I like the Coens' take on things, most of the time. And I don't mind "remakes" if they're well done. I was prepared to loath the remake of "3:10 to Yuma', but it was worth watching if you just regard it as a western and not as some sort of social commentary (which it wasn't).
The Coens' treatment of "No Country for Old Men" was refreshingly close to the book until they apparently decided to cut a key element close to the end. The overall effect was authentic (probably thanks to Tommy Lee Jones and his knowledge of westerners and west Texas). Haven't seen "The Road", so I don't know how they fared on that one...
Ben
Some days it takes most of the day for me to do practically nothing...
Man this is like making a remake of "Dirty Harry", some movies should be left alone, the originals are still good. I would consider giving Bridges a chance, but not if it means having to watch (big mouth, small brain) Matt Damon.
Clint Eastwood will always be Dirty Harry & Wayne will always be Cogburn.
there just isn't any way possible to remake that film. Which prompted me to have a few of those colts with the fancy grips and a period winchester takedown in 38.55
While its true there will never be another John Wayne the same book with a different screen play could stand on its own. Surely Bridges is smart enough to not infuse his roll with the Duke's mannerisms.
I have seen many people play Doc Holliday yet none beat Val Kilmer's take on the man.
If ya'll read the story, they aren't remaking the John Wayne film. They are making a new True Grit film based more closely on the novel, which is fantastic and ya'll should read.
You can't remake a John Wayne movie, but you can make a new movie with the same basic story and tell it in a new way. And that's what the Cohen Brothers are going to do. And honestly, no one can do it better than them. And if any of you have read the book, Jeff Bridges is probably the best actor on earth to play that role. Yes, even better than John Wayne.
And Matt Damon is appropriate for the role of LaBeouf, considering the character is a gigantic douchebag. Glenn Campbell was appropriate in the 1960's, Matt Damon is appropriate now.
It will be a damn fine film, and the people who will boycott it without knowing jack about it are the same idiots who refused to watch Top Shot based on seeing 10 minutes of the pilot.
Brian.
"You set your own goals for success, and when you succeed it don't necessarily mean that you're going to be a big star or make a lot of money or anything. You'll feel it in your heart whether you've succeeded or not." - Roy Buchanan
Thinking there are enough idiots on here that would boycott puzzy after one bad relationship or because 'none' could compete with the one piece they got in 1973.
It will awfully hard to produce a film as good as the original True Grit.
I would agree, but it sounds like its going to be a substantially different film. I'm betting they have moved away from the more "comic" elements of the original and gone for a harder, edgier version in keeping with the book...
In many ways its a shame they are calling it "True Grit" as it will always be under the shadow of the original; had they changed the name it may have had a better chance to be judged on its own merits...