Also back to the original question:
I came across an inexpensive lightweight spotter from Alpen (the Calif. remnant of Bausch & Lomb). Well made, waterproof, decent optics (Hakko glass I believe). Also had good eye relief, which can be a problem with some cheap spotters. I have an older version of their 18-36x60. They have a few models at your price limit. Just another option to consider. Mine works well, and has been tested on some rough hunts.
When I bought mine in Idaho, I spent about an hour in a store parking lot, looking at distant hillsides, tree leaves, etc. I had the Alpen set up on a tripod side-by-side with an $1800 Swarovski ATS 65. I'm an unrepentent optics snob (Nightforce, Swarovski, Zeiss), and was there to buy the Swaro. With my eyes, that day, I couldn't see anywhere near enough of a difference in resolution, distortion, color, etc to choose the Swaro. In fact, I couldn't detect a difference at all. The guy I hunted with knew the guys at the store, they were hunters, and had compared the Alpens against the Swaro's & others extensively while mountain glassing, etc and had come to the same conclusion.
My eval was on a sunny day, so I wondered how the Alpen would compare in low light. If anyone has more good/bad info or experience on the Alpens I'd like to hear it. I'd be tickled to be talked back into a Swarovski, or Nikon or Leica or Zeiss spotter. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
http://www.alpenoutdoor.com/products/alpen_spotting_scopes.shtml