If that liberal, neocon, RINO, Romney, repeats his dismal '12 performance when he was landslides by an even bigger moron, he will assure Hillary's Oval Office waltz.
There is absolutely no ideological difference between Romeny and Obama. They were equally paired liberals.
Please do not lose sight of the fact that was exposed to American constituents in '12: authentic conservatives will never again vote for a liberal, neocon, RINO. If you guys nominate another, I can tell you right now how it'll turn out.
Authentic conservatives know that there is no substantive difference between liberal, neocon, RINO's and their ringleaders of the Democratic Party.
�If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.� ***US President James Madison***
Agreed. They did. Lowering incentives to seek tax shelters by reducing rates results in higher revenues and stimulates economic activity..
TRH,
I agree that we are in desperate need of economic reform. But that lies far beneath the iceberg that will sink America. We have to revert to the principles upon which our nation was founded. We have to restore rule of law. Rule of men is destroying our country. As important or more so, we MUST restore lost liberties. Land of the free has become a cruel joke. We're free to do and buy what politicians and bureaucrats allow us to do or buy. Worse, we've fastened shackles to ourselves.
We need a forth branch of government: public integrity unit. It will be staffed from investigators on loan to it for five years. These investigators will come from local law enforcement agencies. They will not be subjected to federal political/bureaucratic pressure. They will be commissioned with ultimate autonomy. They will have plenary authority and jurisdiction to investigate every elected politician and appointed bureaucrat including the president and US Supreme Court justices. If criminal charges are determined to be warranted, case agents will refer their cases to independent attorneys who must have impeccable records prior to appointment. That way, Lerner's homeboys won't be investigating her. Instead, it could well be that an investigator on loan from Seattle Police Department will be the case agent, not some lackey working in Obama's US DOJ. That way again, there will be no fox guarding the henhouse.
High on the list is evicting the UN from Manhattan, eliminating the Fed, and severing ties with every treaty that binds our military to fight battles that are none of our damned business. Presidents have transformed our military in to Meyer Lansky's Murder, Inc.
In no way, shape, or form does the country in which we live resemble the country that was the patrimony of our Founding Fathers.
�Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.� ***Benjamin Franklin***
�If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.� ***US President James Madison***
I refuse to believe that the "middle" elected Obama. If the "middle" did that, then we are totally screwed.
The middle did elect Obama, and there were two very big reasons they did it.
1 - McCain 2 - Romney
McCain is a freaking nut! The guy is seriously out there and it's no secret. EVERYONE in congress has a story when McCain has gone bat-chit crazy. And the electorate knew he was a nut.
Romney has been on both sides of every issue under the sun and he comes across as a guy who stands for nothing but getting elected.
Then factor in the financial collapse which happened on Bush's watch. It doesn't matter if it was or wasn't Bush's fault, the dumb people just saw the economy come unraveled on Bush's watch; so it has to be his fault.
Just like a friend of mine who in 2009 was having hard economic times and blamed it all on Obama. Nevermind that the trouble started a full year before Obama took office, it's just who's in there when it all comes crashing down.
The "middle" did not elect anybody, and only liberals believe they did. The numbers show that approximately 4 million less Republicans have voted in each of the last three Presidential elections. When the choices are a Democrat, or a Republican that acts like a Democrat, lots of conservatives lose faith in the game and don't play. This will continue as long as Wall Street and the Roves make sure a pussified RINO is the candidate.
The only thing worse than a liberal is a liberal that thinks they're a conservative.
The "middle" did not elect anybody, and only liberals believe they did. The numbers show that approximately 4 million less Republicans have voted in each of the last three Presidential elections. When the choices are a Democrat, or a Republican that acts like a Democrat, lots of conservatives lose faith in the game and don't play. This will continue as long as Wall Street and the Roves make sure a pussified RINO is the candidate.
Absolutely right on the mark.
The middle is a fabrication of the lame stream media,who believe they can dupe citizens into moving left with their inane lies.
Communist Goals
26. Present homosexuality and degeneracy as normal. 27. Discredit the Bible. 28. Eliminate prayer in the schools.
Wouldn't he have to be substantially different than the opposition to crush them?
Seems like an "if ya can't beat em join em strategy" but I know many Republicans care only about winning so I suppose it makes sense. A republican big gov't commie is better than a democratic one?
I refuse to believe that the "middle" elected Obama. If the "middle" did that, then we are totally screwed.
The middle did elect Obama, and there were two very big reasons they did it.
1 - McCain 2 - Romney
McCain is a freaking nut! The guy is seriously out there and it's no secret. EVERYONE in congress has a story when McCain has gone bat-chit crazy. And the electorate knew he was a nut.
Romney has been on both sides of every issue under the sun and he comes across as a guy who stands for nothing but getting elected.
Then factor in the financial collapse which happened on Bush's watch. It doesn't matter if it was or wasn't Bush's fault, the dumb people just saw the economy come unraveled on Bush's watch; so it has to be his fault.
Just like a friend of mine who in 2009 was having hard economic times and blamed it all on Obama. Nevermind that the trouble started a full year before Obama took office, it's just who's in there when it all comes crashing down.
The "middle" did not elect anybody, and only liberals believe they did. The numbers show that approximately 4 million less Republicans have voted in each of the last three Presidential elections. When the choices are a Democrat, or a Republican that acts like a Democrat, lots of conservatives lose faith in the game and don't play. This will continue as long as Wall Street and the Roves make sure a pussified RINO is the candidate.
In the 2008 election, the Left and of course, the Blacks were very enthused about voting for the first Black President. The Right was less than enthused about McCain and the past eight years of Bush. They were enthused enough about Palin to temporarily take the lead in the polls away from Obama. Then came the financial meltdown just before the election and it was all over.
In the 2010 mid-term election, a lot of the Left and a lot of Blacks stayed home. A lot of really pissed off Conservatives showed up and voted in the largest mid-term Conservative Landslide in our lifetime.
The GOPe ignored that lesson in the 2012 election and enough doubly pissed off swing states Conservatives stayed home and put Obama back in the White House.
Now, everybody is pissed off and the 2014 election is in two months.
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
When the choices are a Democrat, or a Republican that acts like a Democrat, lots of conservatives lose faith in the game and don't play. This will continue as long as Wall Street and the Roves make sure a pussified RINO is the candidate.
Yep , even when you win you lose. Pretty effective strategy to "self disenfranchise" the conservative portion of the population.
If the Party of Democratic Light nominates another liberal, neocon, RINO, it won't matter who Democrats nominate. She or he will win. Period.
A word to the wise: last election two very voluminous shills known as Steve_No and RISJR worked diligently to destroy the only authentic conservative running in the election. They used every Saul Alinsky trick in Rules for Radicals to assure that either Romeny or Obama would win, there being not an iota of substantive difference between Romney and Obama. The shills won either way while liberty and America lost. And make no mistake, as a few posters here forewarned: the second the Republicans nominated Romney, Obama had the election wrapped up.
If there is no authentic conservative running in '12, does anyone think it will matter who loses? You can count on my not voting again.
�If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.� ***US President James Madison***
Wouldn't he have to be substantially different than the opposition to crush them?
Seems like an "if ya can't beat em join em strategy" but I know many Republicans care only about winning so I suppose it makes sense. A republican big gov't commie is better than a democratic one?
NO Romney, NO Bush , NO Christie and NOT that whackjob McCain.
+1
The only nearly tolerable candidate to a real conservative voter, who seems a possibility to get the nod, is Rand Paul.
Rand Paul is bragging about being to the LEFT of Hillary Clinton.
That ought to work...
Extra-ordinary claims require proof. There's no one to his right in the US Senate.
Easy look-up on Breitbart TV 24 Aug 2014 Rand Paul: �Dems Scared I Will Run Left of 'Hawk' Hillary� Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said in the 2016 Presidential election he would be able to attract independents and "even some Democrats" voters nervous about entering into a new Middle East war with a "gung-ho" President Hillary Clinton.
Paul said �I think the American public is coming more and more to where I am and that those people, like Hillary Clinton, who�she fought her own war, 'Hillary�s war,' you know?"� "And I think that�s what scares the Democrats the most: Is that in a general election, were I to run, there�s going to be a lot of independents and even some Democrats who say, �You know what? We are tired of war. We�re worried that Hillary Clinton will get us involved in another Middle Eastern war because she�s so gung-ho," he added.
�If you want to see a transformational election in our country, let the Democrats put forward a war hawk like Hillary Clinton, and you�ll see a transformation like you�ve never seen," the Kentucky junior senator concluded.�
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."