|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,339 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,339 Likes: 4 |
I must be the only guy on earth who doesn't go just dreamy whenever someone starts talking Sako 75s. Must admit I've only shot two, belonging to friends of mine, but wasn't impressed by either. I've handled probably a couple dozen in different shops here and there and have yet to cycle one that is remotely as smooth as either of the AVs I have. Now I realize I don't have near as much experience with Sako rifles as many of you here, but it'd sure seem like by now I'd have at least run across one that didn't feel like it had sand in the receiver.
It's my opinion Sako quit making really nice rifles somewhere back in the late 80s to early 90s. Am I alone here?
Don't mean to offend or stomp on any toes........although I'm sure I have.
Black Cows Matter!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,402 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,402 Likes: 2 |
I have two wood sako 75's a 300wm and .270 with a 7mag in ss/syn coming soon. I am very pleased with them. I really like the raised cheekpeice, it is one good looking rifle. I also like the detachable mag and the saftey set up along with the smooth action. The low bolt lift is also nice. As you can see I am won over with sako.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 172
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 172 |
Muleshow, you aren't the only one who is disappointed with the 75's. As you say, by comparison they are rough in operation and rough in finish. They aren't nearly the rifle the Finbear or the AV were.
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />
Dan in Arizona
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 871
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 871 |
I have had several Sako 75 models and have been lucky, in my part of the world, to handle a couple of the older models.
I have been very happy with the 280 that I have now as fit, smoothness of the action and accuracy have been great right out of the box and its smoothness keeps getting better. But I have seen examples in stores where, in at least one case, the stock looked like it should have been considered a 2nd. Fuzzy checkering etc... and the action was not glass smooth. So as much as I like Sako rifles I would not purchase one without handling it first.
But in comparing a 20-30 year old rifle to a new one, I think the older one will win out because it has been used. And from my experience use of an action will smooth it out even more over time.
Long
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,344
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,344 |
I have an older AV in 223 and a newer 75 S/S in 7mm Rem mag, the new one is every bit as smooth as the older one. Both are extremely accurate, a pleasure to shoot, I am a huge fan of the Sako 75, in fact I prefer the appearance of the current wood stocked models to the older ones with the more pronounced stock angles.
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly gun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,749
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,749 |
I have 2 AV's and 8 model 75's. My 75's are as smooth or smoother than the AV's. They all shoot extremely well, especially a couple of the 75's. My favorite stock is the classic style on my older 223 but a couple of my newer 75 Hunters have some nice wood on them. If you gave me a choice of the same caliber in an AV or 75 with equally nice wood I'd probably choose the 75. Different strokes for different folks but both are great............DJ
Remember this is all supposed to be for fun.......................
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278 |
I have had experience with one 75, my son's finlight. It is excellent and very smooth. to me it's light years better than any of the old Sako's that I have handled.
Lefty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 588
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 588 |
I shot three of my Sakos today and another for a friend. I won't be getting rid of any of my Sakos.
SPAD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,794
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,794 |
I have 3 AV's and wish I had more. The 75's that I have handled have been slick as glass. I owned a TRG for a while and that action felt like it had ball bearings in the action. I didn't like the stock, but the action couldn't get any better. Flinch
Flinch Outdoor Gear broadhead extractor. The best device for pulling your head out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 265
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 265 |
One of the guys I work with is the type who seems to go out of his way to let people know he shoots a sako. Not long ago, he buys a Savage 110 package rifle for his son's first hunting season. You should hear him complain about this "cheap rifle" outshooting his sako. LMAO.
That said, sakos are great rifles. The early finnbears were as good as a bolt action gets IMO. If I hadn't had such a negative customer service experience with Beretta several years ago, I'd consider a new sako in 6.5 Swede.
"The peasants may be conned by every pitchman that introduces a new super magnum, but the members of the cognoscenti stick with classic calibers." Jack O'Conner
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,460
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,460 |
I have 2 Sakos, and yesterday I found the first type of factory ammo that wouldn't shot into an inch or so with either rifle. It was green box Remington 7mm-08 with 140 gr. Core-lokts. Every other factory load I have tried with these two rifles (the other is a .280) have gone into appox. 1 inch, some much less.
|
|
|
|
474 members (10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 1beaver_shooter, 10ring1, 160user, 12344mag, 58 invisible),
2,619
guests, and
1,133
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,532
Posts18,530,954
Members74,038
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|