24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 50 of 64 1 2 48 49 50 51 52 63 64
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Nice church tikkanut…! 👊🏻


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 30,816
Likes: 14
T
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
T
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 30,816
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by antlers
Nice church tikkanut…! 👊🏻



Thanx......you're correct

Wake up to this and say.....

'Must be a God'

I go to 'Church' often......

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


T R U M P W O N !

U L T R A M A G A !

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by antlers
I think it might be possible that there are ways to be a good atheist, but trying to deny the existence of well-established historical documents is not one of em’.

“This is not even an issue for scholars of antiquity.... The reason for thinking Jesus existed is because he is abundantly attested in early sources.... If you want to go where the evidence goes, I think that atheists have done themselves a disservice by jumping on the bandwagon of mythicism, because frankly, it makes you look foolish to the outside world”. - famed (atheist) historian Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman was still a Christian when that was recorded.

You like to focus on 4 gospels, but in total we have portions, or complete copies of over 60 gospels and know of another 40+ from citations from other written works. It's interesting how you don't accept the other 96+ and their fantastical tales, but this is part of the evidentiary fabric regarding the historical reliability of gospels.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Seems you are again in full retreat…. Can’t back up your allegations….unable to participate in any sort of rational discussion.

Sorry you missed the point, guess I couldn’t dumb it down enough for you to either understand or offer any sort of thoughtful reply.

Meh…

You didn't "dumb it down", you created a straw man.


Nope, don’t think so. Just tried to illustrate ….that one need not know HOW something was made to know THAT it was made.

Seems he either can’t admit that….or….?….who knows….

So….here we are again…. Must we know HOW something is made to know THAT it exists?

Simple question….

You're conflating exists with "being made" by a sentient being. They are not synonymous.



Nope…. Keep the concept simple…..if one sees, holds and something….does that one need to know how it came into existence to KNOW it exists?

Just stick to the basic point….

Say did you just try to insert a “straw man” here?

Regarding you comment about conflating…are trying to make a case that something can be “made” without the involvement of a sentient being?


Edit to add: gotta get some sleep….will check on this tomorrow


Nope:

From The Century Dictionary

made
mād
noun

Created; wrought; fabricated; constructed.

Artificially produced; formed independently of natural development: as, made ground (ground made up of earth from another place); a made word.
Drawn from various sources; formed of several parts or ingredients: as, a made dish; composite; built up: as, a made mast (a mast composed of several sticks bound together by iron hoops, in contradistinction to a single-spar mast).

Concocted; invented; fictitious: as, a made-up tale or excuse.


Your many words simply divert from the main issue…

So, you seem to have hinted at something and I would like to see some clarification from you….

If one is confronted with something that is been “made” or “fashioned”…..can one conclude that a sentient being was involved in the action act if “making” it?

Words have meaning.

You are intentionally conflation words with different meanings to confuse the point.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Bart Ehrman was still a Christian when that was recorded.
He was STILL a world renowned expert on the New Testament manuscripts in their ORIGINAL language too.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by TF49
Seems you are again in full retreat…. Can’t back up your allegations….unable to participate in any sort of rational discussion.

Sorry you missed the point, guess I couldn’t dumb it down enough for you to either understand or offer any sort of thoughtful reply.

Meh…

You didn't "dumb it down", you created a straw man.


Nope, don’t think so. Just tried to illustrate ….that one need not know HOW something was made to know THAT it was made.

Seems he either can’t admit that….or….?….who knows….

So….here we are again…. Must we know HOW something is made to know THAT it exists?

Simple question….

You're conflating exists with "being made" by a sentient being. They are not synonymous.



Nope…. Keep the concept simple…..if one sees, holds and something….does that one need to know how it came into existence to KNOW it exists?

Just stick to the basic point….

Say did you just try to insert a “straw man” here?

Regarding you comment about conflating…are trying to make a case that something can be “made” without the involvement of a sentient being?


Edit to add: gotta get some sleep….will check on this tomorrow


Nope:

From The Century Dictionary

made
mād
noun

Created; wrought; fabricated; constructed.

Artificially produced; formed independently of natural development: as, made ground (ground made up of earth from another place); a made word.
Drawn from various sources; formed of several parts or ingredients: as, a made dish; composite; built up: as, a made mast (a mast composed of several sticks bound together by iron hoops, in contradistinction to a single-spar mast).

Concocted; invented; fictitious: as, a made-up tale or excuse.


Your many words simply divert from the main issue…

So, you seem to have hinted at something and I would like to see some clarification from you….

If one is confronted with something that is been “made” or “fashioned”…..can one conclude that a sentient being was involved in the action act if “making” it?

Words have meaning.

You are intentionally conflation words with different meanings to confuse the point.
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Bart Ehrman was still a Christian when that was recorded.
He was STILL a world renowned expert on the New Testament manuscripts in their ORIGINAL language too.

