Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by Filaman
A lot of how we have counted species in the past has been out and out guess work and occassionally been found grossly inaccurate. But even this artificial intelligence is sort of a guess. It still relies on estimation and sometimes that's just off course. There's always a big discrepancy of what the Texas Parks and Wildlife says and what fisherman have seen in person. Who's right? I have a sneaky suspicion it varies. Therefore, I believe the Parks and Wildlife survives by being conservative on its estimation.

And that is again, the point... a managed resource was responding a certain way to the previous methods. Dropping those methods and essentially starting all over brings guessing back to the very beginning.


Exactly, So nothings much different. Same game-different name. But some computer geek or team of geeks now get to claim they came up with something new and innovative. It never ends. A lot of change is needless and just a waste of energy. There's a lot to be said of consistancy, but with some things the only thing consistent is needless change.

Last edited by Filaman; 11/08/19.

What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!