Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Bush's Legacy....I'd Vote For Him A 3rd Time, If I Could!!

Nah...His first post and his incohernet, non-factual,non-thinking ramblings thereafter did.

That Ok with you??

So all an American worker has to do is perform the labor of 20 Chinese and it'll all work out, eh?

Well,... I guess so,..but then, I've been reading stuff from you and Steve_NO for quite some time,.. so I'm used to it.

Maybe you just have a problem with rational discourse...I know...it's much easier to talk politics with people who 'agree' with you...it's more difficult to discuss politics with those who disagree with you. So, you resort to insulting me...instead of open minded criticism of my posts. It's easy to insult others over the internet because you don't have to deal with the repurcussions. If 'you' respect 'this' President, and 'you' want to obtain the unobtainable, at all deplorable costs to the people of this country...then go ahead. I don't.

Antler,

Just as I thought,you are a pro gay marriage,pro abotion,anti Judeo-Christian leftist.

Does it disturb you how transparent you are? You really must try harder to fit in before you succede in gaining any influence here.

Maybe you could tell us about handloading with your 'partner'.

Well maybe that's a bad idea since this is a family site.

Translation:

There's two kinds of people in the world,.. surly dentists from Alabama,.. and homos.

You are wrong...I realize you would rather discuss these things with people who 'agree' with you...that takes no effort...no cognitive exercise. How about discussing these things with someone who disagrees with you...without personal attacks and insults to the poster 'who doesn't go along with the herd'.

Bristoe,

That is a grossly simplistic.

You left out jewish illumunati and neocon lawyers.

How about 'you' state your opinions...and I'll state mine, and let's go on from there...without personal attacks and insults directed at members here?

antlers,

I am not part of your imaginary herd, such as the ones that exist at DailyKos. The way you came onto this forum was considered a personal attack by many who have been members longer than I. Most here don't agree with Bristoe and we trade insults all the time but it is in good fun and livens things up. And although I rarely agree with Bristoe I still respect him. You did not come here except to try to stir things up and now that you have you whine. Go home if you have one.

Qtip
Soli Deo Gloria!

As a matter of fact, 'you' took what the original poster said, and what I said, out of context...period. Insulting me, and calling me names doesn't make you right, either! Distorting the truth comes natural to Bush, so 'your' tactics don't surprise me either.

Well, at least we can say he's the worst in a couple generations.......





GW Bush is the most handled president in American history....He sure did have a lot of brains--unfortunately, none of them were his.......



Casey

Yeah...it sucks when somebody on the other side makes a valid point...doesn't it? The truth is what it is...like it or not.

"Incoherent, non-factual, non-thinking ramblings"...you must be describing President Bush. You hit the nail on the head.

It's the latest strategy--the best way to get the Clone Of Bush elected this November is to remake Bush.....by rewriting history.........





Casey

Are 'you' so insecure, and so inadequate, that you have to tear others down in order to build yourself up? Insulting others doesn't make 'you' right...not by a long shot. Is this a true 'discussion' forum, or not?

Did James Earl Carter get written out of the history books, as if in some Stalinesque purge? If you go look up "naive" in the dictionary, you'll find a picture of our 39th President.

Mr Antlers,

Earlier when addressing another forum member you said:

"Maybe you just have a problem with rational discourse...I know...it's much easier to talk politics with people who 'agree' with you........".

Since I have been trying to follow your reasoning here and would like to engage in, (as you put it) "rational discourse" with you.

Will you please provide specific examples of when the President acted in the manner that you allege in the following statement?

"why would a parent teach their child to respect a president who is a liar, a thief, a moron, a puppet, and a mass murderer"?

The thread is about 'Bush's Legacy'...others were giving their opinions...I didn't consider them a personal attack, even though their opinions differed greatly from mine. So...how could me stating my opinions be considered a personal attack by anybody? That's a weak argument. Stirring things up, as you say, without personally attacking or insulting anybody here...and instead of open-minded criticism of my posts...I get 'you' with your "go home if you have one" comments. Maybe 'you' don't want discussion...maybe 'you' just want 'agreement' with your opinions.

actually, antler, there is a lively political discourse here....running the spectrum from capitalist anarchists, through every stripe of libertarian, Randist, paleo-con, neo-con, moderate, and even a few sane lefties. We have a dedicated anti-Bush crowd, as well as several varieties of anti-war folks. We engage in civilized, mostly reasoned debate....occasionally enlightening each other, rarely changing minds but enjoying the exercise.


what we don't have, and don't need, is people who don't share our sport, who come in here spouting silly juvenile slogans from leftie web sites on their very first post, and pretty much go downhill from there.