|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,034
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,034 |
"Economists Trust Gary Johnson More Than Donald Trump"
So what? He'll never be president.
"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon
"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,471
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,471 |
Not having to be certified explains how there's so many economists posting on this thread.
Please understand I do not post these for Trumpkins. Trump could order a death raid on their cousin and they'd figure out a way that said cousin probably deserved it, and after all it was necessary to defeat Hillary. Wasn't it?
Democrats are well documented to have been good for the economy in the near term. They can be disastrous in the long term (see the Great Recession as caused by government mandated sub-prime mortgages), but presidencies don't last that long. So, Clinton is easily identifiable as likely good for the economy.
Fiscal conservatives tend to be good at stabilizing the economy after liberals wreck it. Enter Gary Johnson.
How about Trump? If you want to know about how he is bad for an economy, ask all those people he gave the shaft in Atlantic City. So your economic model is elect a democrat to destroy the economy followed by a conservative to stabilize it? So since 'Bummer and Hildebitch have had the last 8 years are you saying its now time to vote against them? Cool, but I'm voting for an actual candidate in this election..so, Exit Gary Johnson.
Last edited by westside_benny; 08/24/16.
Liberalism; The impossible yet accepted notion that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23
New Member
|
|
New Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 23 |
Gary Johnson favors instituting a "carbon fee" which would affect everyone and everything that relies on conventional inexpensive, efficient fossil-derived energy. That may not affect some of you reading this, but then how do you manage to read at all when you are 6 feet underground? https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/08/22/us-libertarian-presidential-candidate-backs-a-carbon-fee/Johnson is a Libertarian In name Only (LINO) if he thinks it is government's role to tax every citizen and business in order to somehow alter or affect Earth's ever-changing and poorly-understood climate system.
Last edited by brians356; 08/24/16.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,612
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,612 |
Not having to be certified explains how there's so many economists posting on this thread.
Please understand I do not post these for Trumpkins. Trump could order a death raid on their cousin and they'd figure out a way that said cousin probably deserved it, and after all it was necessary to defeat Hillary. Wasn't it?
Democrats are well documented to have been good for the economy in the near term. They can be disastrous in the long term (see the Great Recession as caused by government mandated sub-prime mortgages), but presidencies don't last that long. So, Clinton is easily identifiable as likely good for the economy.
Fiscal conservatives tend to be good at stabilizing the economy after liberals wreck it. Enter Gary Johnson.
How about Trump? If you want to know about how he is bad for an economy, ask all those people he gave the shaft in Atlantic City. Another interesting factoid: The United States' Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned lead paint in 1977 in residential properties and public buildings. The window sill next to your crib must have had a fair amount of residual.
Last edited by rlott; 08/24/16.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,471
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,471 |
Not having to be certified explains how there's so many economists posting on this thread.
Please understand I do not post these for Trumpkins. Trump could order a death raid on their cousin and they'd figure out a way that said cousin probably deserved it, and after all it was necessary to defeat Hillary. Wasn't it?
Democrats are well documented to have been good for the economy in the near term. They can be disastrous in the long term (see the Great Recession as caused by government mandated sub-prime mortgages), but presidencies don't last that long. So, Clinton is easily identifiable as likely good for the economy.
Fiscal conservatives tend to be good at stabilizing the economy after liberals wreck it. Enter Gary Johnson.
How about Trump? If you want to know about how he is bad for an economy, ask all those people he gave the shaft in Atlantic City. Another interesting factoid: The United States' Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned lead paint in 1977 in residential properties and public buildings. The window sill next to your crib must have had a fair amount of residual. You DO NOT want to get me started on liberals and LBP...but then I am an evil slumlord.
Liberalism; The impossible yet accepted notion that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
|
|
|
|
|
448 members (1eyedmule, 10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 160user, 54 invisible),
2,668
guests, and
1,336
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,491
Posts18,472,005
Members73,936
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
