|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568 |
I have a Canon 100-400 IS lens, and I'm thinking on getting a 1.5X, or 2X multiplier for it. Any suggestions on a good one to buy? I tried one out at a local camera store, and found that it didn't function on auto focus. Are they all that way?I had to put it on manual and focus it that way. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000 |
Get the Canon EOS 1.4x or 2x teleconverter, you should have full functionality in terms of autofocus, exposure and IS. They're expensive, but so was your lens. Putting a cheap teleconverter on a good lens is both a waste of money and a waste of a good lens. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/732113-USA/Canon_4409B002_Extender_EF_1_4X_III.html
Last edited by Oregon45; 04/13/13.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 796
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 796 |
Not quite that simple, At 400mm that lens is a 5.6 aperture lens. By adding the extender you are effectively changing the aperture to f8 or f11 and unless you're shooting a pro body it will not auto focus.
Capt Ron
Magnolia Bluff, FL..............Where Heaven is a local call!
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568 |
Yes, I'm very much aware that a teleconverter will slow my lens down. And clarity over long distances will be affected too, but anytime you shoot through lots of air, that's going to happen, with any lens. I can counter the slower lens speed with increasing my ISO, so not worried about that. Increasing ISO doesn't do much to the grain like it used to with film. I'm shooting a 40D now, and will be getting a 70D, once they are released. The word has it that the 70D will be released later in April. But it does make sense to get a good converter to go with a good lens. I'm not going to go with a cheaper after market converter to put on my 100/400 IS len. You get what you pay for, as they say. Thanks for your info.
Last edited by hunter01; 04/13/13.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
I am interested to see your results.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,776 |
I have used Canon multipliers with L series glass for a few years. From a 300 F 2.8, 70-200 F 2.8 IS, or my favorite a 135 F 2.
Buy the Canon and don't look back. I prefer the multiplier with fixed lenses for several reasons. Image quality degrades with the multiplier, a faster lens helps offset the loss.
You can't be using a 100-400 indoors to any successful degree, really nor should you, so the multiplier may be of some advantage to you in bright light.
ISO is not a fix all for having a 'slower' lens, sure it may help in a pinch, but it is a crutch that does not address the real problem.
Hope this helps
The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment. � WARREN G. BENNIS
|
|
|
|
617 members (10gaugemag, 1badf350, 163bc, 12344mag, 06hunter59, 16gage, 57 invisible),
3,038
guests, and
1,279
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,965
Posts18,519,560
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|