Perhaps I can appreciate the subject perhaps more than the topic chosen since it is a beaten one. The article seemed so much of an intellectual celebration to state the obvious- Science now follows money- and that's wrong. Science should champion truth, not platforms.
I will thank you for posting a depth of thought to consider.
I can admit to relating a small bit of reaffirming of his same goal, by others I have read, of those who evolved their stance after objective review. Truth being the goal. For myself I am still open to the possibility that man is affecting this planet- but for now remain unconvinced. Of course I risk nothing if I am wrong or am converted.
