I'm not a big machinegun guy, but my first gunsmithing job ever was working on class 3 weapons, so I gained a few favorites.
I would take a brand new MG3 (current version of the MG-42); they are just so damn cool. Not the greatest LMG in the world, but it sure is the funnest I've ever shot. And that 4 second barrel change, that's just brilliant.
My next stop would be a Sterling Mk V, smoothest, most reliable SMG I ever fired. I have one of the semi-auto's and it's a great gun, but a "happy switch" would be fun.
I'm not a big machinegun guy, but my first gunsmithing job ever was working on class 3 weapons, so I gained a few favorites.
I would take a brand new MG3 (current version of the MG-42); they are just so damn cool. Not the greatest LMG in the world, but it sure is the funnest I've ever shot. And that 4 second barrel change, that's just brilliant.
My next stop would be a Sterling Mk V, smoothest, most reliable SMG I ever fired. I have one of the semi-auto's and it's a great gun, but a "happy switch" would be fun.
Admit it, you chose both of them because of Star Wars.
can anyone imagine a presidential campaign when the demo's and publicans were debating over which machinegun model or type should be brought back first?
If cost were no option and I had a place to shoot her, Ma Deuce!
Though an M-60 would be fun for old times sake, it would give me a chance to practice safety wiring. Besides, i can probably still strip one down and reassemble one blindfolded.
I watched a friend empty a 30 round magazine in his AR15 using a slide fire stock. I think the magazine was empty before the first case hit the dirt. Those things are going to be illegal soon enough. I couldn't afford to shoot one if I had it.
I'm not a big machinegun guy, but my first gunsmithing job ever was working on class 3 weapons, so I gained a few favorites.
I would take a brand new MG3 (current version of the MG-42); they are just so damn cool. Not the greatest LMG in the world, but it sure is the funnest I've ever shot. And that 4 second barrel change, that's just brilliant.
My next stop would be a Sterling Mk V, smoothest, most reliable SMG I ever fired. I have one of the semi-auto's and it's a great gun, but a "happy switch" would be fun.
Admit it, you chose both of them because of Star Wars.
Wow, I didn't make that connection...but yeah, I can admit that. Although it was an MG34 in star wars, not the MG42
My semi-auto Sterling, I actually did buy because of Star Wars. Trying to get my little boy more interested in guns, I knew if I got the Star Wars blaster (he's a HUGE Star Wars fan), that he would go ape-chit...and he did!
One of the best and the simplest ever made was the British Stein Machine Gun, full or semi-auto.
When you look at the BIG picture, it's without a doubt the best SMG of the war. They were VERY reliable, easy to control, and at the height of production they cost the British Government $9.00 per gun to produce. Who needs the "Liberator" just air drop Sten's all over the place...and that's what they did.
I see the new assault rifle from CZ that they're hoping to be adopted for the Czech military is being called the BREN...a bit of marketing genius if you ask me. Also looks to be a hell of a good rifle. Czech small arms have always been very high quality.
They are heavy, unweildy as all get out with one of the worst designed stocks of any gun ever built
That may be true, but the cool factor is off the charts.
Guy had a Thompson at the range one day and let me fire a few rounds. It wasn't hard to manage 3 or 4 shot bursts and stay on a small wooden stump someone had placed at the 50 yard line.
Hearing the thunk-thunk-thunk-thunk of those 230 grain bullets hitting in rapid succession was the aural definition of knock down power.
They are indeed heavy but they are definitely cool guns.
Photo above with Lewis is an aquaintenances grandfather back in the day in Mexico. He was a petroleum or mining engineer. This was the hacienda where they stayed.
Well full auto firearms are legal to own. Need the appropriate license. UZI is the best and most reliable to own. Second choice is the M1919 Browning 30 cal.
Photo above with Lewis is an aquaintenances grandfather back in the day in Mexico. He was a petroleum or mining engineer. This was the hacienda where they stayed.
Just in case Pancho Villa happened to be in the neighborhood?
Photo above with Lewis is an aquaintenances grandfather back in the day in Mexico. He was a petroleum or mining engineer. This was the hacienda where they stayed.
