|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074 |
Anyone ever chronograph a Ruger 77 compact in 308 Win.?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074 |
I am wondering with the loss of velocity how far this rifle will effectively shoot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
Look at Hodgdon's online handgun data for 308 Winchester. It was shot with a 15" barrel. Several powders provided 2650 to 2675 fps or thereabout with 150 grain bullets. With 165's a number of powders gave mid to upper 2500's. These figures approximate good 300 Savage loads.
Anyway, what precisely do you mean by how far will it effectively shoot?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 983
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 983 |
Fast enough and FAR enough-Muddy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
I took my 17.5" 308 to 1000yd on many occasions...never had an issue getting there with 178 AMAX or 175 BTHP.
I could squeeze 2850 out of 155 Scenars without trying TOO hard.
Last edited by liliysdad; 03/29/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,942 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,942 Likes: 3 |
These guys only lost 32 fps cutting a 26" barrel down to 18". http://www.tacticaloperations.com/SWATbarrel/Based on what I see from others who have cut a barrel around 15-20 fps loss for each inch is typical. The problem with comparing gun "A" with gun "B", is that you can see 100-130 fps difference with barrels of the same length. That would be a bit extreme, but not unheard of. Around 25-50 fps is very common. With that in mind, if you are comparing one gun with a 20" barrel to another with a 22" barrel the 20" barrel might well be 25-50 fps faster. Or the 22" barrel could be 100-150 fps faster. People often see the latter and conclude that a gun loses 50-75 fps for every inch the barrel is shorter. They never consider the primary reason is simply the difference between the individual guns.
Most people don't really want the truth.
They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 255
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 255 |
For hunting a 16" barrel is plenty long enough. The problem is the nasty muzzle blast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,934
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,934 |
I'd like to know what powders people are using to get those speeds. I'm running a 20" Krieger barrel and when loading 44.3 gr of IMR 4064 (which is compressed) with a 178 AMAX at 2.800, I'm only getting 2550 fps. I find that I really have to lean on a charge of [Varget/IMR4064/RL-15] to even get over 2600 fps.
This barrel has a Winchester Sniper chamber:
NECK DIAMETER|THROAT ANGLE|FREEBORE SAAMI|1*30|0.112
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
My 20's get mid 2500 with 42g Imr4895 under 168's.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6 |
For hunting a 16" barrel is plenty long enough. The problem is the nasty muzzle blast.
That, and often miserable balance. A 20 inch is plenty short enough for almost any civilian purpose, looks better, handles better, and won't blow your brains out if you take a shot in the field without ear protection. I hate being anywhere near those short-barreled monstrosities at the range, even the .223s.
Last edited by Pappy348; 03/30/15.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 213
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 213 |
I got an average of 2555 with 165's and a max load of varget with my 77 compact. Maybe not the fastest bullet speed but sure was nice gun to pack.
There is a reason why you never hear of anyone shooting a 308 winchester AI.... It can't be improved upon!! Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 213
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 213 |
I got an average of 2555 with 165's and a max load of varget with my 77 compact. Maybe not the fastest bullet speed but sure was nice gun to pack.
There is a reason why you never hear of anyone shooting a 308 winchester AI.... It can't be improved upon!! Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
That, and often miserable balance. A 20 inch is plenty short enough for almost any civilian purpose, looks better, handles better, and won't blow your brains out if you take a shot in the field without ear protection.
I hate being anywhere near those short-barreled monstrosites at the range, even the .223s.
Good Lord, grandpa. I have been shooting and hunting with short barreled (<18") for years, most of them even have brakes. I have yet to have a concern about "balance," and the critters have yet to comment on how ugly they are. I dont have an issue with the noise, or blast, and could not care less what others shooting next to me think about it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
If that guy is the one who shoots what works for him..then yeah, I am him. Brakes work...so I use them. Short barrels make my life easier...so I use them. I dont shoot to make others happy, I shoot what makes me happy.
Luckily, I rarely shoot with folks who dont share similar tastes, but on occasion I do. On those occasions..tough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,579 |
I get 2700 fps chronoed with my accuracy load in my 16 1/2" Ruger RSI Hawkeye 308 with 150gr Accubonds and Varget. Shoots around an inch at 100 yds with 2.5-8x32 Conquest, about the same at 50 yds with irons.
There is no retreat but in submission and slavery!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
Like I said earlier, I was getting 2850 out of 17.5" 308 and 155s. I did have to lean on it and crunch some Varget...but it shot well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746 |
Yeah, life is too short to have basic respect for others. Gotta love internet tough guys.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
So..I should shoot a rifle that is less than optimum for my needs and wants to ensure the comfort of someone who may or may not be there? Yeah, I am gonna pass, thanks.
I have a suppressor in the wings for this rifle...guess who its not for?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 255
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 255 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6 |
That, and often miserable balance. A 20 inch is plenty short enough for almost any civilian purpose, looks better, handles better, and won't blow your brains out if you take a shot in the field without ear protection.
I hate being anywhere near those short-barreled monstrosites at the range, even the .223s.
Good Lord, grandpa. I have been shooting and hunting with short barreled (<18") for years, most of them even have brakes. I have yet to have a concern about "balance," and the critters have yet to comment on how ugly they are. I dont have an issue with the noise, or blast, and could not care less what others shooting next to me think about it. Well, Sparky, my point wasn't that you should care about what someone else thinks of your noisy rifle, it's that one noisy enough to be offensive to someone down the line wearing earplugs is likely pretty hard on the ears of the one shooting it in the field, as most of us still do, without protection. Balance and looks are subjective, as is the decision to run a brake and trade recoil for more noise. Go for it.
Last edited by Pappy348; 03/30/15.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 549
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 549 |
My 20's get mid 2500 with 42g Imr4895 under 168's. That's close to my 20". I'm getting low 2600s with 165 SGKs.
Ray
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746 |
I was talking about your attitude, not your guns... a distinction that will certainly be lost on you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612 |
I am aware that my response came off a bit short...and for that I apologize. I do grow tired of the "my way, or its stupid" attitude on this site at times. It seems that unless is a walnut stocked, 26" barreled .257 Bob, or some stainless something in a a McMillan, its useless.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
If I remember correctly my former frontier ran 165 so at 2425 with LC brass and 42.0 gr 4895.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746 |
No worries my friend. I don't know why I got all bent out of shape about it. I'm a little thin-skinned today and it wasn't even directed at me lol.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 429
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 429 |
No, they lost 32 fps going from 20" to 18", not 26" to 18".
You can piddle with the puppies, or run with the wolves...
Better living through chemistry!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 6 |
Just for grins:
165 BT @ 2750 falls below 1800 fps @575 yards, zeroed @200 falls -23.08 @400
165 BT @ 2550 falls below 1800 fps @475 yards, zeroed @200 falls -27.38 @400
Even the slow one has over 1100 ft. lbs. at 500 yards.
This according to Nosler's ballistics app. 1800fps is an approximate velocity limit for reliable expansion. In other words, no big deal for most hunting.
Last edited by Pappy348; 03/30/15.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,078
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,078 |
I've cut both my Rem varmint 308s from 26" down to 20.5" and 22". They lost about 15 fps per inch with my warm handloads.
Going down from 20" to 16" I would expect to lose a bit more fps per inch, since barrel pressure is higher.
Losing 32 fps between 20" and 18" sounds about right to me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,128 Likes: 2
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,128 Likes: 2 |
I am wondering with the loss of velocity how far this rifle will effectively shoot. Farther than you can effectively aim. No dis intended... I have a 17 inch bbl '06 that I can and have pushed to better than 350 yards.. Knowing the range, the trajectory of your bullet, and a dead solid rest does the job. I have never chronied the thing- just shot it at range to 300...checked the ballistics, etc. I'll push the 27 inch heavy bbl '06 to 500, if I know the range and trajectory.. I ain't real adventuresome...
The only true cost of having a dog is its death.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,920
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,920 |
Hornady 165 SST/46.0/W-748....2730 20" barrel Remingtom LTR... 2635 18" barrel Ruger GSR
Sierra 168 MKBTHP/46.0/W-748....2715 20" barrel Remington LTR...2625 18" barrel Ruger GSR
I have a 16.5" Frontier but have never chronoed those loads from that rifle...
Bob
If you can not deal with reality, reality will deal with you....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817 |
I am wondering with the loss of velocity how far this rifle will effectively shoot. ......Here is my answer for ya. At any hunting or target shooting distance you care to use the Ruger Frontier for.......Here is a link that will take away any concerns you have. www.shootingtimes.com/long-guns/longgun_reviews_scout_102606/Scroll down to the heading "Short Barrel, Long Reach" and read the rest of the article.
28 Nosler,,,,300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
Much depends on the rifle as well. I only gain 100 Fps from a 26" Remington compared to a 20" Steyr.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,362
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,362 |
Never any negative comments about muzzle blast when I have the Remington 600 at the range, matter of fact, people seem to be drawn to it....
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
Broke 2700 with 46.0 target under 168 zmax hornady in the 20" HBÇ this morning.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
Once fired FC. 2.83" coal No pressure signs.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
That would be a pretty stiff load with the lots of Varget and FC brass I've used.
46 under a 168 is the usual in WW brass weighing about 155 grains, rather than FC which usually comes in close to 180.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
The Steyr's barrel are usually a bit quicker.
GM308M runs mid 2500's from the same rifle.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,170 |
Slight compression at the very end of the seating stroke. Minor. Primers slightly flattened. No cratering, no extractor scuff, easy bolt lift. Haven't mic'd primer pockets. Not my normal load. Loading it a bit long keeps compression down. I wouldn't run it in my M1A NM, but, its fine in the Steyr. I wouldn't use LC brass either.
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
Here are some real world chrono velocities using my Ruger Scout, which has a 16.5" barrel like the Ruger Compact.
2699fps, 150g BT/Varget 2625fps, Remington 150g Core-Lokt PSP (Factory rated @ 2820fps)
2296fps, 208g AMAX/Varget 2252fps, 208g AMAX/BL-(C)2
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591 |
I get a fraction over 2,800 fps from a 20" Sako 85 using 150gr SST's. 45g H4895, Fed 210M, Lapua cases.
Found that the faster H4895 gives better velocity than Varget in shorter .308 barrels for similar accuracy.
"The 257 Roberts, some people like to call it the “.257 Bob.” I think these people should be hung in trees where crows can peck at them." - David Petzal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074 |
In answering my own question I recalled a similar project from 20 Yrs. ago or so. I owned a Magnum Research Lone Eagle in 30.06. This pistol had a 14" barrel. The load I used was a 135 gr. Sierra Pro Hunter ( I believe was developed for the TC contender 30-30). I was using H-4895....which was a a near max load IIRC. I was getting around 2700 FPS.
Guess I answered my own question. Thanx for the responses.
|
|
|
|
594 members (160user, 16penny, 10ring1, 007FJ, 1badf350, 17CalFan, 52 invisible),
2,935
guests, and
1,259
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,491
Posts18,490,373
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|