Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire More folks stating the baltimore bridge was cyber

I remember after E. Palestine OH, train derailments were in the news all the time. Now they're not - doesn't change the fact that the US averages 3 of them a day...

The sky is falling...............well, bridges and trains at least.

A question:

Why do the conspiracy theorists want this to be an "attack?"

The consequences of such an attack would be serious...

Very.

As in world changing?

3 derailments a day with the environmental and public health implications?

That’s scary as Fück

In my lifetime - I've never seen the DNC fail to use such a thing, a tragedy, to garner more control over US citizens. Be it a new hoop to jump through or a tax or whatever.

If the conspiracy is that this was cyber, we know about it and aren't saying - do you really believe they'd not use this as a precursor to putting more regulation on the average American?

Enhanced TWIC cards or some form of monitoring/reporting to the .gov etc? There's been zero calls for any of it or even no calls to "reduce our reliance on fossil fuels - instead of that diesel/electric boat - all electric".

I’m still reeling from the GloboHomoNaziPedoJewCabal that has set hundreds of wildfires, recruited and brainwashed all these folks for mass shootings (not to mention the crisis actors), and blowed up all the food production facilities.

Now the bridges!?!?!


Oy Vey……We’re gonna die.

If you look at this board, the argument is essentially for a type of isolationism.

So, if you want that, this being an "attack," cyber or otherwise, is antithetical to their desires.

Ironically, the accident theory suits their ends much better.

Odd.

Vast majority of derailments are very localized in nature and don't have much impact other than gouging up the dirt and tracks. But the train still comes off the rails - a lot.

I get it. But from what I understand the derailment in E Palestine involved pretty hazardous material. I’d say that warrants coverage? Unless that’s happening 3 times a day then it’s a severely under reported slice of modern American life

It's a contest to see who can come off as more cynical, jaded, and all-knowing about what's really going on.

Painting done in 1945. 5 yrs ago Q said, bridge will be hit. Q is modern day Nostradamus.

We need incoming ariel post to clear this up.

IMHO, it gives them another conspiracy theory to agonize and obsess over... It provides a distraction from their boring, routine everyday lives.

Just my two cents... Cheers!

First? At what time could any people trust their government? Even the people of the US?

Theories abound, back to the 19'th century.

We blew up the Maine.
We let the Japs bomb Pearl Harbor.
We killed JFK
We orchestrated 9-11
We organized Benghazi to take out a whistle blower.
etc,
etc

Hell, I might even give credence to a couple of these.

But the Dali, No fugging way. It crashed in the most spectacular way possible. But it was a one in a million chance that it would work out that way.

Killing power to the vessel, which probably could have been done remotely, certainly gave no guarantee she would take out the bridge. The most likely scenario would have been a dead vessel in the harbor channel.

Experts have already told us that such a vessel has no steering without the screw turning. It is thrust of the prop against the rudder that moves the stern over. Without the engines, the ship could not be steered into the bridge support.

If a terrorist wanted to assure a catastrophic event, he would max out power and take control of steering. He would leave nothing to chance.

Nope - agree. E Palestine was hazmat and the burning of it wasn't smart. Just saying, after that every little bump and bruise of a train was reported like it "all of the sudden was happening" - nope. Always had been happening, small scale, sometimes large. Same will be for boats for a while. That's all I'm saying.

Mishaps happen - rarely are they massive in scale but when one is - that then heightens awareness of all mishaps in that mode and it becomes a constant barrage of "sky is falling -we're under attack!"

One engineer stated 30 seconds top before emergency generator powered up back up rudder hydraulics. Cyber attack is a red herring to dismiss any possibility of intentional act. 45’ draft at 8 knots would not suddenly turn either way. But it did according to one video of the reported track. 5 minutes straight ahead clears the danger. Why did the ship steer into the bridge instead? A natural question and obvious isn’t conspiratorial.

Agreed. Funny how China owns and manages the Dali and Joey never mentioned it.

It conforms with their "We are under attack" narrative, and victim mentality.

To be accurate - an investment holding company based in Hong Kong owns the company that owns the ship out of Singapore and the management company out of Singapore. It was chartered to a Dutch company and US pilots were on it when it hit the bridge.

It's the End of The World.

Jesus is coming for you!