Just in case Pancho Villa happened to be in the neighborhood?
Really? I thought you could still buy them. I realize you can't build them anymore, other than LEO/MIL, but I didn't realize you couldn't buy existing inventory.
most of those guns i have personally shot, and in a free state, they are not illegal to own assuming you got the tax stamps, registered, and all that. They are rather expensive these days. The gun control act of 1934 i think it was required registration and payment of the tax. Prior to that, there was NO issue on any of them. Refering to the 80's the law change did not prohibit or make illegal owning them, just no knew production full auto after that date could be sold to the public. So, those in circulation for the most part were made prior to that date. Having said that one can obtain certain types of federal licenses which gives one acess if you have the money to the new stuff, subject to various restrictions. I have seen most of those shown being used at various shooting events. I don't like an ouzi by the way, but that sten gun is a sweetheart to fire. Very controllable. The thompson is a classic, heavy, obsolete, all of that, but they are great to fire and you can just about watch those pellets going downrange and walk them one at a time into a target. Interesting enought the 1921 version was about 1200rpm and slowed down in the 1928. Also interesting was the original mags were 20 rounds. The WWII versions would not accept the drum mags of the 1921 and 1928, and were much more cheaply made. I don't think i have seen a single person yet firing a thompson that didn't get a woody. One of the difficulties so to speak which makes the mg42 so attractive is the ease of switching out barrels. As opposed to burning out a barrel say on a m16 by too much full auto fire.
Really? I thought you could still buy them. I realize you can't build them anymore, other than LEO/MIL, but I didn't realize you couldn't buy existing inventory.
You honestly didn't understand the context of the question?
He's simply asking what everybody would buy if all the restrictions on MG's and SMG's were lifted tomorrow.
i am afraid kaywoodie, you are always going to have toys i covet. i was looking at a 1873 winchester today in 44.40, you don't want to know the price tag.
i am afraid kaywoodie, you are always going to have toys i covet. i was looking at a 1873 winchester today in 44.40, you don't want to know the price tag.
Ron, that one belongs to a friend! I don't have anything crew served! Or that big and heavy!
Really? I thought you could still buy them. I realize you can't build them anymore, other than LEO/MIL, but I didn't realize you couldn't buy existing inventory.
It's always funny to see you miss sarcasm over and over.
i am afraid kaywoodie, you are always going to have toys i covet. i was looking at a 1873 winchester today in 44.40, you don't want to know the price tag.
Ron, that one belongs to a friend! I don't have anything crew served! Or that big and heavy!
key word, crew served, big and heavy. As apposed to ?????? you need to find me a rear buckhorn sight for a remington 141 by the way.
The WWII versions would not accept the drum mags of the 1921 and 1928, and were much more cheaply made.
The original Thompson/Blish design was WAY more complicated than any SMG needed to be. The M1 & M1A1 were not only significantly cheaper to manufacture, but they were significantly more reliable as well.
i am afraid kaywoodie, you are always going to have toys i covet. i was looking at a 1873 winchester today in 44.40, you don't want to know the price tag.
Ron, that one belongs to a friend! I don't have anything crew served! Or that big and heavy!
key word, crew served, big and heavy. As apposed to ?????? you need to find me a rear buckhorn sight for a remington 141 by the way.
Would if I could, Ron! I had to quit due to the current family situation!!!
American 180 is a super fun SMG to shoot. A friend of mine had 3 of them, even one with the original laser sight that looked like a 2x4 slung under the barrel. The one with the laser sight was from some correctional facility, but I can't recall which.
I got to shoot one, it was way too much fun. He told me that there was something about them that could cause them to fire out of battery (he said that was why the correctional facility stopped using them), and one of his magazines was totaled when he blew a case. All I know is, that was one seriously fun SMG to shoot.
I'm not a big machinegun guy, but my first gunsmithing job ever was working on class 3 weapons, so I gained a few favorites.
