Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire COPS GUN DOWN MAN FOR LEGALLY CARRYING FIREARM

We have some gadgets the dicks use. I'm not worthy. grin

Speaking of case selective, why didn't you quote all of villareal's account?

It'll be unfortunate for him if he's railroaded, sure; but imagine what's going to happen in this country if he's acquitted.

It'll be OJ backwards, except that there'll be no comparison--none at all.

Why would I? To answer - for the same reason i did not repost the entire article. I was only interested in what they said they actually saw, not their opinion or their speculation.

Then you should have posted the next two sentences in his account.

================

As compared to your flailing about with these silly "what ifs" of yours.

Lets see, was it this one:
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/may/13/officer-involved-erik-scott-shooting-indicted-gun-/

oh no no, thats the story of the murdering cop providing firearms to known felons. Somehow that seems much more dangerous than a hoilstered weapon. Should he have been shot on sight? Do you think swat just forgot to show up at that arrest?


OK, maybe it was this: Will Nelson said he heard an officer yelling at someone to get down. (Note -I guess Will is lucky he didn't get shot sine it would seem by this account he also failed to follow orders) When he looked over, all he saw was Scott�s hand, which was holding something brown and was extended in front of him, he said.

He said he heard a gunshot and the object, which he recognized as a holster, dropped out of Scott�s hand.

Scott didn�t look like he was handing the holster to the officer � it was more like he was displaying it to them � but he wasn�t holding it as if he was going to shoot it, Nelson said.

Scott didn�t seem to be a threat, but he also didn�t comply with the officer�s orders, Nelson said.

He said he believes it would have been a better situation had the officers confronted Scott in the parking lot rather than near the store entrance, where there were more people around.

Wait, I'll find it, hang on... this one?

Costco customer John Cooper said he didn�t see police when he first left the store but later saw an officer with a firearm in his hands.

Then he noticed Scott facing the officer.

�He was not in a defensive manner,� Cooper said. �He was just standing there, almost in a relaxed position initially.�

He said that he felt guilty he didn�t attempt to render aid to Scott after he had been shot. An Army colonel with 27 years of experience, he said he felt someone should have checked on the man before paramedics arrived.



This one! got it:
When asked during a question from an interested party, Villareale said it didn't look like Scott was going to hand the gun to the police, but he also didn't point the gun at the officer.

How long have you been out of the joint,bitter boy?

So very witty. I had no idea you were terribly clever. And do mean terribly.

Now that it is established you disregard that which suites you, lets follow up with some rather inane gibberish; see if you can recognize it and determine whom it suits best:


Plodding through life basing opinions on preconceived assumptions and a total disregard for the facts must be a comfortable place to mwallow for the lazy and woefully ignorant. Prime example of the "ignorance is bliss" theory.

You obviously didn't read the eyewitness accounts.

It's actually the hawkeye rule. Your ignoring of facts before spouting your repetitive moans and whines about LE have always been suspect. And,for good reason. A pre-disposed mindset coupled with a total disregard for facts is a bed you made. Don't blame others for you being forced to sleep in it.


I know you'll need some help. Here's a hint -not hawkeye.

Nope. It would have been the next two sentences in his statement like I said before, but they didn't fit your agenda.

I�m not certain how my not reprinting what has already been provided somehow validates you. I did not repeat any of the information of the article to assert that it was the entirety of the content. In fact, just the opposite. I reprinted to assert that the entirety of the content had not been presented. Since the guy was likely killed un-necessarily, I�ll willingly accept that as my agenda. Thanks for the elevated status.

How much back-up time do you have hanging over your head,junior?

RISJR, As you seem to be keenly focused on jail time and backing up, I'll defer to your no doubt considerable expertise in the matter. In the event you just felt the need to attempt some form of petty insult to further yourself in the conversation, please attempt intelligible content.

You might be asking for something Bob's not capable of.

Bottom line is you ignored facts that didn't fit your agenda. Your mind was made up as soon as you read the thread title and nothing will change it.

Stupid people make me tired. Especially when they try to sound smart.

Grin.

I don't think that is anything you two would be accused of pile.

Is that better if i approach you on your level?


grin grin.

Okay, I had to look that up.


1pile
noun \ˈpī(-ə)l\
Definition of PILE
1: a long slender column usually of timber, steel, or reinforced concrete driven into the ground to carry a vertical load
2: a wedge-shaped heraldic charge usually placed vertically with the broad end up
3 a: a target-shooting arrowhead without cutting edges b[Latin pilum]: an ancient Roman foot soldier's heavy javelin


Origin of PILE

Middle English, dart, quill, pole driven into the ground, from Old English pīl, from Latin pilum javelin
First Known Use: 12th century
_______________________________________

WTF are you talking about?

That's "Pyle" Dick.

Gunner