 270 280 30-06 7 RM 300 wm 338 wm or similar
And asked them to honestly answer how many elk you’ve wounded and lost/ wasted.
Compared to:
Those willing to admit their loss/wasted animals by themselves personally or by friends with the use of a 6.5 cm, 243, etc
I bet you would be shocked at the difference.
I have heard of way too many stories of unsuccessful hunters wounding animals, and then going to shoot another because they never recovered the first and wasted it. If hunting regulations worked in a way that you were done the first time you pulled the trigger, you would see people converting to cartridges that provide stronger success rates. This is basically nonsense and is constantly trotted out by the old time “big gun” guys. Small bore shooters won’t admit wounding game any more than big bore guys will and both of them wound game. The main issue is and will continue to be that most people cannot shoot. Most all bullets on the market today will give sufficient penetration to reach the vitals on shots taken from decent angles, regardless of caliber there is something that will work. Having shot game, watched others in my party shoot game, and guided hunters to game, all while keeping notes for a good while now. Having killed game from 75lb to 1500lb with cartridges from .172 to .510 diameter with velocity from over 4000 down to 750 and ranges from single digits to over 500 yards. Using over 50 different bullets of every design imaginable. The ONLY thing that matters is that the vitals get scrambled. No elk, deer, moose, or unicorn cares what made a 2” diameter hole through its lungs. They do not care one bit if that 2” hole was crushed through there by a 250gr flat nosed cast bullet from a 44 magnum or by a 77gr bullet from a 223, they die just the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,085 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,085 Likes: 1 |
Feel free to try to scramble a bull elk’s vitals with a 223. You won’t catch me trying a stunt like that.
With the difficulty of drawing elk tags these days, I want every advantage available. I don’t want to have to pass up a shot because I’m at the wrong angle to slip a too-small bullet into the vitals. Sometimes all you’re presented with is a less than perfect set-up. Then again, you won’t catch me shooting at anything at 800 yards either but people think there’s no problem with that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,575 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,575 Likes: 7 |
I bet if you interviewed 100 hunters that used 308 270 280 30-06 7 RM 300 wm 338 wm or similar
And asked them to honestly answer how many elk you’ve wounded and lost/ wasted.
Compared to:
Those willing to admit their loss/wasted animals by themselves personally or by friends with the use of a 6.5 cm, 243, etc
I bet you would be shocked at the difference.
I have heard of way too many stories of unsuccessful hunters wounding animals, and then going to shoot another because they never recovered the first and wasted it. If hunting regulations worked in a way that you were done the first time you pulled the trigger, you would see people converting to cartridges that provide stronger success rates. This is basically nonsense and is constantly trotted out by the old time “big gun” guys. Small bore shooters won’t admit wounding game any more than big bore guys will and both of them wound game. The main issue is and will continue to be that most people cannot shoot. Most all bullets on the market today will give sufficient penetration to reach the vitals on shots taken from decent angles, regardless of caliber there is something that will work. Having shot game, watched others in my party shoot game, and guided hunters to game, all while keeping notes for a good while now. Having killed game from 75lb to 1500lb with cartridges from .172 to .510 diameter with velocity from over 4000 down to 750 and ranges from single digits to over 500 yards. Using over 50 different bullets of every design imaginable. The ONLY thing that matters is that the vitals get scrambled. No elk, deer, moose, or unicorn cares what made a 2” diameter hole through its lungs. They do not care one bit if that 2” hole was crushed through there by a 250gr flat nosed cast bullet from a 44 magnum or by a 77gr bullet from a 223, they die just the same. Exactly. And I would actually say that, IME hunting with family and friends and guiding clients, "big gun" guys wound more often than "small gun" guys do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 696
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 696 |
Feel free to try to scramble a bull elk’s vitals with a 223. You won’t catch me trying a stunt like that.
With the difficulty of drawing elk tags these days, I want every advantage available. I don’t want to have to pass up a shot because I’m at the wrong angle to slip a too-small bullet into the vitals. Sometimes all you’re presented with is a less than perfect set-up. Then again, you won’t catch me shooting at anything at 800 yards either but people think there’s no problem with that. ⬆️ This is accurate. The investment in scouting trips, packing in/out, time off work for the scouting, and also the hunt, the firearm, shooting practice, any travel involved, tags, the list goes on and on. The investment is huge! Then the shot presented frequently is not as clear as some fantasize about. I would not consider myself old, but elk hunting rarely culminates in a textbook broadside shot for someone to slip their shot in. The bull I got this year was at 90 yards and he was hustling! Waiting for some perfect shot and for him to hold still; he would have disappeared in 40 yards and never been seen again lol. You miss your opportunity here and that bull gets 600 yards away, there will be 4000 trees between you two. Safe to say, I’ll keep hunting with my old guy rifle and drop them, and fill my freezer every single time lol
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 696
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 696 |
I will agree that there are many peeps out there that absolutely do not have enough shooting experience to be proficient in the woods. They will fail with most any firearm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,085 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,085 Likes: 1 |
I bet if you interviewed 100 hunters that used 308 270 280 30-06 7 RM 300 wm 338 wm or similar
And asked them to honestly answer how many elk you’ve wounded and lost/ wasted.
