Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Rand Paul Exposes Neocons

“Why the hell did we ever go into Libya in the first place?”
---Rand Paul---

Liberals & neocons want to democratize the world, willing to accept disastrous consequences, force us closer to bankruptcy, and make enemies.

Conservatives want noninterventionism, not to be confused with isolationism.

The Republican Party will resume its nascent history of foisting neocons upon its constituents. It will repeat its patten of destroying authentic conservative candidates, for the Republican Party has morphed into the party of Democratic Light.

If the Republican Party nominates another neocon, Hillary wins, for conservatives will not support another neocon. Would it matter who wins were the '16 election offer us an option of a neocon or Hillary? They are one-in-the-same.

Speaking of neocons Paul said:

"I got tired of seeing people in my party getting in charge and not doing anything at all," he told activists at the party's “Leadership Summit” in Nashua, New Hampshire.
"They all look alike, the all sound alike, they all dress alike and nothing ever changes."

Worse, neocons militate against Americans' liberties, what we have left of them.

Rand Paul

Rand Paul is a Conservative and Conservatives support foreign wars.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/rand-paul-supports-us-war-middle-east-destroy-isis_804282.html

Libya was contained before we went in, I cannot fathom any benefit to the US or the civilized world for what was done there.

DFTFT

How am I a troll for posting an article on what a candidate said and posting a statement on how we Conservatives view foreign war projects?

The core of neoconservative philosophy is an enemy construct.
Without an enemy to focus on the populace of a democratic and free society will always turn inward and find fault with its own government.
With a valid enemy government is allowed to run rhier tricks and games with a curtain between them and concerned eyes.
Neocon candidatea are constantly touting the absolute need to fight foreign threats.
Its simple diversion.
The sad thing is that the liberals have modified the technique, replacing the forging threat with things like environment, pollution, racism ect.
They both have one single desire...
To remain in control.
Nothing is more important that staying in office, primarily and keeping your sect in power secondarily.
The needs , welfare and safety of the people will always be subservient to the powers that fund campaigns and keep politicians in office.

Reagan wanted us to focus on foreign threats and he was a true Conservative so you need to adjust your criteria some.

Neocons have led us to invade a number of countries but now we have a new international one - radical Islam. ISIS, Al Quaida, now Boko Haram has joined ISIS, we're going to be seeing some or all of these here. We're the declared enemy and they're coming if not stopped there. The obvious problem is that we have an administration that supports those who would kill us.
These groups have declared war on Christianity. Many Americans are not Christians but they see us all as being Christian and ready targets for their hatred.

I thought sans souci died, and the hogs ate him.

Too funny! Almost spit up my coffee on that one!

He also was fascinated with Moonraker.
Not a big fan.

The only neocons are people like Ron Paul who are actually libertarians and fortunately he is out of office now so we don't have to listen to his limited government crap.

“As a descriptive adjective, the term “neoconservative” is perfectly useless unless it is used as an insult.
Therefore, the term has no place in constructive discourse and is better suited for liberal blogs where the sole purpose is to confirm the reader’s biases.”

Conservatives do not support foreign wars.

Conservatives are noninterventionists.

Neocons and liberals LOVE foreign wars.

BOWSINGER,

If you'd don't know what constitutes a neocon, you ought not be voting.

Romney, whom you adored, was a classic neocon.

Google: "Leo Stauss neoconservatism"

Ronald Reagan was a Conservative and was very much an interventionist.

Liberals also have interest in interventionism.

What you are talking about are nutjob isolationist libertarians.

Yep, just like we Republicans calling a Democrat a communist when we all support the planks of communism.



http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

I'm the personification of individual liberty. You're feeding liberty to hogs with great alacrity.