Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire It is not just cops

What? I couldn't hear you Drunk Cat.

Dammit, I want to hate Tom Cruise, but honestly, I like damned near every single one of his movies. I even liked "Oblivion".

Most of the idiots posting here have never been victims of crime.

They believe that men are angels, or that they will shape up because a community wants them to play along with others.

Step into any city on the planet and the people living there can tell you otherwise.

Newsflash, men are not angels...




Bring back the local lynch mobs! Because they were arbiters of justice!.... TFF...

TFF. Scary to think a so called professional would make such outrageous libelous comments thinking he's protected by some initial anonymity. Foolish and reckless,at a minimum.

If that's how you play your game, and if it's not the crock of schitt I suspect it is, I'd send a first year associate to make short,easy work of you... if the judge hadn't done so already.

Whatever do you do since there are no longer any phone booths in which you can change clothes?

Libelous? Really, you are the one who has accused people on this board, in this very thread, of being probationers. You do realize that false imputation of a crime is defamation per se in many jurisdictions don't you? Perhaps, you should back away slowly an quit making an ass out of yourself. You started this and no one will think less of you when you slink back to your corner office.

First off, I was never in police academy. Furthermore, after scoring 98th percentile on the entrance exam shortly after high school, and after being informed that my score put me in the first hiring slot, and that I should expect to be contacted in the next week or two about coming in for the physical, I was sent a letter informing me about the stay on the hiring process because a civil rights group sued the police department claiming the test was racist since no blacks made it into the first or second hiring slots based on their test scores.

Anything you've heard different has been the product of the fevered imaginations of the likes of Bob, who have ulterior motives for discrediting people with whom they cannot hold their own in honest debate.

PS This originally came up in the context of a thread about affirmative action.

I wish Rick would close the door. The party is full. All the cool kids are already here. Anybody worth having arrived a while ago.

Says the one that wants to do away with cops so that he can be the one in his neighborhood to determine justice. You're cracking me up!

BTW, I'm no LEO, nor have I ever been. So, nice try...

I never thought you were in police academy.

So the story is that you decided you didn't want to get into that sort of work environment and didn't pursue the follow up process, correct?

I don't want to do away with cops. But I'm not silly enough to think that our civilization would end if there weren't any, or a lot fewer of them anyway. Police as we know them are an invention of the last 100 years. Prior to that Anglo-Saxon civilization existed for 1,500 years with more or less no law enforcement that we would recognize.

Again...TFF. Bring it,lightweight. I'd love to expose the HS of you simpletons during the Discovery process.

In fact, instead of hiding behind your anonymity, man up and let us know where it is you practice,Perry. I'll be happy to educate your ass.

He didn't say you were a cop HAJ, he let in that you're a super hero, which we both know is true.

So the story is
==========

Good luck with that.

You must be a better attorney than me. When I was doing criminal defense I had a hell of a time proving the cops were lying on the stand.

So, let us get this straight. The biggest bomb thrower on the board. The guy who throws out childish insults right and left, is taking offense? Were you the guy who insisted on fighting after school and then wanted to call the cops after you got your eye dotted? Is that you?

It depends doesn't it? DWIs are the easiest because the statements all say the same thing, but there is always a DVD. So the jury can see that you're client wasn't swaying and wasn't slurring his words and so on and so forth. That is why DWIs only have a about a fifty percent conviction rate for those that actually go to trial.

"Immediately upon the subject rolling down his window, I noticed the strong odor of alcohol. The subject exhibited red bloodshot and glassy eyes, while slurring his words, and fumbling for his documents...."

Offense? You must be kidding. I said bring it on. I'm actually begging you.

You're full of schitt.

Bring what? You're the one threatening the lawsuits here.

No story about it. They eventually contacted hiring slot III, which is where I ended up after the court-ordered random jumble (placing candidates randomly, rather than by test score, in the three hiring slots was how the supposed racism in the test design was supposedly remedied). By then, however (about two years later) I was focused on matriculating college and applying to grad schools.