And he still is today.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Bart Ehrman did NOT lose his faith because of anything IN the Bible or because of anything ABOUT the Bible. He has made that abundantly clear. Bart Ehrman lost his faith because he couldn’t resolve a good and loving God with the pain and suffering in the world. He has made that abundantly clear as well.

One he lost his faith, he THEN went looking for ‘proof’ and reasons to substantiate his new beliefs ~ a crystal clear case of confirmation bias.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by antlers
Bart Ehrman did NOT lose his faith because of anything IN the Bible or because of anything ABOUT the Bible. He has made that abundantly clear. Bart Ehrman lost his faith because he couldn’t resolve a good and loving God with the pain and suffering in the world. He has made that abundantly clear as well.

One he lost his faith, he THEN went looking for ‘proof’ and reasons to substantiate his new beliefs ~ a crystal clear case of confirmation bias.

Why Bart lost his faith was not part of my argument, just his scholarship, and the clip I chose was from his days as a Christian, so you're arguing with yourself.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,556
Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,556
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by RHClark
Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by AKCHOPPER
Why is it the ones who are believers seem to be the rudest of the bunch here.? You would think the Christians would practice what they preach (pun intendent}.
Like I said, I think religion is a good thing for some people, it's the zealots I cannot stand, and the ones that look down at people that don't believe. I can only imagine how many non believers that are here that are afraid to post on this thread.

We came from somewhere, I firmly believe that it's so complex that our minds are not capable of ever knowing. However, I don't think wishing or hoping something is true will make it so. .02
A lot of posts from non-believers would have to be ignored for one to agree believers are the rudest of the bunch. I do agree with you about zealotry, though....atheism often going without recognition of having more than it's fair share. Like any statement of bigotry, the litmus test is changing the target of the statement and re-reading it. Would the tone and implication still be disrespectful or offensive? The assumed entitlement to speak without any level of courtesy or respect is shared by many, with theism/atheism having nothing to do with it.

People are rude here because they can get away with saying whatever they want. Nobody is rude when it could result in a punch in the mouth. There's no monopoly on rudeness here.
Kindly explain how a punch in the mouth is an appropriate response to speech that you decide is rude.


NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Why Bart lost his faith was not part of my argument,…
It was part of mine. His clear confirmation bias after he lost his faith is an important consideration.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
…just his scholarship, and the clip I chose was from his days as a Christian, so you're arguing with yourself.
Hardly. As Bart Ehrman concedes to this very day, there is a staggeringly large amount of evidence to suggest that Jesus clearly existed.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Why Bart lost his faith was not part of my argument,…
It was part of mine. His clear confirmation bias after he lost his faith is an important consideration.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
…just his scholarship, and the clip I chose was from his days as a Christian, so you're arguing with yourself.
Hardly. As Bart Ehrman concedes to this very day, there is a staggeringly large amount of evidence to suggest that Jesus clearly existed.

I don't believe that's an accurate representation of his position, and even if it was, that's fine, he and I can have different interpretations of the implication of the facts at hand. Either way, the 4 gospels remain anonymous works.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
I don't believe that's an accurate representation of his position,…
Of course you don’t. You’ve arrived at your beliefs based on what you find attractive; your beliefs have zero to do with proof.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
…and even if it was, that's fine, he and I can have different interpretations of the implication of the facts at hand. Either way, the 4 gospels remain anonymous works.
And you and I can have different interpretations of the implications of the facts at hand as well.

There’s NO WAY that you can be certain that Homer was the actual author of the Iliad. And there’s NO WAY that you can be certain that Herodotus was the actual author of History. And there’s NO WAY that you can be certain that Plato was the actual author of Tetralogies. And there’s NO WAY that you can be certain that Caesar was the actual author of Gallic Wars.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,497
Incidentally, Iliad was written in 800 BC and the earliest manuscript we have dates to 400 BC. That’s a time gap of 400 years…! And History was written between 480 - 425 BC and the earliest manuscript we have dates to the 10th century. That’s a time gap of 1,350 years…! And Tetralogies was written in 400 BC and the earliest manuscript we have dates to 895. That’s a time gap of 1,300 years…! And Gallic Wars was written between 100 - 44 BC and the earliest manuscript we have dates to the 9th century. That’s a time gap of 950 years…!

The New Testament was written between 50 - 100 AD and the earliest manuscript we have dates to no later than 130 AD. That’s a time gap of 40 years.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,396
WFR Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,396
Absolutely Yes!

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,898
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,898
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by RHClark
Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by AKCHOPPER
Why is it the ones who are believers seem to be the rudest of the bunch here.? You would think the Christians would practice what they preach (pun intendent}.
Like I said, I think religion is a good thing for some people, it's the zealots I cannot stand, and the ones that look down at people that don't believe. I can only imagine how many non believers that are here that are afraid to post on this thread.

We came from somewhere, I firmly believe that it's so complex that our minds are not capable of ever knowing. However, I don't think wishing or hoping something is true will make it so. .02
A lot of posts from non-believers would have to be ignored for one to agree believers are the rudest of the bunch. I do agree with you about zealotry, though....atheism often going without recognition of having more than it's fair share. Like any statement of bigotry, the litmus test is changing the target of the statement and re-reading it. Would the tone and implication still be disrespectful or offensive? The assumed entitlement to speak without any level of courtesy or respect is shared by many, with theism/atheism having nothing to do with it.

