The one I really like is "proving" RL-26 was really temp-sensitive, first by simulating results indoors with a really light bullet in the .264--when a bunch of shooters have found 26 very stable when chronographed in ACTUAL field conditions with heavy-for-caliber bullets in cartridges from the .243 on up.
Then he "backed up" his claim by citing QuickLoad. Now, I have nothing against QL, having used it since it appeared. But even the directions for QL state that actually tested data is preferable.
Damn John, thought you were above petty sh*t like this. Sad
