24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 629
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 629
Spot on Bfly! cool

GB1

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,148
Likes: 2
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,148
Likes: 2
Another double rifle option from Louisiana by some good folks.

DF

http://www.clarkcustomguns.com/DblRifle.html

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Gary O
Are you folks suggesting that we are stuck with 100 year old ammo and double rifle design? Compare the cost of 416 Rigby ammo with 416 Rem ammo. Same ballistics; huge price and component difference. If you are saying that all double rifle and ammo development reached it's zenith in England 100 years ago, I guess I'll pass and stick with a modern bolt gun...


You should.
Doubles are like aspirins, you just can't improve on them. Even Krieghoff's attempt with the 500/416 (still a rimmed cartridge) can't compete in performance or popularity with the standard and 100 plus year old NE cartridges. The strongest action out there is the Dumas designed Verney-Carron Triple lock and even they will talk you out of a modern (rimmed) cartrige for a double, not only for the pressures but more importantly the extraction issues that could be a combination of pressure and a rimless case. I am and have always been a velocity "freak" for hunting, but doubles are an entirely different universe and just not designed for what you are seeking.


A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
I'd be happy with a 38-55 if it was stainless for under $1500. With lasers and CNC machines we should be able to have it.


There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
Those Clark Custom Guns look like a class act for the price. I have no idea from first hand , just saying they 'look' good. I would have to agree with the general sentiment that if Clark can buy actions from CZ and custom build a nice doubles for $5000. I would expect that CZ could offer a reasonable mass produced product for 1/2 that price.

Now that is not to satisy every oddball or new & improved fettish. A basic model classic chambered double. No stainless or plastic god forbid, please.

IC B2

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
Stainless cerracoated black would be fine. Properly funded I would be interested in one of the Clarks, probably a 30-40. Seems I always deer hunt in the rain and snow. I would have a hard time getting myself to lug a $5k beauty into a cedar swamp in freezing rain.


There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
yea, my practical hunting guns dont look anything like my fantasy play toys. To be honest, I pretty much have one hunting rifle a 7mm-08 for 90% rifle hunting. A double (If I could afford one) would be just another fun gun.

The only time I had a rust problem was Florida. And even there it was sitting in my trunk it rusted to heck. Real bad- real fast. I never had a gun actually rust while I was carrying it around. I see you are in Maine. My problem around here has been rain turn to ice on my gun. Optics have been more a foul weather issue, not wood or blue steel. I do sometimes resort to an iron sited lever or even an H&R single is foul weather. Both blue steel and wood, seem to handle rain ok.

Come to think of it, I have an H&R scoped 20ga for Mass deer with a synthetic stock. I though a nice black stock looked better than cheesy birch factory stock and lighter too. I may have started with a youth model. I forget now. Anyway, nothing is cast in stone. Except I dont have any rambo black, banana clip rattatattat guns. They dont both me, I just dont want one.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,253
Likes: 2
LOL, same here Fourbore, an old Ruger Hawkeye S/S in 358 Winchester gets the nod for 90% of my centerfire rifle hunting duty, the purty ones sure fun to hunt with though, weather permitting of course. blush

Gunner


Trump Won!
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
My Hawkeye RSI 308 has become my go to gun, with a 45-70 stainless Guide Gun with peeps for the nasty weather days. Been totin' ta 12ga over 7x57R too, closest I have to a double rifle. 3" slug or buckshot and a 150 Partition is fairly formidable.


There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,369
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,369
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Gary O
Are you folks suggesting that we are stuck with 100 year old ammo and double rifle design? Compare the cost of 416 Rigby ammo with 416 Rem ammo. Same ballistics; huge price and component difference. If you are saying that all double rifle and ammo development reached it's zenith in England 100 years ago, I guess I'll pass and stick with a modern bolt gun...


Go get a bolt gun. They reached the pinnacle of development in 1898.

Last edited by hatari; 05/20/13.

"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 971
A 416 Rigby in a magnum Mauser - perfect.

Is my newfangled 7mm-08 any better than a 7x57? Heck No. I got former based on my choice of rifle, not based on any ballistic advantages.

Several builders, in my memory, did offer 458Win and 375beltedH&H in quality doubles. I am sure one could still be special ordered. I expect the resale value would be right in the toilet - so; the buyer had better really want one.

Things have sure changed during my lifetime. Today anyone with a few bucks can have any reasonable firearm they desire. Now, go online and try and build a consensus, that is whole different story. Short of wining an online debate, anyone can go as modern or old fashioned as they want.

God? Do you remember all the whinny and crying back in the 1960's and 70's about lack of any DG 40 cal? How many available now (factory loaded) 6, 8 or 10? Dare I say: "too many"?



Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,114
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,114
Originally Posted by Gary O
Are you folks suggesting that we are stuck with 100 year old ammo and double rifle design? Compare the cost of 416 Rigby ammo with 416 Rem ammo. Same ballistics; huge price and component difference. If you are saying that all double rifle and ammo development reached it's zenith in England 100 years ago, I guess I'll pass and stick with a modern bolt gun...


