|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,252 Likes: 27
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,252 Likes: 27 |
The last 4-16x44 LOW Weaver I found used about a year ago had plain fine crosshairs, no duplex. I don't recall if it was $45 or $60 but I bought it and gave it to a buddy who helps out w/local kids doing the rimfire matches. I'm sure I could've found something to put it on for myself but I figured that the kids needed it more than I would. Those are $200-$350 on ebay. Like everyone has said, here, they are damn good scopes. Work great on a rimfire, for sure. Good on you for giving that one a good home.
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,258 Likes: 25
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,258 Likes: 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,252 Likes: 27
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,252 Likes: 27 |
Nikons were much better, when they had a warranty if something went wrong. The funny thing about that, though, is that rarely happened. They were/are pretty utilitarian with good lines. At least the older ones were more svelte than the newer ones. Good robust scopes with decent glass for the money. Some tracked better than others as well.
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,258 Likes: 25
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,258 Likes: 25 |
Yeah there’s a diff between the pro staff and buckmasters I think they were priced around the same
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,056 Likes: 8
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,056 Likes: 8 |
The Weaver Classic V scopes were very good. The only version that was a bit herky was the 2-10×38. Herky? More like downright awful, like looking through the tube off a roll of paper towels. I much preferred the 3-9 over the 2-10x38. The 2-10 was very poor on 2 power and not much better the rest of the way up. The 3-9 was good and so was the 1-3. The 2-7 was ok. The v16 4-16 was always good. Bb
|
|
|
|
|
538 members (1OntarioJim, 2500HD, 1badf350, 222ND, 257Bob, 24HourCampFireGuy50, 56 invisible),
2,463
guests, and
1,245
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,911
Posts18,518,659
Members74,020
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
