Deep, long-time affection for the 1911 .45 neither over-
shadowed nor surrendered to my love for fine revolvers.
Admiration for the ingenuity of the 1911's design led me to
buy my first one, a civilian Colt, in 1952.
That admiration grew through the decades that followed, as
I acquired and studied many more 1911s and A-1s — Colts,
rattly militaries, clones, and rip-offs — AMT Hardballer, Ballester-
Molina, Star PD, even at one point a .22 Long Rifle conversion kit.
(Wish I still had that last one! It was fun! And ingeniously designed
with the “Carbine Williams” chamber to simulate .45 ACP recoil.
Old “friend” who has it won't let me buy it back.)
Even put some together from unfitted parts that wouldn't go
together without being pounded back and forth with a
rubber mallet until fine grinding compound made 'em slide
back and forth slicker'n new leather soles on dry pine needles,
with no discernible slack. Smooth!
Had a friend put a Smith & Wesson rear sight on a .38 Super
that I then converted to .45 ACP (before I got my own mill).
Accurized some to shoot “bug holes” in 2700 target competition.
Designed and made a few after-market add-on and replacement parts.
Until lately, it seemed to me that the Kimber was the best of the bunch.
(Wish I still had that one, too! It was a beauty! But just as I've done
way too often with way too many fine guns, I let it get away from me.)
Now, it seems that the Ruger SR1911 .45 may be as good as the Kimber
and possibly even a tad better. (It's apparently a clone of Colt's “improved”
Series 70 modification of John Browning's original loosy-goosy design,
with maybe another modernization or two that Ruger has added.)
And for sheer beauty, what man with a drop of testosterone and even a dab
of æsthetic or design appreciation could fail to love this? —
("Borrowed" this image from the Ruger web site. It's now the "wallpaper"
on my Windows 7 start-up screen. Yep — the old infatuation still flares high,
and I'm as jumpy as a flea on a hot rock, eager to feast my eyes
and wrap my fist around the real thing!)
According to the Ruger web site, it comes with
two magazines —
so that one that's carried loaded and locked with a full magazine can be
alternated (empty) every month or so to let its compressed feeder spring
relax before it develops so much spring fatigue that it feeds weakly
(or not at all) at the most inconvenient moment.
And like many other modern handguns, it comes with the three-dot sight
system that my friend "Mick" Gathright originated. That — with other
pleasant memories — will warm my heart on these cold desert nights!
Only prolonged heavy use will eventually show whether the Ruger or
the Kimber is the better 1911. Their metallurgy is the key.
Which has the better steel in terms of hardness, brittleness, wear,
breakage, metal fatigue,
etc? Or is either as good as the other
for consistently standing-up to long, strenuous shooting?
(This level of use — let's hope! — will never be required of self-defense guns!)