|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 238
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 238 |
What .30 cal bullet do you use in your .300 Win Mag, .308 and 30-06, that does the least amount of meat damage to black bear and deer?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,981
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,981 |
Impact velocity is probably as/or more responsible for meat damage as the bullet construction. Though, I would have to believe that a thin jacketed bullet would do more immediate damage than a controlled expansion round. Bullet placement is also critical, behind the shoulder and thru the lungs is a pretty good place to put the round. Basically, if you want to eat it don't put a bullet there!! memtb
You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel
“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,380
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,380 |
On Deer, A 180 grain bullet, the old Trophy Bonded has done the least meat damage - except when I hit a bone.
They don't usually leave a bunch of bullet fragments in the wound channel. I find a Partition does leave some, otherwise that would be my candidate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735 |
I have shot a fair number of deer with Barnes bullets in a lot a lot of different flavors, and they consistently produce less meat damage. I won't begin to guess why they do such a thorough job at the same time on chest contents though. From 53 grain TTSXs to 250 grain T-EZs the results are pretty uniform. The holes all look more or less the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,442 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,442 Likes: 1 |
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 178 |
Heavy for caliber, moderate velocity is all you need.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,392 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,392 Likes: 1 |
I've had great luck with barnes TTSX's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,174
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,174 |
220 woodliegh
TRUMP- GABBARD 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,849 Likes: 11
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,849 Likes: 11 |
Based on 4 deer taken with Partitions in .243, .257, .277, and .308, my impression was that there was less meat damage than with C&Cs. All were heart shots, or nearly so and all were within 30 yards, so impact velocity was high.
Generally, to avoid meat damage, don't shoot meat.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1 |
After literally hundreds of critters processed, with a large percentage stuff I have shot, the Barnes bullets are so far ahead of everything else there is absolutely no comparison.
The nature of the wounds are different with the Barnes usually producing a wound that bleeds more freely and does less bruising at distances from the hole.
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
After literally hundreds of critters processed, with a large percentage stuff I have shot, the Barnes bullets are so far ahead of everything else there is absolutely no comparison.
The nature of the wounds are different with the Barnes usually producing a wound that bleeds more freely and does less bruising at distances from the hole. This I made a weak (low) shot on a young bull moose one time as he climbed out of a steep pocket-pond in the tundra. It opened him up in the sternum and would have been lethal but I wasn't sure whether I had hit him or not. As he got up on the tundra and trundled away, all I had was a very thin view of his chest and lots of butt. I hoped I'd slip the bullet into the chest and miss the guts. However, as he moved, his butt became the receiving target and the bullet landed squarely in the pelvis. That big bone was chunked into pieces the size of charcoal briquets and might just as well have been smashed after the meat was chilled and hung for a few days. Typically the bone pieces are easy to remove because there's bloody meat around them. These had none of that. Meat loss was insignificant. That was a 225 XFB from a 358 Winchester, but the results have been very similar whether the cartridge was a 7mm-08, 30-06, 340 Weatherby, or other rifle. The worst cases I have seen with monos involved zero/poor expansion and longer bleed times.
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,175
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,175 |
I've had great luck with barnes TTSX's Me too. donsm70
Life Member...Safari Club International Life Member...Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Life Member...Keystone Country Elk Alliance Life Member...National Rifle Association
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,004
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,004 |
I generally load for around 2750 MV in whatever caliber for deer and it gives enough penetration without damaging meat. Haven't used anything but TSX and TTSX for the last 25 years.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,276 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,276 Likes: 1 |
220 Hornady 220 partition
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,036 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,036 Likes: 4 |
220 Hornady 220 partition Yep, Big, slow, heavily constructed bullets if you want to eat right up to the bullet hole.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1 |
After literally hundreds of critters processed, with a large percentage stuff I have shot, the Barnes bullets are so far ahead of everything else there is absolutely no comparison.
The nature of the wounds are different with the Barnes usually producing a wound that bleeds more freely and does less bruising at distances from the hole. This I made a weak (low) shot on a young bull moose one time as he climbed out of a steep pocket-pond in the tundra. It opened him up in the sternum and would have been lethal but I wasn't sure whether I had hit him or not. As he got up on the tundra and trundled away, all I had was a very thin view of his chest and lots of butt. I hoped I'd slip the bullet into the chest and miss the guts. However, as he moved, his butt became the receiving target and the bullet landed squarely in the pelvis. That big bone was chunked into pieces the size of charcoal briquets and might just as well have been smashed after the meat was chilled and hung for a few days. Typically the bone pieces are easy to remove because there's bloody meat around them. These had none of that. Meat loss was insignificant. That was a 225 XFB from a 358 Winchester, but the results have been very similar whether the cartridge was a 7mm-08, 30-06, 340 Weatherby, or other rifle. The worst cases I have seen with monos involved zero/poor expansion and longer bleed times. Yup and the difference is so obvious I have to wonder about the experience level of those not seeing it. I strongly suspect the folks dropping their critters off at the processor are the ones calling for bullets other than monos...
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,082
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,082 |
Partitions. I probably don't have the overall experience of others, but I've used them on deer in 300 Win Mag, 25-06, and 358 Win. Wound channels are consistent and in all but one case, I had a good exit wound as well. In all cases the deer went down in less than 30 yards and never required a second shot.
Start young, hunt hard, and enjoy God's bounty.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 294
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 294 |
165gr Hornady bt and fb have worked good for me in the 30-06 bullet always exits and does not wreck a lot of meat on deer, any 150gr bullet out of A short barrel 308 has killed kindly for me.Never killed A animal with A 300mag, but if I did it would be a 200gr something.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,953
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,953 |
I've shot a few deer with 180 Hornadys for a 308 Carbine. All died with minimum meat loss. As others mention, slow and heavy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,643 Likes: 1 |
Partitions. I probably don't have the overall experience of others, but I've used them on deer in 300 Win Mag, 25-06, and 358 Win. Wound channels are consistent and in all but one case, I had a good exit wound as well. In all cases the deer went down in less than 30 yards and never required a second shot. And that relates to the question of meat damage how?
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
404 members (257 mag, 163bc, 2500HD, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugemag, 37 invisible),
1,629
guests, and
981
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,867
Posts18,497,451
Members73,980
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|