24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Sheeeit... Around the lug or forearm?

GB1

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
I'm referring to sanding out the barrel channel. Don't touch the action area unless you plan on bedding it wink

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
I'll see if mag primers make a diff before I whittle on this piece of plastic wink

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
I thought you were getting a 243AI barrel?

PS, don't worry about the barrel coming clean. I would get some Wipeout and a Boresnake, and call it good.


Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Drew I ended up sending the AI barrel back... wasn't what I was looking for and I ended up just going with a vanilla 243.

I went and shot some milk jugs at 435 to see if they'd stabilize that far. Both the Retumbo and H4350 loads did just fine... I'm done worrying about 100 yard groups. It's not a custom barrel and I'm not a good enough shooter to blame anything on powders, barrels, or bullets.

Now, to chrony whichever I go with, and move on out. My dope from QL got me in the ballpark to shoot out to 435, but I'm gonna want to know what I'm running to air it out I think.

Last edited by TannerGun; 01/19/12.
IC B2

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,074
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,074
Originally Posted by rockchuck828
Tanner just a little advise. Retumbo is not 243 powder even with the heavies.
I have a 6mm-284 that has quite a bit more case cap. than a 243 and it is still way too slow of a burn rate.
RL22 is about as slow of a burn rate that is realistic, my favorite in the 243 with 95-105gr bullets is IMR4831.
Right now on this forum many are gacking allover themselves that RL17 will do anything...it is a much better choice than Retumbo.
VVN160,RL19,H4831, hell even JB's TAC that he claim's you will never need to clean for the life of the barrel is a better choice than Retumbo......you've been gettin bad advice


Retumbo is the powder of choice for the 243 Win in my little world. But then I would hardly be inclined to push the silly lil 243 Win as much of a gun. laugh laugh



Buy an MTM drop tube if you want that 243 Win to run with 105s. wink


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Haha, I've been having to pour my charges in reaaalllly slow with Retumbo. Time for drop tube indeed.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,074
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,074
Originally Posted by TannerGun
Haha, I've been having to pour my charges in reaaalllly slow with Retumbo. Time for drop tube indeed.


grin grin


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,636
N
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,636
Swirling technique..
Tilt your funnel just a bit..
Pour the powder directly into the side of the funnel up high..
You should get a swirling of the power like water going down the drain..
If you don't get the swirling then you aren't doing it right..
Some say it works better than a drop tube, but I don't know as I have never used a drop tube..


It's a great life if you don't weaken..
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
Since part of this thread was cleaning, anyone used the outers electrolysis system to decopper a barrel?


"We are building a dictatorship of relativism which recoqnizes nothing as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of ones own self ego and desires."Cardinal Rathzinger
IC B3

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,628
E
efw Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,628
TG-

Thanks for the inspiration here!

I've got a commercial mauser action, beautifully figured Boyd's JRS stock that Karnis has just reshaped for me, and I'm hoping to put an 8- or 9"-twist 24" Douglas tube on it chambered to 6mm Rem. I've got a couple of those Burris FFIIs lying around and am going to send one in for the mods.

Thanks again; I'm excited to hear about your results here!

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
efw,

the Burris, while sporting some nice glass (at least in my small experience), could definetely beef up their turrets a bit. I haven't used it on the 243 yet cuz I set up the Bushnell on it, but you just have to really pay attention to what you're dialing in because the clicks are a bit mushy. That being said, for my intended purposes and the guy just looking to have some fun, I'm sure it'll turn out to be a great scope.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,628
E
efw Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,628
That is ironic, since one of my FFIIs was traded here on the 'fire for that 10x 3200 w/ turrets you're talking up.

Oh well... live and learn smile !

Good luck!

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Glass-wise, I definitely think the Burris is a better scope! The turrets just lack a bit.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,200
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,200
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rockchuck828
Tanner just a little advise. Retumbo is not 243 powder even with the heavies.
I have a 6mm-284 that has quite a bit more case cap. than a 243 and it is still way too slow of a burn rate.
RL22 is about as slow of a burn rate that is realistic, my favorite in the 243 with 95-105gr bullets is IMR4831.
Right now on this forum many are gacking allover themselves that RL17 will do anything...it is a much better choice than Retumbo.
VVN160,RL19,H4831, hell even JB's TAC that he claim's you will never need to clean for the life of the barrel is a better choice than Retumbo......you've been gettin bad advice


Retumbo is the powder of choice for the 243 Win in my little world. But then I would hardly be inclined to push the silly lil 243 Win as much of a gun. laugh laugh



Buy an MTM drop tube if you want that 243 Win to run with 105s. wink


John, that is great you and a few others have got Retumbo to work in a 243, I have tried it in 243 6mmAI and 6-284 and always found a better powder for 95-115gr bullets. Every barrel is different and good luck with it if it works for you....

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Alright guys... I got to shoot er at a little longer range today, went out to 530 and let er rip. But... I'm perplexed.

Checked my zero before I backed up, exactly 3 inches at 100, dead center. Backed up, and missed about 4 times. I went back up to my target, and I'd been shooting over it (I expected to be a little off, my velocity input in Shooter was just a ballpark guess.) So, I went back out, dialed my scope back down, and started nailing the gong.

Here is the weird part... I only needed 3.5 MOA of up to hit at 530 yards. WTF. That would mean my MV would be close to 3300 FPS I believe. Granted, I was shooting slightly downhill, but I still dont' think that would make this much of a difference. Shooter was telling me to dial a bunch more ele than I ended up needing.

Here's the info for the load/atmosphere:
105 AMAX- 49 gr Retumbo, CCI 250. COAL of 2.8

7300 feet ASL, 29.73inHg, 39 degrees, 75 percent humidity.

Somebody has gotta have an idea of WTF this is about.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
"zero...exactly 3 inches at 100"

Did you account for your zero range when you input your data into Shooter?

That would probably explain the discrepancy...

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
My zero is entered as 3 inches high in Shooter.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
How much elevation was Shooter telling you to dial?

You need to chrony your load wink

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Tanner Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,273
Man I know.. I'm gonna try to borrow a clock tomorrow. I think when I get my real velocities it'll shape up... But shooter shows 9+ MOA at 530, when I change the zero height to 0".

Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

563 members (02bfishn, 160user, 10gaugeman, 16gage, 1Longbow, 1234, 56 invisible), 2,501 guests, and 1,285 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,431
Posts18,470,796
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.111s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8990 MB (Peak: 1.0360 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 17:49:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS