|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,627 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,627 Likes: 1 |
Just picked up the mag, just to read this dang article!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87 |
Long time reader, short time poster here. Just thought I'd chime in with my $0.02. I think the reason people get stuck on pressure so much is because it just makes sense. People figure:
faster twist = harder to push a bullet = higher pressure
It also makes sense that pressure will be higher if you think about it from the perspective of energy. The energy of a bullet is equal to it kinetic energy plus it rotational energy. So a bullet fired from a 1:8 twist 223 at the same velocity of as a bullet that comes out of a 1:12 twist 223 will have more total energy because it is spinning faster. How does it get more energy? The only way is to increase the work done on the bullet. Work = force x distance, and the force on the bullet comes from pressure. Obviously pressure isn't constant as a bullet moves down the barrel, but in general you have to increase the average pressure to increase velocity.
With all these thoughts swirling in my head I thought I'd run some numbers. A 55 grain bullet at 3300 fps will have about 1330 ft-lb of kinetic energy. At that velocity a 1:12 twist bullet will spin at 3300 rev/s and a 1:8 twist bullet will spin at 4950 rev/s. Rotational energy is 1/2 x moment of inertia x angular velocity^2. For simplicity I calculated a moment of inertia for a cylindrical shape. After plugging everything and making a few units conversions I got the following:
1:8 twist rotational energy = 5.1 ft-lb 1:12 twist rotational energy = 2.3 ft-lb
Pretty much negligible compared to 1330 ft-lb. If your gun has 22 in barrel, the extra force on the bullet to get that extra 2.8 ft-lb of energy is 1.6 lb. It takes 124 psi on the back of a 0.224-in diameter bullet to get that force. Again, it's important to note I'm talking about the average increase over the length of the barrel and not an increase in peak pressure. Also, due to inefficiency, I would guess the actual increase in pressure to be somewhat higher. Still, even if the increase is on the order of 500 psi the change is less than 1% of 60,000 psi. Somebody with more experience than me can chime in, but I would have to wonder if a strain gauge on a pressure barrel would even catch that.
Long story short. The idea of fast twist = higher pressure makes sense intuitively, but the numbers don't add up.
PS Feel free to double check math, this was a rush job.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,738
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 8,738 |
Doesn't take near the energy to spin a bullet as it does to accelerate or push it through air. And if it won't spin in the barrel, it will just rip the jacket off. No ballistic lab to back me up, but makes sense if you turn one in your fingers, throw it in the air, or take a pare of pliers to it. FWIW.....my .02�
Sean
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,333 Likes: 32
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,333 Likes: 32 |
How should one go about breaking in a fast twist barrel?
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755 |
He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.
- Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
How should one go about breaking in a fast twist barrel? Spit on your pinky and put it in the chamber. Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1 |
Long time reader, short time poster here. Just thought I'd chime in with my $0.02. I think the reason people get stuck on pressure so much is because it just makes sense. People figure:
faster twist = harder to push a bullet = higher pressure
It also makes sense that pressure will be higher if you think about it from the perspective of energy. The energy of a bullet is equal to it kinetic energy plus it rotational energy. So a bullet fired from a 1:8 twist 223 at the same velocity of as a bullet that comes out of a 1:12 twist 223 will have more total energy because it is spinning faster. How does it get more energy? The only way is to increase the work done on the bullet. Work = force x distance, and the force on the bullet comes from pressure. Obviously pressure isn't constant as a bullet moves down the barrel, but in general you have to increase the average pressure to increase velocity.
With all these thoughts swirling in my head I thought I'd run some numbers. A 55 grain bullet at 3300 fps will have about 1330 ft-lb of kinetic energy. At that velocity a 1:12 twist bullet will spin at 3300 rev/s and a 1:8 twist bullet will spin at 4950 rev/s. Rotational energy is 1/2 x moment of inertia x angular velocity^2. For simplicity I calculated a moment of inertia for a cylindrical shape. After plugging everything and making a few units conversions I got the following:
1:8 twist rotational energy = 5.1 ft-lb 1:12 twist rotational energy = 2.3 ft-lb
Pretty much negligible compared to 1330 ft-lb. If your gun has 22 in barrel, the extra force on the bullet to get that extra 2.8 ft-lb of energy is 1.6 lb. It takes 124 psi on the back of a 0.224-in diameter bullet to get that force. Again, it's important to note I'm talking about the average increase over the length of the barrel and not an increase in peak pressure. Also, due to inefficiency, I would guess the actual increase in pressure to be somewhat higher. Still, even if the increase is on the order of 500 psi the change is less than 1% of 60,000 psi. Somebody with more experience than me can chime in, but I would have to wonder if a strain gauge on a pressure barrel would even catch that.
Long story short. The idea of fast twist = higher pressure makes sense intuitively, but the numbers don't add up.
PS Feel free to double check math, this was a rush job. Good post, but that's because I like math.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327 |
Firth,
If you continue to provide accurate data and analysis, and good common sense, you will probably be in trouble here.
