Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters Question for John Barsness on the TSX

I mean no ill words here, but I much respect Mule Deer's opinion due to his credentials and his years of writings/publications. The man helped write a book on bullets. I dont need much more than that.

His opinion/experience matters more than most to me.

That's not a problem, but that doesn't change the fact or the results that I have posted along with picture that prove beyound a shadow of a dought the results.
Your choice

And I made it.

I have a ton of info and pictures, maybe I'll write a book will that make my info more "Valid"?

Thanks JB;

I haven't noticed either

Yes it would. Years of experience and testing and talking to bullet companies means alot to me.

It wouldn't be anymore valid than it is now, because you clearly have an agenda.

What is the title of this thread?

You are still full of BS. Do you have any thing of value to add? Any picture? Anything?

Lemme see if I can dig up some trumped up gut pics.....

You as wipe there is nothing trumped up in the photos that I have posted, you lack of intellegence knows no bounds

My azz. The zebra heart photo is so bogus its not even funny and for a variety of reasons.
And even then its still not very impressive.

Again you are full of bull [bleep].
Now you have started with the personal insults again since you are essentialy calling me a liar and a fraud

You truely are a real 100% bon-a-fide Dick Head

Not I who cast the first stone in regards to insults, but yea I am essentially calling you a liar and fraud....
Do you think people are so stupid as to not notice that you took that zebra heart photo from very close distance and that you splayed the lung off to the side to make the wound look larger?

They are as they fell. You are a real piece of Sh..t and that is apparent for all to see

I guess JJHack is wrong about TSX bullets as well? According to you they are worthless

http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/topic,121982.0.html

More from JJHack

http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/topic,121982.0.html




BWalker I don't expect you to get it, just want to save you the trouble of posting to let us know that you don't get it.

More from JJHack

http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php/topic,121982.0.html

Catch what? "...complaints with how they." With how they what? Well??



Or what about this?



Seriously? I am certainly no physicist but you better run that by me again:



I see how this works!


And then this:







Well, so you'll just discount it like that? And I suppose the same is true of the deer which TJT shot in the guts. That shot led to its demise - and he even recovered it. All good?



You've complained about lack of pictures more than once to posters. Yeah, well, what if we do? I do post some, but you don't like them since you choose what meets your approval for public consumption. I don't care since what you think means less and less with every post you make. But to use "still being manufactured" as an excuse. I wonder how many people are actually hunting with the latest and greatest rendition of their chosen bullet. Seriously, the old XFB pictured was a bullet which worked very well for me a number of times. In fact, judging from those I otherwise recovered, that bullet worked virtually like the best of what the TSXs do now. (And I suspect it would be okay to picture a North Fork or FailSafe even though they don't make them?)

Let's see what you did with this example:




The barely intelligible first quote above was a response to this. So what do you really mean?




What's amazing to me is how some people don't accept the fact that more than one person's experience can be valid. And that being right doesn't always meaning having to prove someone else wrong.

The facts appear to be that you choose to accept those pictures and details (and perhaps posters) whom you approve of. That's okay. Perhaps it's common. But attempting to prove others wrong to the world simply because you don't approve of what they offer from their experience is cheap. We can all decide those things for ourselves.

None of is a perfect human being nor a perfect hunter. And some of us don't write - or type- all that well. I don't see anyone bashing you too badly for the latter fault!

So, with a somewhat apologetic inclination for the preaching, but also a desire for vindication on behalf not only of others, but also myself - whom you have targeted in some of your recent posts, I hope that you will allow us to find some respect for you based on what you know and share, not because you are always trying to be the "rightest" one.

Your bullet is not produced any more.

180 grain of copper is the same weight and has the same momentum of as 180 grains of lead maybe you better go and brush up on your physics.
Weight is weight when both bullets weigh the same the momentum is the same at the same velocity


Of course sharing info is the intent, but some want to discredit the info with nothing of substance. Every thread that I post my results with TSX (not X bullets) you run out that photo of the old obsolete X bullet that hasn't been produced for YEARS as proof that TSX bullets fail. Post info that is current and I have no problem with that. How is the posting of a bullet that hasn't been produced for years relevant to a discussion of TSX bullets which are in production?