Home

That is because rightousness is more powerfull than evil. That is why George Washington was under gunned, under manned, under supplied and still won. The rightous looked into the eye of the evil and evil backed down. Evil is a coward like the BLM. We just need to stare them in the eye and stand up to them. This is why the only person they physically touched was a frail woman, noone else. They needed tazers on men like cowards. If we stand up, they will back down. Many here will say government employees will shoot us or round us up cause they don' want to loose their jobs and retirement plans. I say bull. Even satan said " a man will give up everything he has to save his life when talking to God about Job. These "men " are not going to risk their lives for a few dam cows and turtles. The BLM thugs knew full well they could easily have been all killed and there would be little defense on their part.

Well it proves one thing for sure the federal law enforcement will most definitely fire on civilians if given the order.

You know, people can read, but they don't understand a thing they read.

It means that the State will follow Federal law, and Federal law will be enforced. It's not a state thing as Bundle would have the morons believe.

and that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that has followed the history of this country

There's a lot of stupid going on, but not from the side your thinking. With the rest of your post my response is..... HUH? Thanks I lost 10 IQ points reading your post.

Well it proves one thing for sure the federal law enforcement will most definitely fire on civilians if given the order from the Fuehrer regardless who the Fuehrer is. And I would imagine most local law enforcement from city to state will do the same thing.

You needn't imagine.

Over 200 LEOs from twenty-some agencies from the local LVMPD to the assorted state and federal 'alphabets' were reputed to be on sight and all were party to the abuses perpetrated and were there to fire on Americans if given any opportunity.

Two things stand out in that video. A bunch of clowns that have never followed any rules and another bunch that has never enforced any.

It does seem that Nevada is not a sovereign state which probably explains why prostitution is still legal in Nevada that is the only state where it is.

Only Indian reservations are mostly sovereign.

Apparantly you don't even read much, like the Bill of Rights and/or the Constitution.

Try Article I section 8 in the US Constitution and the 10th ammend. of the Bill of Rights, you know, the one about states rights.

Just because the feds have gotten away with supposed "authority" over the states doesn't mean they have constitutional authority to do so. The whole point of the development of the fed gubbermint by the founders was to protect the rights of the individuals of the country as a whole, and to make sure the states did so as well. The states were never to be subservient to the feds, quite the contrary, but unfortunately this fact eludes many here.

If he indeed follows Nevada's laws, he should note this part in the Nevada State Constitution, Article 1, Section 2:

"All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it. But the Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States; and no power exists in the people of this or any other State of the Federal Union to dissolve their connection therewith or perform any act tending to impair, subvert, or resist the Supreme Authority of the government of the United States. The Constitution of the United States confers full power on the Federal Government to maintain and Perpetuate its existence, and whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the [b]Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority."[/b]

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

You know, people can read, but they don't understand a thing they read.

It means that the State will follow Federal law, and Federal law will be enforced. It's not a state thing as Bundle would have the morons believe.

If he indeed follows Nevada's laws, he should note this part in the Nevada State Constitution, Article 1, Section 2:

"All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it. But the Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States; and no power exists in the people of this or any other State of the Federal Union to dissolve their connection therewith or perform any act tending to impair, subvert, or resist the Supreme Authority of the government of the United States. The Constitution of the United States confers full power on the Federal Government to maintain and Perpetuate its existence, and whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the [b]Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority."[/b]

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, still in effect, was passed to prevent U.S. military personnel from acting as law enforcement agents on U.S. soil.

While the Act is seen as an essential element of the American civil liberties framework, it originally represented a profound betrayal of African-American Southerners by the federal government. In the Reconstruction years following the American Civil War, U.S. troops were stationed in the South to protect recently-freed black slaves, allowing them to vote and function as free people. But when Republicans agreed to end Reconstruction in exchange for electoral votes during the controversial 1876 presidential election, they sold out black Southerners, who were condemned to a near-century of Jim Crow laws with almost no federal protection. The Posse Comitatus Act, which withdrew U.S. troops from Southern soil, was a central part of this betrayal.

The text of the Posse Comitatus Act, which is still in effect (as 18 U.S.C. Section 1385), reads:
Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Today, the Posse Comitatus Act has taken on a very different meaning from the one that it had in 1878. No longer associated with Reconstruction, it is a useful way to prevent the U.S. armed forces from directing their efforts against U.S. dissident groups. Public sentiment in favor of the Posse Comitatus Act is so strong that a 2006 law permitting an exception to the Act in cases of public disasters (in response to Hurricane Katrina) was repealed a year later.

Well SB there's 7 reservatons here in Montana, and I can tell you for certain that they are way more sovereign than us. They have no taxes, abide by different laws, have casino's hunt when they want, etc etc etc. They even have signs on the lake that say "ONLY TRIBAL MEMBERS ALLOWED ON BEACH"

I could go on but thats a whole other topic.

It is astounding to read folks comparing mistakes by a single rancher, to the debacle we just witnessed by agencies of the United States Government, and/or any Nevada state or local law enforcement.

Now, the armed force is another matter altogether.

Let's see if your reading skills are as good as you want others to be.

It doesn't stop Federal lawmen from acting. How does that make Bundy right?

When did they send in the army? I must of missed that too.