Compared to:
Those willing to admit their loss/wasted animals by themselves personally or by friends with the use of a 6.5 cm, 243, etc
I bet you would be shocked at the difference.
I have heard of way too many stories of unsuccessful hunters wounding animals, and then going to shoot another because they never recovered the first and wasted it. If hunting regulations worked in a way that you were done the first time you pulled the trigger, you would see people converting to cartridges that provide stronger success rates. This is basically nonsense and is constantly trotted out by the old time “big gun” guys. Small bore shooters won’t admit wounding game any more than big bore guys will and both of them wound game. The main issue is and will continue to be that most people cannot shoot. Most all bullets on the market today will give sufficient penetration to reach the vitals on shots taken from decent angles, regardless of caliber there is something that will work. Having shot game, watched others in my party shoot game, and guided hunters to game, all while keeping notes for a good while now. Having killed game from 75lb to 1500lb with cartridges from .172 to .510 diameter with velocity from over 4000 down to 750 and ranges from single digits to over 500 yards. Using over 50 different bullets of every design imaginable. The ONLY thing that matters is that the vitals get scrambled. No elk, deer, moose, or unicorn cares what made a 2” diameter hole through its lungs. They do not care one bit if that 2” hole was crushed through there by a 250gr flat nosed cast bullet from a 44 magnum or by a 77gr bullet from a 223, they die just the same. Exactly. And I would actually say that, IME hunting with family and friends and guiding clients, "big gun" guys wound more often than "small gun" guys do. 😆 I’m sure you’re right, sniper.
Last edited by AZtwins; 02/02/24.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085 |
I wouldn’t shoot any 6.5 at elk. Stubborn like that I guess. I elk hunt with a 225 partition and it drops them immediately. I typically hunt in heavily wooded areas and prefer to not lose my animals because they are wounded and can travel a long way! Can an elk be killed with a 6.5? Yes. Can an elk be lost easily with a 6.5? YES! This conversation usually incites some sort of negative response from someone who has killed an elk with a Creedmoor and wants to compare ballistic charts. For every story someone has about killing a bull with a creedmoor, I have an equal or greater amount of stories for people that have lost one. None of that crap matters for elk hunting. Learn your rifles shooting abilities. It’s that simple. Back to your question: I think either bullet would work fine, as long as the gun shoots them well. I would just prefer a bigger cartridge. A gut or leg shot with a .378 Weatherby is still a bad shot and a lost elk.
"There are no dangerous weapons. There are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085 |
I bet if you interviewed 100 hunters that used 308 270 280 30-06 7 RM 300 wm 338 wm or similar
And asked them to honestly answer how many elk you’ve wounded and lost/ wasted.
Compared to:
Those willing to admit their loss/wasted animals by themselves personally or by friends with the use of a 6.5 cm, 243, etc
I bet you would be shocked at the difference.
I have heard of way too many stories of unsuccessful hunters wounding animals, and then going to shoot another because they never recovered the first and wasted it. If hunting regulations worked in a way that you were done the first time you pulled the trigger, you would see people converting to cartridges that provide stronger success rates. This is basically nonsense and is constantly trotted out by the old time “big gun” guys. Small bore shooters won’t admit wounding game any more than big bore guys will and both of them wound game. The main issue is and will continue to be that most people cannot shoot. Most all bullets on the market today will give sufficient penetration to reach the vitals on shots taken from decent angles, regardless of caliber there is something that will work. Having shot game, watched others in my party shoot game, and guided hunters to game, all while keeping notes for a good while now. Having killed game from 75lb to 1500lb with cartridges from .172 to .510 diameter with velocity from over 4000 down to 750 and ranges from single digits to over 500 yards. Using over 50 different bullets of every design imaginable. The ONLY thing that matters is that the vitals get scrambled. No elk, deer, moose, or unicorn cares what made a 2” diameter hole through its lungs. They do not care one bit if that 2” hole was crushed through there by a 250gr flat nosed cast bullet from a 44 magnum or by a 77gr bullet from a 223, they die just the same. Thank you
"There are no dangerous weapons. There are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,954 Likes: 21
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,954 Likes: 21 |
A gut or leg shot with a .378 Weatherby is still a bad shot and a lost elk. But, but, but....... It's all in the 'knock down power'........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,688 Likes: 46
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,688 Likes: 46 |
A gut or leg shot with a .378 Weatherby is still a bad shot and a lost elk. But, but, but....... It's all in the 'knock down power'........ As far off the rails as this has gotten, you need to know just how and where to hit the chicken to kill it. This diagram shows it doesn’t matter what cartridge or bullet as long as you hits the gizzard..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,303 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,303 Likes: 4 |
nm
Last edited by Brad; 02/03/24.
