|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 904
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 904 |
I am looking to top off my new 7 RM. Let's here pros/cons and compare the scopes below. Best glass, dependability, reliability, holds zero, ergonomics, etc.
Leupold VX3 3.5-10x40 Minox ZA5 2-10x40 Swaro z3 3-10x42
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 270
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 270 |
Leupold makes good scopes mechanically but are lacking in their glass. Minox has GREAT glass but mechanically are not yet proven being new to the market. Swaros are great but you pay for it. Minox weighs less than the other two and is usually shorter with greater eye relief. Minox also has the best warranty. You fall down a mountain and land on the scope they replace it. Overall the Minox is the best buy. I would also strongly consider Trijicon Accupoints, Zeiss Conquest and Bushnell Elite 4200s. The Elite 4200s are being renamed and can be found dirt cheap right now. Great scopes with Rainguard but CS sucks. The Trijicons are the best scopes for hunting and low light due to the reticle, but don't have the magnification range of the ZA 5. The Conquest has etched reticles and great glass. I list the scopes I own in this order for hunting large game:
Trijicon Accupoint Minox ZA 5 Elite 4200 Zeiss Conquest
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742 |
Leupold makes good scopes mechanically but are lacking in their glass. there are some that wouldnt agree with that
"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered." ― George Orwell, 1984
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,102
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,102 |
Swarovski Z3 is top shelf quality, but if you only got $300.00 to spend, Leupold will kill deer also. Your question is like comparing a Berretta shotgun vs Mossberg IMO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668 |
Ouch! Leupold ONLY rates equal to a Mossberg???
NRA Patron Member.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,352 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,352 Likes: 1 |
I am looking to top off my new 7 RM. Let's here pros/cons and compare the scopes below. Best glass, dependability, reliability, holds zero, ergonomics, etc.
Leupold VX3 3.5-10x40 Minox ZA5 2-10x40 Swaro z3 3-10x42 Herschel34, I tried the Minox 2-10 and it has great glass but flare at 8-10 and somewhat critical eye positioning. I sent it back and got the Minox 3-9 the glass is very very good, it tracks real good, its light, eye positioning is not critical in my opinion, the euro style focus could be a little stiffer and the reticule is thin like on a standard Leupold. I have this scope on a Kimber Montana in 308 and I had to go with Talley LW mediums because the 42 inch objective hits the shank of the barrel in lows. It is a few ounces lighter than my Conquest scopes. It has held zero just fine over the last 5 months. Of the 11 scopes that I own I like the Conquest 2.5 x 8 the best, this one second best at this time. I do like the darker reticule in the Conquest but I think the 3x9 Conquest is just too big for what it is. I have never owned a swaro scope but of the Leupolds I own I have only had one give me a problem and I think it was the weird Thompson Center rings I purchased (a mistake) and in tightening them I was mashing the scope tube. John Barness article regards "farmer tight" is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881 |
I'd take the Leupold and skip the others. First of all, when properly compared, Leupold matches almost everybody in their price range when it comes to both low light and resoloution. Of the very few that beat it, they only do so by the smallest margins. Ask Barsness about what he found in his testing. I suspect that Leupold sometimes gets low marks in this area because there are still lots of people who don't realize that it is possible to focus not just the scope's reticle, but it's image as well. Second, their reputation for being tough and reliable is exceeded by none as far as I can tell. They have a very extensive reasearch and testing program just for this, unlike most other makers. They have a couple of features that I really like. One is their insistance of using large eye boxes in their designs. That makes it easier to acquire the scope's image when in a hurry. The other is their super tough coatings which will help maintain their fine optical properties over the years. E
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 904
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 904 |
Ouch! Leupold ONLY rates equal to a Mossberg??? My exact sentiment. A VX-3 = Mossberg? Not sure what to make of that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742 |
I'd take the Leupold and skip the others. First of all, when properly compared, Leupold matches almost everybody in their price range when it comes to both low light and resoloution. Of the very few that beat it, they only do so by the smallest margins. Ask Barsness about what he found in his testing. I suspect that Leupold sometimes gets low marks in this area because there are still lots of people who don't realize that it is possible to focus not just the scope's reticle, but it's image as well. Second, their reputation for being tough and reliable is exceeded by none as far as I can tell. They have a very extensive reasearch and testing program just for this, unlike most other makers. They have a couple of features that I really like. One is their insistance of using large eye boxes in their designs. That makes it easier to acquire the scope's image when in a hurry. The other is their super tough coatings which will help maintain their fine optical properties over the years. E DO YOU CUT AND PASTE THIS DAILY? also Leupold has excellent CS but as many have noted it was because it had to be used so whats going on with their R&D
Last edited by SAKO75; 01/10/11.