I would take a brand new MG3 (current version of the MG-42); they are just so damn cool. Not the greatest LMG in the world, but it sure is the funnest I've ever shot. And that 4 second barrel change, that's just brilliant.
This....^^^
Or maybe a Mark 48....
Or even one of these. Though the whole electricty thing could be a problem....
I just can't garner much love for the MP5. For a year I did LE sales and sold MP5's. They are a finicky be-otch of a sub gun, but they're easy and fun to shoot when they're running.
Doing a roller locking mechanism on a SMG is just a dip-chit idea...notice NO ONE copied that for a SMG.
But a closed bolt was rather forward thinking of H&K, since it's much easier to to learn to shoot a closed bolt SMG than an open bolt. And since they were really the fist to heavily market a closed bolt SMG, they grabbed up all the special ops teams and sewed up the market before anyone else had anything to offer.
The best of the closed bolt SMG's was the Colt 9mm M16. It had better ergonomics, better sights, better magazines, was easier to maintain, more reliable, just as accurate; pretty much better in every way.
But I never sold a Colt, because all the LE departments wanted the H&K before they even looked at them. Because that's what the SAS and FBI HRT used.
The M16 isn't an SMG, by definition. It wasn't designed around and to shoot a pistol cartridge. Was it modified from the original design to shoot a pistol cartridge? Yes. But it wasn't designed around that cartridge or any other pistol cartridge.
To own and utilize? An HK MP-5, preferably suppressed.
While on active duty [USMC 1966-70 FWIW) I fired M-60's and BAR's. Of those, I liked the BAR by far the best, pretty easy to hit with.
We had M-14's in boot camp and at my first duty station but I never used one on auto. We had early AR's in Vietnam and still had M-3A1's in the armory and M-2's on vehicles but I never got to fire either.
The M16 isn't an SMG, by definition. It wasn't designed around and to shoot a pistol cartridge. Was it modified from the original design to shoot a pistol cartridge? Yes. But it wasn't designed around that cartridge or any other pistol cartridge.
How it was "designed" has nothing to do with it. The Colt is full auto, pistol cartridge, blowback design. If design were a part of it, then the MP5 wouldn't be a SMG. It's just a partially shrunken down G-33, even uses the same operating system, whereas the Colt goes from gas operated to blow back.
Maybe it's a carbine to you, but the rest of the world sees the Colt 9mm SMG as a true SMG, even if its adopted from a rifle.
Swedish K was a huge favorite of MACV-SOG in Vietnam. They had to be deniable, so had to carry foreign weapons, and the Swedish K quickly became a big favorite. And the Hi Power became their pistol of choice.
An American 180 , the chainsaw on a budget. But a muffler MP5 would be my 1st choice, and I do get to play with them on a regular basis. Would be nice to have one on the truck seat all of the time
Yeah, one of the best parts of being in the Army. Got to shoot enough to work out the allure of the things. Had an uncle that was the director of one of those federally funded LEO supporting institutions. With the demonstrations and training he got to appreciate the MP5 that way.
Market isn't phugged if someone saw what was coming in 1986 and was smart.
Yes,we can thank Ronnie Regean for this.
Yes! Not enough thanks is given to Reagan for his lifelong support for firearms safety laws. So many Republicans get treated the same way. They are instrumental in getting firearms safety laws on the books, but the media, and even the NRA, do not give them the credit they so richly deserve.
I shot an MP 5 once years ago and while it was fun, I don't have any desire to own one or any other fully auto firearm. I just don't get into situations where I need to put that many holes in something that fast.
In honor of my father it would a Thompson. Dad marched across Africa and Europe carrying a Thompson. He did a lot of inner city street combat and the Thompson was his go-to gun. He also had massive respect for the BAR and the guys who humped them. Dad liked the Thompson because he said as long as he had a Thompson, he didn't have to try to hit anyone with "that damned 1911."
I don't really have much interest in full-auto as it's a bit spendy to keep them fed, but if I were to go through the headache of obtaining one I think I would like an MG-3, the modern version of the MG-42.
Otherwise, when the time comes that I need a FA, I'll pluck it from a lifeless enemy.