|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753 |
Looking for an inexpensive spotter strictly for range use, and was looking at this one. Mini Mak 70 Anyone with any experience here?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333 |
Celestron makes good scopes at a good price. The Mini Mak, however, doesn't have a band that allows you to rotate the scope after it's mounted and that tripod it comes with is a bit flimsy. If you're just going to sit it on a bench, it will probably work fine - just don't expect much adjustment out of it as far as being able to position it for easy viewing. (I like to have my scope where all I have to do is turn my head just a tad to look through it after shooting).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753 |
That shouldn't be a problem, it will be more for someone other than the shooter to call out impacts and adjustments. I seldom go shooting alone, and if so, I'll just make do on those occasions.
I kinda figured another tri-pod for it would be in order, so that's no biggie.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333 |
Go for it, then. I've seen some Mak style scopes on the line at Camp Perry a time or two, so they must work OK.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753 |
One other question I had was about how far do you think a scope like this would be effective, 3-400 yards? We're talking 6 and 7mm bullet holes.
Thanks for the input. I'm leaning pretty heavy towards one of these.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333 |
For a $100 spotter, you'd be lucky to see any size bullet holes past about 200 yards, depending on conditions. I don't know anyone in my realm of competition (Service Rifle) that can see holes past 300, even with the high-dollar scopes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 753 |
Ok, thanks. As you can see, my experience with spotters is basically non-existent.
Maybe using the Shoot-N-See targets would help extend the range some. Either way, it sounds pretty handy for setting my 200 yard zero.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 127
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 127 |
I have a Meade ETX 90 Mak and it works great for spotting bullet holes. I do have Nikon 50ED and 60ED as well. I looked on Amazon and here are some reviews on there. Looks like sample variations just like any scope. http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-522..._cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1
Regards,Steve
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,333 |
Actually, you can buy a lifetime supply of Shoot-N-C targets for what a top-quality spotting scope will cost.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 780
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 780 |
I have the C90 Mak SKU #52268 D 90mm (3.54") F 1250mm and find it great just like SteveWM does with his Meade. You are much better off spending the few extra bucks for a 90 over the 70mm models. I've also added a star diagnonal to handle 2" eyepieces for night sky use. The provided 1.25" erecting image diagonal is not suitable for astronomy.
-=[Bob]=-
|
|
|
|
631 members (10gaugemag, 1936M71, 10Glocks, 12344mag, 19rabbit52, 163bc, 55 invisible),
2,370
guests, and
1,214
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,622
Posts18,511,985
Members74,008
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|