|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
How many pages are in the current US tax laws, (or as it should be known, the CPA, Book Keeper and Lawyer's Employment Act) within 1000 pages? (caveat: I got this number from a source I consider to be reliable but it is secondary)
"When we put [our enlisted men and women] in harm's way, it had better count for something. It can't be because some policy wonk back here has a brain fart of an idea of a strategy that isn't thought out." General Zinni on Iraq
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465 |
45,000
(Yep, pulled it right out of my ass. If I'm right it will be another sign that miracles do happen)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
Nope, but a very good guess.
"When we put [our enlisted men and women] in harm's way, it had better count for something. It can't be because some policy wonk back here has a brain fart of an idea of a strategy that isn't thought out." General Zinni on Iraq
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,896
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,896 |
Do not know why but 53,000 comes to mind. TM
Some mornings, it just does not feel worth it to chew through the straps!~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,174 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,174 Likes: 4 |
The only true cost of having a dog is its death.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 48,411
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 48,411 |
IIFID--don't have a clue but the number would depend on how you count. Do you just mean the tax code itself, or do you include the IRS regulations, Revenue rulings, Tax Court opinions, Private Letter rulings, etc etc. It's an absurdly large number however you count. And the founders went to war over a two penny tax on their freaking tea!
Proudly representing oil companies, defense contractors, and firearms manufacturers since 1980. Because merchants of death need lawyers, too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
Steve:
I think (but it wasn't specified) that this number includes the regs, rulings, etc since they are necessary for anyone to attempt to interpret the tax code. Which is more art than science since the IRS is simply trying to gather as much revenue as they can, and their attorneys are not as highly paid and rarely as smart as the ones hired by those looking for ways to reduce the load. One ruling that used to gripe my butt was, which has probably been changed by now with the new "home" ownership breaks. But if you sold your home and made a profit, you owed tax, but if you sold it and lost money you couldn't deduct it.
"When we put [our enlisted men and women] in harm's way, it had better count for something. It can't be because some policy wonk back here has a brain fart of an idea of a strategy that isn't thought out." General Zinni on Iraq
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,428
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,428 |
123,649 ..............Boots
Holding onto anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other the person to die ......
"When I stand before God at the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and could say, "I used everything you gave me."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
I'm going to award the free lunch, cheap beer and better whisky along with the dancing girls he has to provide if he ever gets to Texas to Travelingman. The total I had was 55,000 !!!! Ridiculous.
Flat tax anyone? Can you imagine how many billions of dollars and labor hours are spent each year complying with our tax code?
"When we put [our enlisted men and women] in harm's way, it had better count for something. It can't be because some policy wonk back here has a brain fart of an idea of a strategy that isn't thought out." General Zinni on Iraq
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,896
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,896 |
Blush! I am so honored. There are so many I need to thank!
Now where did I leave that pickup truck full of thank you notes. Bet you guys are going to be glad I used the new "reduced paperwork" set of thank you notes, before I am through! TM
Some mornings, it just does not feel worth it to chew through the straps!~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,110
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,110 |
Flat tax!! I thought you wanted the Government to create jobs instead of eliminating them. miles
Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,278
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,278 |
Taxation Is Theft!
(sorry...couldn't resist)
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist." --Lysander Spooner, 1867
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465 |
Can I at least join in for a beer for getting a close second?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 311
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 311 |
Flat tax? Is that not where every citizen with the franchise pays the same amount? Or are we all not really equal under the law?
Cheers from Darkest California,
Ross
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,678
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,678 |
Being a CPA myself, at least by education, I say bring on the flat tax. Certainly would put a lot of people, deservedly so, out of work. My fear is that those lawyers now with "real jobs" would have to run for elected office to feed their families and that would be retro for certain. Problem with flat tax is that the period allowed for the flat tax to become effective would be so long that most of us would not live to see the benefits on thousand upon thousans of unemployed attorneys, cpa's and govt employees! My vote is still FOR the flat tax.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
muygrande1:
True, it would be extremely difficult at first, but after all, we now have the AMT. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" /> There would have to be a long lead time to fully convert. However, I'd suggest something on the order of 10 years where would we have a dual tax system, but after, say, 3 years (allowing for major projects currently on in the planning/drawing board stage to be started) you could not elect any new depreciation schedules, benefits, etc. under the present system. Each taxpayer would elect to pay under the flat tax with no deductions, starting at the first dollar earned or the current system, with built in phase out periods. You would have to elect one or the other and, if you used the current system, figure the flat tax, as soon as the flat tax due became less than the old system or after the 10 year changeover period, you would be converted to a flat taxpayer. Once a taxpayer elected to use the flat tax or got converted by owing less, that would be that. The obviously sticky part is the long term depreciation schedules currently in place on buildings and corporate taxes. There would be some huge glitches but the savings in tax prep time alone would likely offset them. With a little bit of luck, and the Congress staying out of it (yeah right, wonder how we got to 55K pages now <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />), the flat tax code, once fully implemented, would take less than a page of regulations. I don't even have a problem with a dual level unflat tax, just keep it in percentages of all income and go from there. No deductions, no IRAs, no Roths, no 401Ks, no deductions for the corporation paying your medical insurance, etc. If it is renumeration or profit of any kind, you pay tax on it. This is a gross simplification, but it would work, if the Congress could stay out of it, once it got rolling. Which is extremely unlikely. So.......National sales tax anyone? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,092 |
Spike:
You can have the free beer, bring more girls... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
"When we put [our enlisted men and women] in harm's way, it had better count for something. It can't be because some policy wonk back here has a brain fart of an idea of a strategy that isn't thought out." General Zinni on Iraq
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,465 |
Laughing here.
Sister-in-law will be in tow. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,805 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,805 Likes: 2 |
[quote]Flat tax anyone? Can you imagine how many billions of dollars and labor hours are spent each year complying with our tax code? [quote]
Just for fun . . . . .
The Flat tax is on income, right?
So define income . . . . . . .
Oops, we are at 55,000 pages again.
As an example, if RickBin spent $10,000 to make 2,000 Swirly Rifle Stocks and sold the stocks for ten dollars each ($20,000), how much did I make?
Most would say $20,000 (gross income) minus $10,000 (cost of production) equals $10,000 (net income). The $10,000 net income is Flat taxable.
That's fine with me, but things get complicated quickly. If RickBin spent $15,000 researching a better way to apply the paint to stocks, and he creates a dramatic improvement in quality, does he get to deduct the $15,000? If yes, then he has not made any moey yet ($10,000 minus $15,000 = -$5,000).
But, under normal accounting procedures, we would charge that $15,000 equally to 15,000 rifle stocks (or $1 per stock). Thus, Rick deducts $2,000 from his $10,000 net income and pays tax on $8,000. He still gets to keep $13,000 in research costs to be allocated in future years
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!! . . . . . . . .
They Scream! . . . . . . .
They all go running from the building . . . . . .. . .
The point here is that Income Accounting is very difficult. Many of the concepts that you see in the tax code are ACCOUNTING concepts. The IRS Simply applies these concepts to income taxation.
Many of these accounting principles have been established for 100's of years. The reason that 300 year old principles still survive is that such principles make sense.
Secondly, as long as we have a Congress that make social policy through the tax code, it will be complicated. For example, most of us still want employer provided health incurance to be tax free. Of course, we want the benefits paid by the health insurer to be tax free. Those two provisions alone get about 500 pages of the tax code.
I say, bring on the flat tax! I will make a killing for the next 20 years as we work out the details . . . . . . .
Of course, it will stink for everyone else . . . . . .
The truth is that raising the standard deduction will get rid of most of the taxpayer nightmares much more easily. This is simply because under current conditions, very few Americans have enough deductions to itmeize.
THIS IS GOOD!
It means that the gov't is reducing the filing and record keeping burdens on most Americans and giving them MORE TAX BENEFITS than they are otherwise entitled to.
Just my 2 cents . . . . . .
BMT
|
|
|
|
501 members (1beaver_shooter, 1Longbow, 1badf350, 219 Wasp, 22250rem, 160user, 49 invisible),
2,363
guests, and
1,260
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,153
Posts18,502,887
Members73,993
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|