Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Time for US to Support Her!

Bachmann was clearly confused on the slavery issue, the follow up explanation was merely spin so that she wouldn't look so ignernt. Didn't fool anybody. She's not somebody I would want in charge of the PTA, as the education of our children is far too important to be entrusted to the likes of her.

Somebody above was wrong, if you can imagine that somebody on the internet could be wrong. McCain's fatal mistake was choosing Palin as his running mate. For many Americans, her stupidity killed the ticket. I could have voted for McCain, but when his choice was announced, I lost all faith in his judgement.

Good points and I agree with you. Both ladies are brain dead and should not be incharge of anything other than the PTA.

Until the right figures out who they are, they're going to have trouble winning no matter who they put up.



You have the one segment of the right who thinks US world domination trumps every other issue. You have another segment who views moral issues above all else. Then you have some who want as little government as possible in every aspect.



Those groups don't mesh very well as we've seen right here on a conservative dominated board.

Credibility was never a deep concern of mine. So far as the "Micheles" remark, you need to work on your sense of humor.

As far as her tenure with IRS, I rather imagine that's a lot like trying gay once then claiming your not. The problem there isn't the length of career, it's the mindset that allows one to enter the field to start with. It reeks of Big Government mentality. Don't trust Bachmann and never will. Fluff, no substance, sort of like Barry....

That�s the theory that keeps political consultants employed, but it�s far from reality. Many people in the center just don�t buy the BS from left or right wingers. An enthusiastic left or right base turns the center off. To win the center we need a candidate who can convince them they�ll have more money in their pocket if he�s elected. Reagan knew that and used it against Carter to good effect, and kept his job for a second term because the economy was improving; remember stay the course? Bush 41 rode that same wave into office.



McCain lost because he was a dull old fart running on the war. When the economy went south McCain said he didn�t know much about it and made similarly stupid statements. Then he did the ultimate dumb thing of suspending his campaign to go to Washington to deal with TARP, only to be ignored. The economy and war fatigue is what won Obama the election, not some ideological change in the nation from right to center to well left of center, although the liberals tried to make that claim.

Now the same idiots who gave us McCain are at play again. That�s my real peeve. Why should the same bunch always have first crack at narrowing down the candidates? To fix Washington the primary process needs to be fixed or we�ll just keep getting the same bunch of horse sh*t candidates for president.

barkoff is right, the middle is more conservative than the republican party at this time.

Neither lost because they were near the center politically, they lost because they were poor candidates from the get go. Dole was a throw-away against Clinton for his second term; back when spending was under control and the economy was doing great. Dole was 73, the oldest first-time presidential nominee even beating Ronald Reagan. McCain ran on the Iraq war and was poorly prepared to run on the economy and even said he didn�t know much about it.

If Republicans run some rightwingnut this time they�ll not only lose the center they�ll lose moderate Republicans and give Obama a landslide victory that he�ll falsely claim is a mandate for more socialist laws.

Any candidate who gets up in front of the people and tells them exactly how dire the situation is and what it will take to truly fix it will be lucky to get 2% of the vote.

It's gonna take more than goring the ox,...he's gonna have to be nuked.

Candidates will talk about a little bit of reform here and there,...but they're not going to explain what 14 trillion dollars of debt and 75 trillion dollars in entitlements over the next 20 years really means.

Many owned slaves so how commited were they?
Bachman mis-spoke, no way! If she puts O'Donnell on her ticket we all will forget who Sarah was! Bachamn... the new Sarah, with only 1/2 the brains. Is that possible?

Good points and I agree with you. Both ladies are brain dead and should not be incharge of anything other than the PTA.

Bachmann was clearly confused on the slavery issue, the follow up explanation was merely spin so that she wouldn't look so ignernt. Didn't fool anybody. She's not somebody I would want in charge of the PTA, as the education of our children is far too important to be entrusted to the likes of her.

Somebody above was wrong, if you can imagine that somebody on the internet could be wrong. McCain's fatal mistake was choosing Palin as his running mate. For many Americans, her stupidity killed the ticket. I could have voted for McCain, but when his choice was announced, I lost all faith in his judgement.

You haven't? Let me help you out--- Bachmann and Palin. Of course, Palin's approval rating would have fallen if she wasn't a quitter. Anybody seen a poll on whether or not Alaskans think she made the right decision? I understand they're glad to be rid of her.

I chit you not, if it's another pawlenty, bachman, McDole, huckabutt, romney, or any of these other useless pukes the GOP has had stuck in their throats and unable to dislodge for the last 20 years, I swear to God above, I'll vote for Obama.
I'll do it!

There's a bulls eye, right there.
That eyeball of yours sees crystal clear.... and right to the heart of this matter.

Now the same idiots who gave us McCain are at play again. That�s my real peeve. Why should the same bunch always have first crack at narrowing down the candidates? To fix Washington the primary process needs to be fixed or we�ll just keep getting the same bunch of horse sh*t candidates for president.

I don't think Bachman has the gumption let alone guts to take on the establishment repubs. They need kicked in the nuts, HARD and repeatedly. Palin has proven not only willing but eager and her success in that arena still resounds loud and clear to more than a few.
Establishment Repubs, neocons, war mongers, fed reserve lovers, etc etc - everything that is wrong on the right - fears Palin just as much if not more than the liberal left. I don't see that with Bachman.

To be honest I like Bachman better than any of the rest of the field of retards and rejects and retreads, but the margin is small.

Then there's this

I've said it since high school and still believe it true. the American people only think they choose their president. Fact is they choose one name from the two chosen for them. That's not a choice and it's not we the people running the government, it's being led along on a rope like a tame milking cow choosing which milker gets to grab and yank your tits for the next 4 years.

.....


Screw BAchman. And the horse she rode in on. And all the rest of these GD people Team R seem so endeared by. I chit you not, if it's another pawlenty, bachman, McDole, huckabutt, romney, or any of these other useless pukes the GOP has had stuck in their throats and unable to dislodge for the last 20 years, I swear to God above, I'll vote for Obama.
I'll do it!