Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire would they throw Hillary to the dogs?

Gee...ABC, too. They will have to put an extra soft lens on Dianne tonite...:)


ABC

If the media got to the point that they felt someone had to go down, and they had to choose betwixt Hilarious or �bama, I guaranfockingtee it won't be �bama.

Now THAT would be a very good thing. You know that hildebeast wouldn't take that lying down. She would go on the attack against obamba like a homo on a hot dog.

No sef respecting dog would have her, I'd wager.

No. The only thing more important than protecting the King is ensuring that his heir receives her birthright.

Throw her to the dogs. Hell I thought she's been in that company for a long time. Willy sure did it was every other bitch before Hildabeast.

Lets hope they would

No they won't cuz her 2 terms as Pres guarantee continuance and expansion of Obamacare, their dream.

Not that I would do that....But I sure as heck don't blame him.

"What difference does it make"? That statement will hang around her neck like an anchor.

"At this point, what difference does it make?" ( quote from thunder thighs ). That statement alone and the fact that she got away with it tells volumes about the media's bias. Imagine if that had been said by a Republican. Sorry, no bus for either.

..and right on cue.
________

No scandal in Benghazi deaths

Associated Press / May 10, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) � Politicians love few things better than a scandal to trip up their opponents, and Republicans hope last year�s fatal attack on U.S. diplomats in Libya will do exactly that to Hillary Rodham Clinton and other Democrats.


History suggests it might be a tough lift. The issue is complex, the next presidential election is more than three years away, and a number of reports and officials have disputed criticisms of Clinton�s role when she was secretary of state.


Still, Republicans and conservative talk hosts are hammering away at Clinton�s and the Obama administration�s handling of the 8-month-old tragedy. A daylong House Oversight Committee hearing Wednesday starred three State Department officials invited by Republicans.


Security was poorly handled in Benghazi, Libya, they said, and administration officials later tried to obscure what happened.


Clinton, seen by many as the early Democratic favorite for president in 2016, generally drew strong reviews for her four-year stint as secretary of state. Her darkest moment was the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi.


Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed. Top administration officials initially said the attackers were spontaneous protesters, angry about an anti-Islamic video. But they later acknowledged the attackers were well-equipped terrorists acting under plans.


A major independent inquiry largely absolved Clinton of wrongdoing.


The findings incensed many Republican leaders and conservative news outlets, who portray Benghazi as a simmering scandal about to erupt.


The three officials testifying Wednesday offered little that has not been aired in previous congressional hearings. Afterward, Republicans all but acknowledged they�re still seeking a knockout punch.


��This hearing is now over, but this investigation is not,�� said Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the hard-charging Republican chairman of the House committee. He urged ��whistle-blowers�� and ��witnesses who have been afraid to come forward�� to step up and ��tell us your story, and we will make sure it gets public.��


Republicans hope public anger over the Benghazi attacks and their aftermath will besmirch congressional Democrats in next year�s midterm elections.


By late Wednesday, Democrats expressed confidence.


��The unsubstantiated Republican allegations about Benghazi disintegrated one by one,�� said Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the House committee�s top Democrat. ��There�s no evidence of a conspiracy to withhold military assets for political reasons, no evidence of a cover-up.��


Ethical lapses and even full-blown scandals have a mixed record of influencing U.S. elections. Watergate not only forced Richard Nixon from the White House in August 1974; it also triggered crushing losses for congressional Republicans in midterm elections three months later.


President Gerald Ford�s pardon of Nixon may have ended any hope he had of defeating Jimmy Carter in 1976.


Other scandals, however, did far less political damage. The Iran-Contra affair of Ronald Reagan�s second term and Bill Clinton�s affair with Monica Lewinsky did not prevent either man�s vice president from winning the popular vote in the next presidential election.


More recently, Virginia Democrats were crowing about news that Gov. Bob McDonnell�a potential GOP presidential contender�accepted large, unreported gifts from a businessman. A short time later, a Washington Post poll showed high approval ratings for McDonnell and scant public interest in the budding ��scandal�� that titillated the state�s political elite.


Some Democratic campaign veterans say the Benghazi affair is too complex and too muddled to swing national elections next year and in 2016.


��The Republicans are pulling out the stops to manufacture a scandal, but it�s not likely to stick on Hillary Clinton or Democrats in general,�� said veteran Clinton strategist Doug Hattaway.


Republicans seem determined to push on. House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio on Thursday asked President Barack Obama to direct the State Department to release internal emails, sent the day after the Benghazi attacks, regarding the deadly assault. ��This is his chance to show his cooperation so that we can get to the truth of what happened in Benghazi,�� Boehner said.


On Wednesday, Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin showed little concern about the larger impact on politics. ��I don�t think there�s a smoking gun today,�� he told the House panel. ��I don�t think there�s a lukewarm slingshot.��

just grinning here, regardless...

I think they will, to make way for a real liberal next election--
lets just hope she is easier on the eyes...:)

Two birds with one shot. Wouldn't that be something.

Nope, she is the 2016 dmocratic hopeful for president.

Y'all should have took Issa to the hog hunt.

Maybe he could have got a feeling of bloodthirst and go for the throat(s).

The juice is there, just ain't no one squeezing.

Yep

Obama could put an end to her presidential ambition any time he wishes, just by directing the State Department to dish on her.

Hillary has rivals within the Democratic Party. What would they give Obama to see Hillary fail?

Please tell me you're kidding me. I suddenly feel as ill as when Obie got reelected. This has to be the most corrupt government that i've had to endure yet

Most people don't remember what happened last week. (Or care) Three years from now is a long time.