Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Do You Believe In God ?

Believe in god on this site, now that's funny. Believing in god and acting according to the bible are two completely different things.

"I don't know therefore GOD"
"It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD."
"It's so wonderous therefore GOD."
"Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD."

How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments.

Living in a false world you are.

Must be a pervert, sex, sex motions, yup a pervert.

Earlybrd they mention you in the bible.

Believing is simple. The devil believes.

I SEE RODTHEWAD IS STILL FLAPPIN HIS LIPS, PUT THE MAGGOT ON IGNORE GUYS HES JUST BAITING YOU

The devil lives here. the devil is in all of you. Lost souls that can't find their way, how sad.

Yep , here comes more name calling. that all you losers have.

i guess he answered me but then i dont care. wonder if hes one of the FBY paid [bleep] stirers

Yahweh Yes

"The Gospel is foolishness to them that are perishing".

so very true,

"I don't know therefore NO GOD"
"It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD."
"It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD."
"Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD."

How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments.

The fact remains that it is evidence that justifies a conviction of truth, and as we have zero evidence for the existence of any of the countless versions of God and gods that people have believed in and worshipped, there is no reason to be convinced that any of them exist.

Which is where faith and its drivers, the promise of eternal life, desire for meaning, fear of annihilation, etc, comes into play.

And again, what is written in old scrolls about God or gods is not evidence for their existence.

Faith, despite your protests, is a belief held without the support of evidence.

Why don't you have a discussion about the fact that sure evidence for one individual may not serve as any evidence for another, and the forever subjectivity of that matter. It might illuminate the futility of these puerile yakking matches.

I made no such argument, no would I say such as argument disproves a god(s), merely that such arguments are not good arguments for a god(s).

I position here always has been, and remains " I see no good evidence for the existence of a god(s)."

Yes, our universe if vast and wonderous. It experiences a period of rapid inflation a bit over 13 billion years ago. That does not mean the expansion started from a true "nothing", nor does it mean it was done by a old white haired due in a toga living outside space/time.

Yes, Science doesn't have all the answers, but we're working on real answers and not relying on bronze age fairytales.

Nobody is making that argument.