You will be messing with the minds of the totally convinced who have no basis for their convictions, but feel very strongly about them.
I'm waiting for someone to chime in and say that your data would be different if a rifle has a left hand twist instead of a right hand twist.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12 |
Firth,
If you continue to provide accurate data and analysis, and good common sense, you will probably be in trouble here.
You will be messing with the minds of the totally convinced who have no basis for their convictions, but feel very strongly about them.
I'm waiting for someone to chime in and say that your data would be different if a rifle has a left hand twist instead of a right hand twist.
Steve The angular velocity vector would point the other way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
And what about the Coriolis effect???
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,224 Likes: 9
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,224 Likes: 9 |
And what about the Coriolis effect??? Can you get those in the leopard skin pattern...? DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12 |
And what about the Coriolis effect??? Can you get those in the leopard skin pattern...? DF You're getting dangerously close to the cornholius effect.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
Now, dats a good one!
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,653 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,653 Likes: 1 |
And what about the Coriolis effect??? Can you get those in the leopard skin pattern...? DF You're getting dangerously close to the cornholius effect. The Swedish judge gives it an 7.8 plus one bonus point for taking a poke at Ingwe! Errrr... wait, in light of the topic of discussion and that Ingwe is involved, my phrase "taking a poke at Ingwe" does not sound quite right either! John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,327 |
Firth,
When it comes to guns and stuff, the guys who posted after I did really do know what they are talking about.
The other extraneous issues they brought up are just plain funny.
But in any event, welcome to the Fire.
Steve
Last edited by 7x57STEVE; 11/29/12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12 |
I should have thanked Firth for taking the time to quantitatively make the point. When this subject was hashed a while back I did a similar calculation which indicated, to me at least, the differences in angular KE ought to be lost in the noise.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,967
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,967 |
A little late to the party, but good post, Firth.
Nice when people take the time to quantify a few things and squash old wives tales with facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,366
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,366 |
I am guessing then that a gain twist would hep both problems; pressure and stability. Just guessing mind you. Cheers NC They tried that in the Carcano.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,032
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,032 |
Long time reader, short time poster here. Just thought I'd chime in with my $0.02. I think the reason people get stuck on pressure so much is because it just makes sense. People figure:
faster twist = harder to push a bullet = higher pressure
It also makes sense that pressure will be higher if you think about it from the perspective of energy. The energy of a bullet is equal to it kinetic energy plus it rotational energy. So a bullet fired from a 1:8 twist 223 at the same velocity of as a bullet that comes out of a 1:12 twist 223 will have more total energy because it is spinning faster. How does it get more energy? The only way is to increase the work done on the bullet. Work = force x distance, and the force on the bullet comes from pressure. Obviously pressure isn't constant as a bullet moves down the barrel, but in general you have to increase the average pressure to increase velocity.
With all these thoughts swirling in my head I thought I'd run some numbers. A 55 grain bullet at 3300 fps will have about 1330 ft-lb of kinetic energy. At that velocity a 1:12 twist bullet will spin at 3300 rev/s and a 1:8 twist bullet will spin at 4950 rev/s. Rotational energy is 1/2 x moment of inertia x angular velocity^2. For simplicity I calculated a moment of inertia for a cylindrical shape. After plugging everything and making a few units conversions I got the following:
1:8 twist rotational energy = 5.1 ft-lb 1:12 twist rotational energy = 2.3 ft-lb
Pretty much negligible compared to 1330 ft-lb. If your gun has 22 in barrel, the extra force on the bullet to get that extra 2.8 ft-lb of energy is 1.6 lb. It takes 124 psi on the back of a 0.224-in diameter bullet to get that force. Again, it's important to note I'm talking about the average increase over the length of the barrel and not an increase in peak pressure. Also, due to inefficiency, I would guess the actual increase in pressure to be somewhat higher. Still, even if the increase is on the order of 500 psi the change is less than 1% of 60,000 psi. Somebody with more experience than me can chime in, but I would have to wonder if a strain gauge on a pressure barrel would even catch that.
Long story short. The idea of fast twist = higher pressure makes sense intuitively, but the numbers don't add up.
PS Feel free to double check math, this was a rush job. nice post, but I prefer guessing and feelings.
Uber Demanding Rifle Aficionado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,720
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,720 |
And what about the Coriolis effect??? Can you get those in the leopard skin pattern...? DF You're getting dangerously close to the cornholius effect. The Swedish judge gives it an 7.8 plus one bonus point for taking a poke at Ingwe! Errrr... wait, in light of the topic of discussion and that Ingwe is involved, my phrase "taking a poke at Ingwe" does not sound quite right either! John I'll bet you will get GFY shorty....just sayin'
Come on America, Athletes and actors are not heroes, only soldiers, airmen,marines and sailors get that respect�and let's add firemen and LEO's
|
|
|
|
223 members (1OntarioJim, 22kHornet, 06hunter59, 320090T, 257 roberts, 3dtestify, 21 invisible),
1,190
guests, and
962
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,093
Posts18,522,161
Members74,026
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|