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13 |
You must be getting old Brad.. I saw what you did there
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,303 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,303 Likes: 4 |
You must be getting old Brad.. I saw what you did there Yeah, a waste of time. "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still!"
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,365 Likes: 13 |
You must be getting old Brad.. I saw what you did there Yeah, a waste of time. "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still!"That's a good piece of advice.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 11
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,062 Likes: 11 |
I can remember reading magazines as a kid and writers were saying you really needed a 338 Win Mag to humanely hunt elk.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,254 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,254 Likes: 3 |
I am a fan of the TTSX. How about the 140 TTSX?¿? RZ.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755 |
Back in the 70's, (back in Texas) I was a big reader of Elmer Keith. I only had a .280 Mod 77 and was convinced it was "marginal" for elk! I was also lusting after the Ruger Tropical in .375 H&H. I figured it would be an "all around" elk rifle and bonus deer rifle. (couldn't afford nothing, but I could dream!) had never even held one , but I felt it was "perfect" for elk. (It was a truck axle, come to find out!) I'd never killed any game by then but deer/hogs, ha. I was on a Wireline Truck one night in 1979. I was on the winch and slow pulling a tool out from 10,000 ft. Took a couple hours. I got in a conversation with an older Gent (40's) we got to talking elk. I just opened with "I would not hunt elk with less than a 375". (Typical 26yr old, ha) He scoffed and told me him an three other buddies went elk hunting very often, up in Colorado. They all used Remington 742/30-06 (very, very popular in that region) and they killed them very easily. In fact he gave several accounts where the quick follow-up shots from the semi-autos came in handy. It helped me get back on the reality trail, ha.
I still like to use Big Guns (anything over .30 cal) on elk, but that's just a personal thing. When I first moved out here in 1990, I always asked the Locals what they used on elk. 30-06/270 and 308 Winchester was a given, followed by 300 Savage, 250/3000 Savage, 25-06, 243, 6mm Remington, and if a Magnum, it was the 7mm RM. Very few used a 300WM or bigger. My first hunting buddy here uses a .308 for everything, and with the 150 Corlokt.
Last edited by Jim_Knight; 02/03/24.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,737
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,737 |
I was the first to buy a rifle and hunt in my family. My influence came from three cousins who had 30-06's and hunted from tree stands in Minnesota forests. My exposure widened as I was helping a church paper sale and discovered Outdoor Life magazines. One parent said I could take the bundled magazines home for a few days and return them before the drive ended. In those magazines, I read stories from a guy name Jack O'Connor and was first exposed to the .270 Winchester. His exploits with sheep and medium game were influential and I began buying magazines off the local newsstand. Now back in the late '60's and early '70's it was mostly frowned upon to hunt elk with the lowly .270 Win., especially by a writer named Elmer Keith. When I had money and time, my first elk hunts were with 300 WM's and 338 WM's which certainly did the job. But fellow hunters were using .270's. 308's and 30-06's and tagged just as many cows and bulls. For the past 25 years, I only hunted elk as I became a student of their habitat and thoroughly enjoyed mountain hunting. So much so that I sold my 40 acre beautiful deer hunting spot. As I got older, the 300's and 338's weren't so kind anymore and in fact became downright difficult to shoot. So I sold them and since have taken cows and bulls with the 308, 30-06, 270Win and yes, the 6.5CM (cow, bull & caribou). Trimming down my rifle options, I may part with two Montana CM's and finish my elk hunting career with the .270 Winchester along with 150 gr. NP's and Accubonds.
Last edited by bigwhoop; 02/03/24.
My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,246 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,246 Likes: 6 |
This guy didn’t think my dad was undergunned with a 7mm-08 and a single 140 AccuBond at 225 yards. This fella didn’t look down on a single 140 Partition from a Mighty-08 either. This guy, on the other hand, went down harder than most from a single 140 Partition from a Mighty-08 at 346 yards. My nephew went up in grade significantly with this bull, with a 10 grain upgrade, to a 150 ELDX out of a Mighty-08, but at 409 yards. I wish I weren’t so undergunned, maybe I could kill more elk. P P.S. Sorry Brad, I couldn’t resist.
Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Member #547 Join date 3/09/2001
|
|
|
|
534 members (10gaugeman, 01Foreman400, 1badf350, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1Longbow, 45 invisible),
2,358
guests, and
1,234
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,334
Posts18,526,750
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|