I recently re-tested my Mark 6 3-18x that has been repaired multiple times by Leupold. When it works, I love it. When it wasn't working, I hated it. I was trying to figure out if my 6.5 PRC barrel gave up the ghost or if it was the Mark 6. Much to my surprise, the Mark 6 is tracking and holding zero at this time.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
The Sightron tested dead on....no easy thing with 1/10" adjustments. It showed a pretty big 'sweet spot' of parallax adjustment (indicative of excellent lens alignment).
The VX-5HD was pretty decent and tested within the limits of the 1/4" adjustments. There was no apparent reticle wander with power changes. The parallax adjustment is fussy....possibly just this individual scope. In a hunting situation, you probably wouldn't notice it.
Of course, the proof is in the shooting. But if they fail on the tester, there's zero sense going any further than that.
A collimator is also an excellent way to check scopes...in some ways it's easier than how I do them.
Thanks for that, Al. Appreciate you sharing your findings.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
The Sightron tested dead on....no easy thing with 1/10" adjustments. It showed a pretty big 'sweet spot' of parallax adjustment (indicative of excellent lens alignment).
The VX-5HD was pretty decent and tested within the limits of the 1/4" adjustments. There was no apparent reticle wander with power changes. The parallax adjustment is fussy....likely just this individual scope. In a hunting situation, you probably wouldn't notice it.
Of course, the proof is in the shooting. But if they fail on the tester, there's zero sense going any further than that.
A collimator is also an excellent way to check scopes...in some ways it's easier than how I do them.
The Sightron tested dead on....no easy thing with 1/10" adjustments. It showed a pretty big 'sweet spot' of parallax adjustment (indicative of excellent lens alignment).
The VX-5HD was pretty decent and tested within the limits of the 1/4" adjustments. There was no apparent reticle wander with power changes. The parallax adjustment is fussy....possibly just this individual scope. In a hunting situation, you probably wouldn't notice it.
Of course, the proof is in the shooting. But if they fail on the tester, there's zero sense going any further than that.
A collimator is also an excellent way to check scopes...in some ways it's easier than how I do them.
For what it's worth....
Al,
Thanks for providing your feedback on these scopes, as well as all of your other insight and experience that you share. Much appreciated.
Bob
Last edited by Akbob5; 02/17/24.
Bob Enjoy life now -- it has an expiration date. ~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
The Sightron tested dead on....no easy thing with 1/10" adjustments. It showed a pretty big 'sweet spot' of parallax adjustment (indicative of excellent lens alignment).
The VX-5HD was pretty decent and tested within the limits of the 1/4" adjustments. There was no apparent reticle wander with power changes. The parallax adjustment is fussy....likely just this individual scope. In a hunting situation, you probably wouldn't notice it.
Of course, the proof is in the shooting. But if they fail on the tester, there's zero sense going any further than that.
A collimator is also an excellent way to check scopes...in some ways it's easier than how I do them.
For what it's worth....
These guys are pretty interesting...
Interesting video. James seems very knowledgeable, and I was buying everything he was selling right up to the point I saw Keith Warren.