Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire REVENGE: French Attack Mosques And Blow Up A Muslim Kebab Shop

That would depend on the threat level, and the number of terrorists.

I don't think that anyone would indiscriminately start shooting Muslims, but if a concerted effort by a large number of them were made to pull off terrorist attacks here, and the source was found to be the Muslims living in our society as "peaceful", there would be hell to pay.

This could be the start of something good. When you pull sheet like this and you comprise 14% or so of the population even if the government won't do a damn thing you'd be smart to duck.

That's not what I asked you.

The momafrickers flew three airliners into two of the most iconic buildings in America, and Americans did nothing.

A Muslim, living among us, killed fifteen soldiers in a mass shooting while proclaiming jihad, and Americans did nothing.

A Muslim proclaiming jihad cut a woman's head off, in Oklahoma no less, and not even a mad family member did anything.

Nope, Americans talk pretty big but we've been pretty much neutered by big government. Eighty or a hundred years ago, the oak trees and telephone poles would be getting a workout but now, no it isn't going to happen.

Did nothing???? Blowing up half of Afghanistan, throwing Al Qaida out and deposing the Taliban for harboring them is nothing??? Going to war is doing something.

The NSA is NOT our friend! They would have their thumb on anyone who took any meaningful action, and the storm troopers would show up.

Welcome to the New World Order.

When you set a bear trap it WILL catch bears. However it will also catch anyone or anything stupid enough to touch the trigger plate.

I agree with you, but consider #1.

Saul Alinsky�s 12 Rules for Radicals

Here is the complete list from Alinsky.

* RULE 1: �Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.� Power is derived from 2 main sources � money and people. �Have-Nots� must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: �Never go outside the expertise of your people.� It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don�t address the �real� issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: �Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.� Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: �Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.� If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity�s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: �Ridicule is man�s most potent weapon.� There is no defense. It�s irrational. It�s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: �A good tactic is one your people enjoy.� They�ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They�re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid �un-fun� activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: �A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.� Don�t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: �Keep the pressure on. Never let up.� Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: �The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.� Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists� minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: �If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.� Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management�s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: �The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.� Never let the enemy score points because you�re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you�re not part of the solution, you�re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.� Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Derby Dude, you are completely unaware of the jihad we Christians have embarked on with regard to pagans.

We have annihilated ALL the relevant ones.

You are safe.

Heh heh.

DD is one hell of a freakshow foil and I like how he can always be depended on to rile up the feeble minded.

But damn, good zing.

That's about it.
Though I do recall some POS idiot in Texas who murdered a Sikh after 9-11.

Maybe since we had a President who kicked butt on two muzzie countries we didn't think we needed to.

Don't so hard on him. His intentions were good.

Murdered an innocent person but his intentions were good! JFHC

God Bless Texas....

here in Oregon, with our Potland liberals.. they would have charged and indicted the hunter for murder...because the perp always has more rights than their victims...according to liberals..

Darn good shootin'.

My answer is still yes no matter who the terrorist is.

That's what I'm talking about.

That was the government strutting like a bantam rooster.

We are no closer to this so-called war being over and Americans especially white Americans being safer. White Americans are so guilt ridden that they are like a deer in the headlights.

Of course, our government is 50% of the problem so what can we expect.