"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered." ― George Orwell, 1984
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,918 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,918 Likes: 14 |
There are Leupold haters around here, along with Leupold lovers.
ABL syndrome vs. NBL syndrome.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,918 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,918 Likes: 14 |
also Leupold has excellent CS but as many have noted it was because it had to be used so whats going on with their R&D I'd ask about QC, more than R&D.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742 |
he mentioned research & testing
"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered." ― George Orwell, 1984
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
I was going to say yesterday that the 3-9 Conquest belngs on that list, but I'm guessing the OP is trying for light weight here based on the three choices. But i'd STILL put that particular Conquest on the list. The 3-9x40 Conquest is a kickass scope, period, and with the price factored in is simply awesome value.
Of the three, I would approach the Minox with a bit of a hairy eyeball due to it's newness. I have a 3-10x42 Swaro AV (which are essentially the same as the Z3, and are out there for ~$800 right now!) and it's been great on my light .325. I'd buy another if I could.
Have not owned a Leup 3.5-10 but I've had several 2.5-8's and looked through plenty of 3.5-10's. Based on my experiences with Leup and the above, I'd call it a very good scope and would be happy to own one. When the rubber met the road though, my last two scopes have been 3-9 Conquests. Looong constant eye relief (you Leup guys don't know what you are missing!), excellent glass, very very good in low light, etched (dark) reticle, and every one of the half-dozen Conquests I've had, tracks and returns to zero very very well.
Just IMHO.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,205
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,205 |
I currently own all three of the scopes your mentioning along with the Conquest, I really don't think you can go wrong with any of them. I can tell you that the Minox is the most difficult to sell if you ever want to, as I just witnessed last week in the classifieds here. If I had to choose one, I would probably take the Conquest.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
I'd take the Leupold and skip the others. First of all, when properly compared....... E New code word for focused ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,701 Likes: 47
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,701 Likes: 47 |
I am looking to top off my new 7 RM. Let's here pros/cons and compare the scopes below. Best glass, dependability, reliability, holds zero, ergonomics, etc.
Leupold VX3 3.5-10x40 Minox ZA5 2-10x40 Swaro z3 3-10x42 I can solve your problem as have one of these for sale, excellent shape and much better scope than the others...$750.00
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1 |
Minox ain't been around long in the scope department so we shall see.
That said, I'd run a the Leupold or Minox before I would another Z3 Swaro.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662 |
Minox ain't been around long in the scope department so we shall see.
That said, I'd run a the Leupold or Minox before I would another Z3 Swaro. Steelhead I was ready to push the button on buying a Z3 so can you fill me in on what problems you had with them? I was switching to Swarovski because the Z3's I checked out were lighter yet just as bright as my Zeiss... Thanks
Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662 |
Of the two Leupold (which I have several and like so dont put me in the Leupold hater group) or Minox; the deals on Minox's that Doug has been running at Cameraland are very tempting.
Last edited by old_willys; 01/10/11.
Ted
|
|
|
|
586 members (12344mag, 222Sako, 257 mag, 1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 257Bob, 72 invisible),
2,194
guests, and
1,146
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,567
Posts18,531,811
Members74,039
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|