People are rude here because they can get away with saying whatever they want. Nobody is rude when it could result in a punch in the mouth. There's no monopoly on rudeness here.
Kindly explain how a bunch in the mouth is an appropriate response to speech that you decide is rude.

Well, there's rude then there's punch in the mouth rude. Not too hard to tell the difference around here. The first one will just get rude back, the second one gets you knocked on your ass.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
Originally Posted by antlers
We hear it over and over and over and over again from the same old skeptics here with an agenda, “The Gospels can’t be accurate because they were written so long after Jesus.”

That’s no different than saying, “Nobody today can write accurately about the presidency of Ronald Reagan because it happened so long ago.”

Those two statements are literally the same.

The Gospel of Mark (for example) was written closer to Jesus’ time than we are to the time of Reagan’s presidency.

Meh...the gospels are anonymous and not eyewitness accounts. You're trying to invent credibility to your case by using an invalid comparison - you must be weak in your faith to flounder with failed attempts at reasonable justification.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by CCCC
Originally Posted by ERK
Here’s my two cents worth. I was raised Catholic but since then nothing one way or the other.
Now about a month ago I had a thought so evil that I came to a realization. There has to be an evil spirit or devil to put such thoughts into an average fellow. Because of this I now know there must be a God.
You guys can argue all you want about stuff like heaven or hell but after this happened I know there is a greater power. The End! Edk
That is most understandable.

You suffer from the same delusion. What's a greater power? You two use the same definitions or like the warm and fuzzy that it gives you irrespective?

(BTW, you'll need to have a quiet chat with antlers about sentence structure - he provided one without a valid arguement and I had to edit it for him to strong man his arguement. Haven't heard from him since.)
Mauserand9 what a faker you are - the delusional hypocrite - constantly trying to invent some basis for your attacks. This is another fail.

To tell a person that what he says is understandable is a statement about analysis and comprehension - that the message makes some sense. That has nothing to do with definitions, a greater power, argument, support or denial of a position. How sick must you be to feel that your made up stuff can be a basis on which to attack others? That is bona fide delusion. Check your false spelling of argument and be careful about the sticky paper.

Meh...sharing someone else's delusion adds nothing to its significance or importance. Deflecting and avoidance are very telling however, and your modus operandi. You act like a noisy blind moth around an imaginary flame.
You are plagiarizing - merely repeating what so many have noticed in your behavior and posted here. It's the "looking in the mirror" effect. If it were your self-criticism it could be a good sign - but unlikely. What was that elementary school playground word - copycat?

LOL!!! Another Class Clown fail. If you'd spent less time being a wanker you may have achieved something purposeful in your life - being a troll must suck.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,911
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,911
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Meh...the gospels are anonymous and not eyewitness accounts.

Careful, don't get any of this on you, Daddy Satan won't be happy.

https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/the-apostles-wrote-the-gospels-as-eyewitness-accounts/


I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children may live in peace. ~~ Thomas Paine
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,912
Likes: 14
W
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
W
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,912
Likes: 14
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,911
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,911
I'm going to throw a wrench into this whole mess.

I'm not just a copy cat believer in God and Jesus and the Holy Spirit like so many so-called christians. I've had PLENTY of time under a welding hood to ponder things over the last 40 years burning wire, including this subject.

I believe in spiritual destiny. That being everyone of us is here for a reason and on the exact path we are supposed to follow. The good, the bad, the indifferent, and the downright evil m'effers. Everything, and everyone is interconnected and what we do with our lives matters to those we come in contact with, however that is across the span of our lives. Maybe we don't see it, maybe we will never even know it, but it all matters. When God's Grace happens, and good things are bestowed upon us, or someone else, we are supposed to recognize it and be grateful. When something bad happens, we are supposed to look at it, in it, around it, for something, anything that has meaning to our own individual existence here, and do what we can to help those that have been hurt.

If you can't fathom any of that with an open free thinking mind, without it being spelled out in every minute detail ad nauseum, then you need to go spend your own 40 years under a welding hood. Your existence here, and the life you are living, is not random, or irrelevant.

I also believe this Great Nation was founded with Divine Providence. How else could a rag tag bunch of farmers defeat the most powerful and well funded military force on the planet, and go on to devise the best and most fair system of self governance ever thought up in the history of mankind. That was squarely the hand of God.

I am perfectly content with my beliefs.


I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children may live in peace. ~~ Thomas Paine
Page 50 of 64 1 2 48 49 50 51 52 63 64

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

460 members (10ring1, 1lesfox, 10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 12344mag, 16gage, 55 invisible), 2,585 guests, and 1,184 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,366
Posts18,488,173
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.238s Queries: 55 (0.024s) Memory: 0.9395 MB (Peak: 1.0714 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 04:02:55 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS