24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,736
B
BMT Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,736
I sent an email to S&W requesting the folding carbine in .45 to go with my M&P .45

The Ruger looks like fun though

Last edited by BMT; 03/25/24.

"The Church can and should help modern society by tirelessly insisting that the work of women in the home be recognized and respected by all in its irreplaceable value." Apostolic Exhortation On The Family, Pope John Paul II
GB1

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,660
N
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
N
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,660
My PC-9 has been really great in functionality and accuracy. I would prefer one without the super tactical forearm and just give it a more traditional stock and forearm like mine. I didn’t watch the whole thing but maybe they already have that configuration.


NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,097
Originally Posted by Garandimal
Originally Posted by K1500
I’ve been tempted by some of these but don’t see what they do that a 5.56 doesn’t do better, except save on ammo costs. Maybe that’s enough.

Startin' w/ a low pressure, large caliber subsonic pistol cartridge, and then runnin' it down a 16" Bbl?

Got to be a lot friendlier to shoot w/o earpro, especially in enclosed spaces, than a 5.56 NATO carbine.

My thought.

GR

There is a way to quiet down a 5.56mm AR carbine.

But that does add expense.


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 37,889
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 37,889
Originally Posted by Garandimal
Originally Posted by K1500
I’ve been tempted by some of these but don’t see what they do that a 5.56 doesn’t do better, except save on ammo costs. Maybe that’s enough.

Startin' w/ a low pressure, large caliber subsonic pistol cartridge, and then runnin' it down a 16" Bbl?

Got to be a lot friendlier to shoot w/o earpro, especially in enclosed spaces, than a 5.56 NATO carbine.

My thought.




GR

Yep, a primary consideration for me, most bird watching is done with your ears. At the ranges I’m likely to need for home defense, pistol cartridges would likely suffice.


"...if the gentlemen of Virginia shall send us a dozen of their sons, we would take great care in their education, instruct them in all we know, and make men of them." Canasatego 1744
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,927
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,927
The Ruger in 45 is on my radar. I may well end up with one soon.

If interested in something in 9mm I will highly recommend this Smith & Wesson.

https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/fpc

Weight is just over 5 lbs unloaded/unscoped. It folds in half to just over 16" and will fit in a small pack.

I put a Holosun dot sight on mine and it puts 5 rounds right at 2" at 100 yards. It takes M&P magazines and comes with two 23 round and one 17 round mags. There are storage compartments for 2 spare mags in the stock. With 63 rounds of ammo onboard and the dot sight it's a bit over 8 lbs.

I paid exactly $700 OTD.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,210
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,210
Originally Posted by JMR40
The Ruger in 45 is on my radar. I may well end up with one soon.

If interested in something in 9mm I will highly recommend this Smith & Wesson.

https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/fpc

Weight is just over 5 lbs unloaded/unscoped. It folds in half to just over 16" and will fit in a small pack.

I put a Holosun dot sight on mine and it puts 5 rounds right at 2" at 100 yards. It takes M&P magazines and comes with two 23 round and one 17 round mags. There are storage compartments for 2 spare mags in the stock. With 63 rounds of ammo onboard and the dot sight it's a bit over 8 lbs.

I paid exactly $700 OTD.

That’s interesting

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,999
B
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,999
Originally Posted by Jeffrey
Originally Posted by Garandimal
Originally Posted by K1500
I’ve been tempted by some of these but don’t see what they do that a 5.56 doesn’t do better, except save on ammo costs. Maybe that’s enough.

Startin' w/ a low pressure, large caliber subsonic pistol cartridge, and then runnin' it down a 16" Bbl?

Got to be a lot friendlier to shoot w/o earpro, especially in enclosed spaces, than a 5.56 NATO carbine.

My thought.




GR

From a reloading standpoint, the 45 will sip powder and if you shoot cast in it, be very economical to shoot.

That's what I'm thinking. Cast powder coated 230s or so flat round noses at about 1050 fps. I want one. I wish it were just a bit lighter for my kids to use too. Big enough bullet I don't have to worry about expansion and enough power to carry in a bear area.

Bb

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 27,972
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 27,972
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Garandimal
Originally Posted by K1500
I’ve been tempted by some of these but don’t see what they do that a 5.56 doesn’t do better, except save on ammo costs. Maybe that’s enough.

Startin' w/ a low pressure, large caliber subsonic pistol cartridge, and then runnin' it down a 16" Bbl?

Got to be a lot friendlier to shoot w/o earpro, especially in enclosed spaces, than a 5.56 NATO carbine.

My thought.

GR

There is a way to quiet down a 5.56mm AR carbine.

But that does add expense.

Who makes the quietest can, John?


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,042
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,042
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Originally Posted by Garandimal
Originally Posted by K1500
I’ve been tempted by some of these but don’t see what they do that a 5.56 doesn’t do better, except save on ammo costs. Maybe that’s enough.

Startin' w/ a low pressure, large caliber subsonic pistol cartridge, and then runnin' it down a 16" Bbl?

Got to be a lot friendlier to shoot w/o earpro, especially in enclosed spaces, than a 5.56 NATO carbine.

My thought.




GR

Yep, a primary consideration for me, most bird watching is done with your ears. At the ranges I’m likely to need for home defense, pistol cartridges would likely suffice.

Funny.

My dad and his buddies, after a lifetime of shooting/chainsaws/dirt bikes/jet engines - use to sit out in the yard and laugh at the stupid birds, movin' their beaks and makin' a fuss, without sayin' anything.




GR

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

554 members (1lessdog, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 007FJ, 10gaugeman, 1936M71, 50 invisible), 2,423 guests, and 1,320 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,664
Posts18,474,697
Members73,941
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.129s Queries: 16 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8417 MB (Peak: 0.9427 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 16:37:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS