24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
link to story
.gov is riddled with these maggots. Behind the scenes folks with huge influence and power, all working night and day to harm us all. Unknown, without publicity, flying under the radar.
Quote
October 25, 2014
Meet Wendy Sherman, architect of appeasement disasters in nuclear negotiations with North Korea and Iran
By Ed Lasky and Thomas Lifson
The Pentagon says that North Korea likely has a nuclear weapon that can be mounted on a missile. Hats off to Wendy Sherman, architect of the 1999 nuclear deal with North Korea that was supposed to prevent this sort of thing. In return for hundreds of millions of dollars of food and oil at a time a million or more people were starving to death under the North Korean regime, the United States received meaningless concessions that did little or nothing to stop North Korea�s nuclear program. That deal was described by former Secretary of State James Baker as �appeasement.�

The only positive thing that could be said about the latest agreement is that it will probably avert a short-term crisis. But at what price? It will make the United States even more reluctant to adopt a more muscular approach toward Korea and thus could actually increase the risk of war on the Korean Peninsula. And the North Koreans may well conclude that their bad behavior will continue to be rewarded.

And so they did and so it was.

For her part, Ms. Sherman displayed a disturbing tendency to gush about Kim Jong-il, the North Korean dictator with whom she negotiated. Apparently flattery of politically powerful people was a career strategy she mastered. Foreign Policy Magazine noted in 2011:

Sherman, who served as State Department counselor and North Korea policy coordinator under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, traveled to Pyongyang with Albright in 2000. Here's how the NPR obit on Kim, who died this past weekend, described her take on Kim:

Wendy Sherman, a special adviser to President Clinton on North Korea, accompanied then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to Pyongyang in 2001, and met Kim along with Swedish Prime Minister Goran Persson.

"We shared similar impressions of meeting him. He was smart and a quick problem-solver," Sherman says. "He is also witty and humorous. Our overall impression was very different from the way he was known to the outside world."

Sherman sat next to Kim at a stadium to watch a huge festival of synchronized dancing. She says she turned to Kim and told him she had the sense that in some other life, he was a "great director."

"He clearly took such delight in putting these performances together," she says. "And he says, yes, that he cared about this a great deal and that he owned every Academy Award movie, he had watched them all, and he also had every film of Michael Jordan's NBA basketball games and had watched them as well."

The New York Times obit has more juicy quotes about Kim from Sherman, comments she made in 2008:

Wendy Sherman, now the No. 3 official in the State Department, who served as counselor to Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright and accompanied her to North Korea, said in 2008: "He was smart, engaged, knowledgeable, self-confident, sort of the master-director of all he surveyed."

Ms. Albright met Mr. Kim in October 2000 in what turned out to be a futile effort to strike a deal with North Korea over limiting its missile program before President Bill Clinton left office.

"There was no denying the dictatorial state that he ruled," Ms. Sherman said. "There was no denying the freedoms that didn't exist. But at the time, there were a lot of questions in the U.S. about whether he was really in control, and we left with no doubt that he was."

When Ms. Albright and Ms. Sherman sat down to talk through a 14-point list of concerns about North Korea's missile program, "he didn't know the answers to every question, but he knew a lot more than most leaders would -- and he was a conceptual thinker," Ms. Sherman added.

That was then, this is now, as the Wall Street Journal reports:

A top U.S. commander said Friday that North Korea likely has the capability to produce a nuclear warhead that could be mounted on a rocket, putting its wherewithal to build a nuclear missile within closer reach.

North Korea has struggled for years in its attempts to develop nuclear warheads and long-range missiles, as well as with the steep technical challenges of combining warhead and missile technology.

But the secretive dictatorship apparently has moved a significant step closer, according to Pentagon officials. Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon on Friday, Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of U.S. forces on the Korean peninsula, said North Korea now is capable of building a miniaturized nuclear warhead, a step needed to complete development of a nuclear-tipped missile.



Undated photo from KCNA official news agency, via Getty and the Wall Street Journal

The brutal and repressive dictatorship may now have the ability to hit the western United States with a nuclear warhead, not to mention the ability of hit Japan. That nation�s response is yet to be seen, but one can expect the Japanese �nuclear allergy� to fade even more in the face of a potential mortal threat.

Even more ominously:

Gen. Scaparrotti said North Korea may have gained know-how on warhead-miniaturization technology through its relationships with Iran and Pakistan.

Iran does not yet possess nuclear weapons. What are the odds that North Korea, hard-pressed for foreign exchange, will sell missiles, warheads, and related technologies to Iran?

And guess who is on the job negotiating with Iran on preventing that country from obtaining nuclear weapons? None other than Wendy Sherman, now head of the US negotiating team, bringing her appeasement approach to the mullahs.

If she is as successful with Iran as she was with North Korea, we can expect the mullahs to obtain the capability of ushering in the Armageddon they see as paving the way for the return of the Twelfth Mahdi, the ultimate goal of the regime, which has taken the trouble to pave a highway leading from the Mahdi�s tomb, so he can travel with ease when he rises from the dead during the nuclear holocaust they seek, wiping out both the Little Satan (Israel) and the Great Satan (America).

What about her qualifications and experience?

Ms. Sherman brings just the sort of credentials you would expect in a Clinton and Obama appointee, currently the fourth-ranking employee in the Department of State:

A degree and work experience in social work;
The former director of EMILY�S list, the abortion-supporting political fundraising organization contributing almost exclusive to Democrats;
Former head of the DC office of the failed Dukakis presidential campaign;
The former director of the office of child welfare of Maryland
Founding president of the Fannie Mae foundation, a money-dispensing offshoot of the quasi-governmental agency that more than anyone else was responsible for the 2008 mortgage crisis.
The last two Democrat presidents found these qualifications so compelling they made her responsible for some of the most complex and highest stakes negotiations of the current era.

Nothing succeeds like failure in certain places in Washington.

The Pentagon says that North Korea likely has a nuclear weapon that can be mounted on a missile. Hats off to Wendy Sherman, architect of the 1999 nuclear deal with North Korea that was supposed to prevent this sort of thing. In return for hundreds of millions of dollars of food and oil at a time a million or more people were starving to death under the North Korean regime, the United States received meaningless concessions that did little or nothing to stop North Korea�s nuclear program. That deal was described by former Secretary of State James Baker as �appeasement.�

The only positive thing that could be said about the latest agreement is that it will probably avert a short-term crisis. But at what price? It will make the United States even more reluctant to adopt a more muscular approach toward Korea and thus could actually increase the risk of war on the Korean Peninsula. And the North Koreans may well conclude that their bad behavior will continue to be rewarded.

And so they did and so it was.

For her part, Ms. Sherman displayed a disturbing tendency to gush about Kim Jong-il, the North Korean dictator with whom she negotiated. Apparently flattery of politically powerful people was a career strategy she mastered. Foreign Policy Magazine noted in 2011:

Sherman, who served as State Department counselor and North Korea policy coordinator under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, traveled to Pyongyang with Albright in 2000. Here's how the NPR obit on Kim, who died this past weekend, described her take on Kim:

Wendy Sherman, a special adviser to President Clinton on North Korea, accompanied then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to Pyongyang in 2001, and met Kim along with Swedish Prime Minister Goran Persson.

"We shared similar impressions of meeting him. He was smart and a quick problem-solver," Sherman says. "He is also witty and humorous. Our overall impression was very different from the way he was known to the outside world."

Sherman sat next to Kim at a stadium to watch a huge festival of synchronized dancing. She says she turned to Kim and told him she had the sense that in some other life, he was a "great director."



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014..._north_korea_and_iran.html#ixzz3H9tb9QCn
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


Sam......


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,108
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,108
Our main problem is that we keep sending people to Washington that has never done anything in real life and therefore have no clue as to the real workings of America. All that they know is politics and how to stay in power. The ones in charge tend to associate with people just like themselves so even the unelected positions get filled with people that do not know how to do anything. As Jerry Clowers put it, so well, "They are educated way above their intelligence". miles


Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by milespatton
Our main problem is that we keep sending people to Washington that has never done anything in real life and therefore have no clue as to the real workings of America. All that they know is politics and how to stay in power. The ones in charge tend to associate with people just like themselves so even the unelected positions get filled with people that do not know how to do anything.

So why keep voting for them...?
If you keep doing what you've always done, then you're gonna continue to get what you've always gotten. Anytime someone mentions voting for someone that they actually support...as opposed to just voting for the candidate 'the team' parades out (even if you don't support him/her)...they are told they are "wasting" their vote on someone who cannot win. And not only that...they are also told that they are actually helping the opposition get elected.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,279
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,279
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by milespatton
Our main problem is that we keep sending people to Washington that has never done anything in real life and therefore have no clue as to the real workings of America. All that they know is politics and how to stay in power. The ones in charge tend to associate with people just like themselves so even the unelected positions get filled with people that do not know how to do anything.

So why keep voting for them...?
If you keep doing what you've always done, then you're gonna continue to get what you've always gotten. Anytime someone mentions voting for someone that they actually support...as opposed to just voting for the candidate 'the team' parades out (even if you don't support him/her)...they are told they are "wasting" their vote on someone who cannot win. And not only that...they are also told that they are actually helping the opposition get elected.

What alternative do you suggest? Let's undertake a campaign to stop everyone from voting. (Forget about "voter suppression" for the moment.) Let's say we're successful enough to get 99.9% of the people stop voting. Now we have 0.1% of the people putting the same people in power. Just wondering -- how does that solve anything?

Steve.


"I was a deerhunter long before I was a man." ~Gene Wensel's Come November (2000)
"A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user." ~Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
How 'bout simply voting for the candidate that you actually do support...?


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
frankly, I am not so sure that the folks I am referring to in the original post are accountable to the voting process. Once in place, they are career civil service, and pretty much untouchable.


Sam......

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
E
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33,856
Originally Posted by antlers
How 'bout simply voting for the candidate that you actually do support...?




So, every Dimocrap supports whatever pos the party runs, conservatives should write in their favorite candidate?

How much are you paid as a Dimocrap strategist?


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.

If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23,561
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23,561
Likes: 2
this is an example of what infuriates me about our foreign policy

We get a towel head goat herder with an AK and a video camera declaring war on the United States and we spare no expense to wipe it out

meanwhile, North Korea is shooting missiles toward Hawaii and selling/buying nuke information with Pakistan, and has the capacity to build a nuke

and every other week they are spouting on about how any provocation against them by us is an act of war.


apparently we'll kick your ass if you just have an AK and some RPG's, but if you have nukes aimed at us we just send you food if you promise to not do it again.

if I'm going to lose sleep over being attacked, I think I'd go with the guy building nuclear missiles aimed at us.

Last edited by KFWA; 10/25/14.

have you paid your dues, can you moan the blues, can you bend them guitar strings
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,240
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,240
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by milespatton
Our main problem is that we keep sending people to Washington that has never done anything in real life and therefore have no clue as to the real workings of America. All that they know is politics and how to stay in power. The ones in charge tend to associate with people just like themselves so even the unelected positions get filled with people that do not know how to do anything. As Jerry Clowers put it, so well, "They are educated way above their intelligence". miles


This. They got their job because they stayed in school and have a big fat diploma and no real experience. Jerry Clower was right. We could sure use Jerry's wit right about now. kwg


For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,499
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by eyeball
Originally Posted by antlers
How 'bout simply voting for the candidate that you actually do support...?

So, every Dimocrap supports whatever pos the party runs, conservatives should write in their favorite candidate?
How much are you paid as a Dimocrap strategist?

With 'genius' thinking like yours, it's no wonder the Republicans get their a$$es handed to em' time after time by the worst possible people to be leading our country. You and those like you do just as much damage, if not more, to the Republicans than the Democrats do.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
IC B3

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,108
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,108
Quote
So why keep voting for them...?


Sadly, I am not the only one that votes or chooses candidates. miles


Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261
Originally Posted by antlers
How 'bout simply voting for the candidate that you actually do support...?


If I did that I would actually have to stop voting.


Don't vote knothead, it only encourages them. Anonymous

"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." Anonymous

"Self-reliance, free thinking, and wealth is anathema to both the power of the State and the Church." Derby Dude


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 99
S
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
S
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 99
yeah, how DARE those soveriegn nations do something that we dont like? I mean, we're the big bully on the block, so why can't we have whatever we want?

Last edited by squesh; 10/25/14.
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,958
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,958
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
frankly, I am not so sure that the folks I am referring to in the original post are accountable to the voting process. Once in place, they are career civil service, and pretty much untouchable.

Not sure on that Sam. Everyone of them is accountable to someone above them . Political appointees and Bureau Admin heads all still have to answer to someone.It is the one thing the Dems outgun Conservatives on every time. When a Clinton or Obama type gets in they fill every position with one of their key players and the Republicans fail miserably at cleaning out these mouse turds. Eliminate their job,reorganize their bureau whatever but they need to clean house of all these people that create policies the libs espouse. Do whatever it takes and when the media and libs start pissing and whining about it just get some sour looking old bat in front of the TV cameras and have her say " Does it matter?" Seems to work for the libs. Magnum Man

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 67,762
Likes: 5
maybe that's so. They have civil service protections though, and it's damn difficult to root them out. They are not elected, and it makes no difference to them when administrations change, or when a different party is in power, than when they got their jobs.


Sam......

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,961
Likes: 1
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 14,961
Likes: 1
Thanks MM. obama put a commie in every position imaginable,
including the military. I think even the janitors have
to be commies. IMO mad


--- CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE --- A Magic Time To Be An Illegal In America---

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

82 members (300_savage, AB2506, AscensionIndustries, 10gaugemag, Akhutr, 10 invisible), 1,230 guests, and 663 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,863
Posts18,497,224
Members73,980
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.146s Queries: 46 (0.018s) Memory: 0.8837 MB (Peak: 0.9848 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-08 07:48:37 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS