Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire National Geographic Used To Be Such A Great Magazine!

Apparently their subscriber base has changed substantially. Grooming kids is now their thing.

Our friends who don't celebrate Christmas took it over.

Watch the first 5 minutes, or-
Ruth Paine a proven CIA agent and direct descendant of Thomas Paine. She was deeply involved in setting up Lee Harvey Oswald as the patsy for the JFK assassination . She went on numerous National Geographic 'projects' around the world.
NatGeo has been a CIA spy operation since its inception. A lot of 'real stuff' has to be produced in order to gain the trust of foreign governments- then the covert operations can begin.

Same answer.

Gross. Only thing missing is a set of goat horns sticking out of his forehead.

WTF is a “Trans indigenous artist”?

Jeezus save me!!

Chit no longer good enough to grace the reading pile in the chitter.

I used to have a collection of NatGeo magazines dating back to 1910, IIRC, given to me by my grandmother. THE most interesting to me were those printed during WWI. One with a full section with pics and directions on growing Victory Gardens. Pretty cool stuff. Stolen some time during my endless moves as a young man.

Nobody grows breasts like Africans.

Honestly, now that there's free porn on the internet, who needs those glossy photos of native titties?

Nat Geo really went to hell with that ado about Jesse Jackson’s grandmother posing topless .

By the time I first read it as a kid, it was solidly known as an old (1800s) and well-established geographic/scientific magazine which tried to deliver its content and messages with great photography. One solid family, the Grosvenors, was prominent in the leadership during all of the 50 or so years I read it.

As with so many fine establishments serving excellent purposes, the succeeding generations of leadership/ownership diluted and polluted the fundamental purposes. Just more of the same stuff we are seeing so regularly.

Gave up on National Geographic years ago. I kept a subscription to Smithsonian magazine for another year or two until they started doing social justice propaganda every issue.

Symptoms of a decaying society. Academia and the scientific community are politically weaponized.

Would be interesting to see a timeline with who owned/controlled it beside a graph of content.

Jews/papist/Mormon for the win. I read the mags as a kid, and a lot of their books. There is no such thing anymore as detached scholarly work.

Now days its podcasts rather than printed media…

Check out shawn ryan show.

scumload: Not only are you ignorant and useless you are a pervert!
A recent P/M to me, concerning you, described YOU as "more irritating than a booger that won't flick"!
I laughed a long time over that one, and am pleased to pass along that very relevant (disgusting!) description of YOU!
He-he.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

Auk1124: My thoughts and my actions exactly!
I think it was nearly 20 years ago I cancelled them myself.
Sad in a way. I learned a lot about the world from them.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

One of my high school class rooms had the stacks from day 1 and I almost bought a complete set back in the mid 70's for about $150. I was a reader up until about 10 years back. They went from lengthy features with some depth to 1 or two page snapshots and I lost interest. I think one can acquire a complete set on DVD's for reasonable price.

Now in retirement, I'm searching the world for mid 1700's to about the 1920's books on exploration and discovery. Back then it took literally months to get to ones jump off points. Need to get another bookcase this year.

When I buy the farm, the kid will likely route those volumes to the dump.

Good example of a very frontal smackdown in response to a sleazy smear.

Rockin a killer stash,it is.