Now that you bring it up, I, too have wondered why cartridges for my .416 Rigby are so much more expensive than cartridges for a .416 Remington. Also, .470 N.E ammunition is more than twice as expensive as .50 BMG. 28 gauge shotshells cost a lot more than 12 gauge shells. Why?

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
I would think its due to economies of scale on what can be built off the basic case. .416 Remington basic brass can be turned into any of the belted mags prior to final forming into 416 Remington, so the tooling costs are spread over a much greater number of cases. Not much else you can turn 416 rugby basic brass into that's commercially popular. As to 50 bmg vs the ne calibers I'm sure that me brass would be cheaper if the military bought millions of .470 nitro cases a year. It's a lot cheaper to run off some extra cases for the civilian market when you have the military purchases paying most of the sunk costs for producing a product line

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
This.


A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,278
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,278
Originally Posted by Kellywk
I would think its due to economies of scale on what can be built off the basic case. .416 Remington basic brass can be turned into any of the belted mags prior to final forming into 416 Remington, so the tooling costs are spread over a much greater number of cases. Not much else you can turn 416 rugby basic brass into that's commercially popular. As to 50 bmg vs the ne calibers I'm sure that me brass would be cheaper if the military bought millions of .470 nitro cases a year. It's a lot cheaper to run off some extra cases for the civilian market when you have the military purchases paying most of the sunk costs for producing a product line


That is exactly right. In any production process, at least based on my working for various manufacturing companies over the years, volume allows cost reductions.

That is why various military cartridges, such as 7 mm, 30-06, 308, 556, etc., to name a few, have become so popular in the civilian market. Also, there is usually availability of surplus cartridges at attractive prices.

Take .470 nitro express as a contrast. First offered by Joseph Lang around 1906, based on the .500 3-1/4" case, it has been perhaps the most popular big bore double cartridge because Lang released it to the trade, but think how many rifles have been made for it in the past 100 years.

Yes, Rigby favored it and made a bunch, but so what? There simply are not that many.

Even if you count all of the other flanged cartridges based on the .500 3-1/4" case, including my 500/450, we are not talking about big volumes � not even remotely comparable to the .404 Jeffrey or 9.3x62, which are not found in that many gun stores.

Thus the properly-designed cartridges specific to the double rifles are always going to be more expensive than those more suitable for bolt-action rifles for two reasons: there have never been that many double rifles and there is not high enough volume demand for the ammo to justify production cost savings.

I've been through Jim Bell's plant in Illinois, where he made obsolete cartridge brass. He had acquired military surplus extrusion machinery for pennies on the dollar. In fact, I seem to recall that he may have bought it by the pound. Nonetheless, his production costs were high because of the low demand, even though he supplied some of the big name rifle makers. Those realities are never going to change.

Others have mentioned the significant advantage in extraction of the old nitro express cases, due to the flange and taper. Many have tried rimless cases and most have concluded that the cost advantage is outweighed by dependability.

One final thing that I haven't seen mentioned, but which double owners understand.
They are not designed for indefinite use at high pressures. Over time, the action will loosen and "come off the face." Think about it. If that is so, do you really want to use a high pressure round like a .416 Rem Mag?

Yes, rifles can be tightened up again. My 500/450 built in 1905 was. But think about the cost and whether it balances with the puny savings in choosing a less reliable, higher pressure cartridge that was not designed for doubles, but rather for stronger bolt actions. eek


Norman Solberg
International lawyer, lately for 25 years in Japan, now working on trusts in the US, the 3rd greatest tax haven. NRA Life Member for over 50 years, NRA Endowment (2014), Patron (2016).
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,505
I
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
I
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,505
A bold rifle will not extract a case unless an extractor fits in the cartridge groove. Sometimes the extractor must ride over the case to load it.

What's wrong with applying the same principle (and same dimensions of extractors) to a double? Why wouldn't it be equally reliable?


Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.

Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,381
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,381
Originally Posted by Gary O
So we're stuck with 100 year old guns and ammo? Ever compare the cost of 416 rigby vs. 416 Rem mag ammo?


No, you can buy modern guns and ammo. Consider that what you consider as an alternative, the bolt rifle, are (mostly) based on the 98 Mauser which itself is a 115 year old design. You can make a double run on rimless cases, but it's not ideal. Same as you can make a bolt rifle feed rimmed cases, but it's not right either. You can pick up a sheet of plywood with a Porsche or road race a Dodge Dually, but neither is realty suited for that job.

And I've never compared prices for 416 Rigby or 416 Remington ammo. I handload.


"This duty fell upon me and was the worst job I ever had in my life.
I have known men I would rather shoot than the worst of dogs."

Frank Wild
Second in Command
Endurance 1914-1916
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

503 members (12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 160user, 10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 50 invisible), 2,281 guests, and 1,168 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,510
Posts18,490,768
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.214s Queries: 49 (0.007s) Memory: 0.8940 MB (Peak: 0.9997 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 13:01:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS