|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,742 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,742 Likes: 2 |
I won a pair of these earlier this year at a company event. I took them on a week long hunt in South Carolina, and I must say they have the singularly worst depth of field of any bino I've ever used. When zooming in, as they come to focus there is a "pow!" and the sight picture is crystal clear at the aim point, but, trying to peer a bit deeper or shallower into cover is impossible, and a fractional adjustment loses the focus. Maybe not an issue to others, but I gave them away at the end of the hunt and crawled back home to my Leicas...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,140
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,140 |
Spent some time with these elk hunting in Co. this year. The glass is great, I will give them that. Other than that I wasnt impressed. To heavy, to bulky, to much slop in focus knob and the huge eye cups suck. Went to Sportsmans yesterday to check out another sample and confirm original thoughts. Salesman said they are a slow seller .
JMHO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,365
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,365 |
I am not impressed either I tried my nephews this year. We were linking over a herd at about 600 yards I could see the little spoke horns on a small bull with my 8x30 Swaro and we could not see the horns with his 8x42 Leopold heavy and not all that clear he is looking a pair of 8x30 now The majority of Binos are made in china. at the same plants just different specs.
Last edited by ehunter; 12/02/13.
If there is any proof of a man in a hunt it is not whether he killed a deer or elk but how he hunted it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91 |
Well I received my new McKinley 8x42 today and from the little bit that I have used them sofar I think they are great, extremly bright wide field of view and great depth of field glass is crystal clear from 50 yards to infinity, also I ware glasses and the eye relief is great for $399 I'm extremly happy will give them a further review later this week coyote hunting. The large ocular doesn't bother me at all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581 |
I won a pair of these earlier this year at a company event. I took them on a week long hunt in South Carolina, and I must say they have the singularly worst depth of field of any bino I've ever used. When zooming in, as they come to focus there is a "pow!" and the sight picture is crystal clear at the aim point, but, trying to peer a bit deeper or shallower into cover is impossible, and a fractional adjustment loses the focus. Maybe not an issue to others, but I gave them away at the end of the hunt and crawled back home to my Leicas... This sounds like a classic misalignment problem. Given the fact that depth of field decreases with increase in magnification, those do not sound right. The barrels have to be aligned both up and down and left and right. The three terms are dipvergence, which defines the up and down, convergence, which defines if one or both barrels overlap, and divergence, which defines whether or not the barrels axis gets further away from center to the outside. If these get far enough way, even it all three are in spec, the binocular will do what you describe. Likely you have a dipvergence problem as well as one or the other divergence or convergence as well. Since the binocular can be focused at a point, as would be the case in a factory check, that may well go unobserved. Send them to Leupold.
Steve
Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
|
|
|
|
610 members (10Glocks, 12344mag, 16Racing, 1234, 160user, 10gaugeman, 63 invisible),
2,501
guests, and
1,304
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,344
Posts18,526,913
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|