Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire DEA agent gets us 1 step closer to ending drug use

Cause the female bicyclist is now incapable of using/selling.

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/crime/2024/05/07/dea-agent-fatal-crash/73542632007/

So why do you support the dea agent negligently killing someone and suffering no consequences?

If they were a drug addict, I personally would have ZERO issues with that, whatsoever.

They'll just end up killing them selves with an overdose, and may end up taking someone with them.

If they want to risk death, to just get high? Let them knock themselves out.

Addendum:

Just read the article.... this happened up in Salem here in Oregon. I Doubled down on what I've posted above.

If she was high and got hit, ashes to ashes... dust to dust. At 53 she should know better. But they favor drug addicts in Oregon courts over people who aren't drug addicts. If I was riding a bike and I'm not a drug user, but I got hit by a drug addict who was high, I'd bet 10 to 1 He'd WALK, and they would consider it as my TuffSchidtt.

She wasn't doing anything wrong, the dea agent was negligent.

Some of you guys have problems with reading comprehension. She was not high, the agent was supposedly surveilling a fentanyl dealer in the area, ran a stop sign and hit her. That is inexcusable.

^^^^^^^
Nuff said

Kenneth

The agent had fallen behind several other DEA vehicles on surveillance pursuit and instead of calling for location updates etc., he initiated a high-speed, no alarms-no lights chase to catch up. By his own admission he went through red lights and stop signs without slowing or stopping, and finally hit a 53-year old woman riding her bike home from work. She had nothing to do with the drug case - just an innocent bystander of sorts. Pretty tragic from any perspective and definitely not humorous.

You read the article, yet still posted the addendum? Do you wish for us to question your ability to read; or comprehend?

I'd love to hear Paul's response...

quoting for posterity...

earlybrd & Seafire are dancing on the grave of an innocent woman.

what ever.. If I was wrong then so I was wrong.. from what I read that is how I saw it. I have no patience with the tolerance for drug use in this state.

You guys complaining on my response don't live in this state, but I do. So I see this in a bigger picture than you do, if nothing else but experience.

If I am wrong, the world has my apology. But none of you guys know if she was an innocent woman or not.

“Prosecutors say Landis acknowledged he ran a stop sign at High and Leslie streets SE and had no lights or siren on when he hit Marganne Allen while she was riding her bike home from work on March 28, 2023.

Allen, 53, died at nearby Salem Health hospital”

I’ll go out on a limb here and say that since legal is attempting a QI defense, they haven’t been able to come up with anything to charge her with.

She was innocent. She was not charged and proven guilty of any crime in this instance. That is in our Constitution.

Naw, she looks like a druggy. And she was on a bike.

Guilty!!!



https://www.kplctv.com/video/2023/0...cyclist-videos-reveal-new-details-crash/

This retard's vote counts the same as mine...

Dude, the article even states she had nothing to do with the surveillance.....Comprende?

Dude, the article even states she had nothing to do with the surveillance.....Comprende?

LE can legally violate traffic law in the performance of their duties but just like the fire truck is legally liable for blowing through a stop sign and hitting a car legally entering the intersection this agent is legally liable for running over someone legally entering the intersection in question.

Sounds to me more like a civil case for damages instead of criminal.

And it illustrates the stupidity of bicycle riding on roads used by motor vehicles. Take a watch on youtube of Dr. McGuff's 12 black swans to avoid.

It is bizarre that he may not face charges. I say lock him up.

Whar if a Domino's driver ran the stop sign to be on time?
Or a truck driver, UPS guy, parts runner, how about someone hauling a heart for transplant?

Would they be charged? Criminally?
A cop on duty is no damn different than them.
Unless he is. On a mission with imminent life or death factors.


The 4th car, in a surveillance team that's not going to do anything real that day.
He isn't much different than one going for coffee and donuts. At least not in the realm of breaking laws and putting everyone at risk.

And we know a cop on a lunch run wouldn't break the speed limits or run stop signs.
After all, he punishes citizens for doing those things.
In the name of safety.




And we get to what gets me really wound up in shooting cases.

We have someone who everyone should at least agree used very poor decision making. Then performed very subpar.

I'll bet that just like in a few of those shootings where it's obvious the cop performed poorly. But (sometimes at that moment) the shooting was understandable.

They never seem to say,
"Officer. At that particular moment, shooting was a logical response. You will not be charged. However! It's also apparent that you handled the situation very poorly. That your performance led to the situation in which the shooting occurred. In light of all of this, it's been determined that you can not be a cop in our jurisdiction. And we would suggest you find a new career field."


Which is exactly how civilian HR would treat anyone who fudged up.
For things much smaller than a death.
A truck driver, backing into a very bad delivery, breaks a $1000 mirror,
is going to be punished.
Punishment will result in a permanent ding on his record. Likely forfeit a bonus.
The dings add up, and after a couple he is unemployed.